Monitoring endoscopic postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease after an ileocecal resection. Does capsule endoscopy have a role in the short and long term?

Background: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a noninvasive method to detect endoscopic postoperative recurrence (POR) after an ileocolonic resection in Crohn's Disease (CD). Few studies have evaluated the role of SBCE in the early POR (= 12 months). Data for detection of late POR (>12 months) and evaluation of treatment response in previous POR is scarce. We aimed to assess the SBCE performance in the three scenarios (early-POR, late-POR, and previous-POR). Methods: Retrospective 11-year cohort study of SBCE procedures performed on CD patients with ileocolonic resection. Disease activity by Rutgeerts score (RS), correlation with biomarkers, and therapeutic changes were recorded. Results: We included 113 SBCE procedures (34 early-POR, 44 late-POR, and 35 previous-POR). 105 procedures (92.9%) were complete and 97 SBCE (85.5%) were conclusive with no differences between groups. Relevant POR (RS ≥i2) was more frequent in the early-POR group compared to late-POR (58.8% vs 27.3%, p=0.02). In the previous-POR, RS improved in 43.5% of procedures, worsened in 26%, and remained unchanged in 30.5%. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) value of 100µg/g displayed the best accuracy: sensitivity 53.8%, specificity 78.8%, positive predictive value 66.7% and negative predictive value 68.4%. SBCE guided therapeutic changes in 43 patients (38%). No adverse events occurred in our cohort. Conclusion: SBCE is a safe and effective method to assess POR in the early and late setting in clinical practice, and for the evaluation of treatment response to previous POR. FCP is an accurate surrogate marker of POR and 100µg/g value had the best overall accuracy.

[Utility of bolus somatostatin administration in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a controlled, non-randomized study]. / Utilidad de la somatostatina administrada en bolo para prevenir la pancreatitis tras CPRE: estudio controlado no aleatorizado.

INTRODUCTION: Somatostatin is one of the most extensively evaluated drugs in the prophylaxis of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but its utility remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of somatostatin as prophylaxis of ERCP-induced acute pancreatitis. A group of consecutive patients that underwent ERCP in our endoscopy unit was prospectively studied for 8 months. Patients in this group were administered an endovenous bolus of 250 micrograms of somatostatin immediately before introducing the catheter in the papilla of Vater (somatostatin group). This group was compared with another group composed of consecutive patients who had undergone ERCP in the 8 previous months, without somatostatin administration (placebo group). Both groups contained the same number of patients. The following variables were recorded; sex, age, contrast injection in the duct of Wirsung, endoscopist, therapeutic maneuvers, and the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS: During the 16 months of patient inclusion, we performed 320 ERCP in our unit, of which 248 were included in the study: 142 in the somatostatin group and 142 in the placebo group. Of these patients, 152 (53.5%) were men and 132 (46.5%) were women. The mean age was 70.05 +/- 13.83 years (range: 27-93 years). Acute pancreatitis occurred in 10 patients in the somatostatin group and in 5 in the placebo group; this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the remaining variables studied. CONCLUSION: Somatostatin does not seem to be useful in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis.