Observational cohort study of highly functioning community-dwelling older adults to assess their sarcopenic status, leisure physical activity, and quality of life over 12-months.

Background: The prevalence of sarcopenia varies depending on the cohort evaluated, and the diagnostic criteria used. Older adults with sarcopenia report lower quality of life than their non-sarcopenic peers. Leisure physical activity is reported to have a variable effect on sarcopenic status. Most studies to date, have been done in "vulnerable" populations, with fewer done on independent community-dwelling older adults. None have been done in an Alberta, Canada population. Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the sarcopenic status of independent community-dwelling older Albertan adults; whether this changed over 12-months; and any association with self-reported leisure activity or quality of life. Methods: Independent community-dwelling older adults were invited to participate in a 12-month observational study. Assessments were done at baseline, 6 and 12-months for physical function (TUG, SPPB, gait speed, Tinetti, grip strength), muscle mass (DXA, arm and calf circumference), body fat (skinfold, DXA), reported daily exercise (aerobic, resistance), quality of life (EQ5D), and laboratory parameters. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definitions of sarcopenic status were used. Results: All 50 participants (11 male), were independent of all basic activities of daily living at baseline, and most instrumental activities (some needed assistance with driving or finances). They had an average age of 75.8 (67-90) years, with average MMSE and MoCA cognitive scores of 28.1/30 (20-30) and 24.8/30 (14-30) respectively. Eight participants dropped out prior to their first DXA test. Of the remaining 42, 17 participants (5 male) fulfilled the EWGSOP revised criteria for probable, pre-sarcopenia, or sarcopenia, giving a rate of baseline total sarcopenia of 40.5% in this community-dwelling sample. The majority were pre-sarcopenic (28.6%), and sarcopenia was present only in 7.1%. The total sarcopenia group had a lower BMI (25.6 ± 5.1 versus 29 ± 5, p = 0.01), less body fat by skinfold measurement (36.4 ± 6.5 versus 39.3 ± 8.1, p = 0.01) and lower mid-calf (35.6 ± 3.2 versus 37.6 ± 3.4, p = 0.04) and mid-arm (29.1 ± 2.5 versus 31.9 ± 3.5, p = 0.02) circumferences when compared to their non-sarcopenic peers. After 12-months, 39 participants remained in the study. Of these, the sarcopenic status of 7 improved, 10 declined, with the remaining 56% not changing. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline laboratory parameters between the groups, including 25(OH)D status. But, of the status decliners, 40% had suboptimal 25(OH)D at baseline. Self-reported leisure activity (both total time and frequency) was not associated with sarcopenic status at 12-months. EuroQol -5D was not associated with sarcopenic status. Conclusions: The rate of sarcopenia was 7.1%, but the total rate of pre, probable and sarcopenia in this highly functioning, community-dwelling older adult cohort was 40.5%. In the majority (75%), there was either no change, or an improvement, in their sarcopenic status over 12-months. There was no association identified with self-reported leisure activity or quality of life in this cohort.

Trends in osteoporotic fracture and related in-hospital complications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada.

Fragility fractures (i.e., low-energy fractures) account for most fractures among older Canadians and are associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality. Study results suggest that low-energy fracture rates (associated with surgical intervention and outcomes) declined slightly, but largely remained stable in the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic. PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: This study describes rates of low-energy fractures, time-to-surgery, complications, and deaths post-surgery in patients with fractures during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Alberta, Canada, compared to the three years prior. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using provincial-level administrative health data. Outcomes were assessed in 3-month periods in the 3 years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic and in the first two 3-month periods after restrictions were implemented. Patterns of fracture- and hospital-related outcomes over the control years (2017-2019) and COVID-19 restrictions periods (2020) were calculated. RESULTS: Relative to the average from the control periods, there was a slight decrease in the absolute number of low-energy fractures (n = 4733 versus n = 4308) during the first COVID-19 period, followed by a slight rise in the second COVID-19 period (n = 4520 versus n = 4831). While the absolute number of patients with low-energy fractures receiving surgery within the same episode of care decreased slightly during the COVID-19 periods, the proportion receiving surgery and the proportion receiving surgery within 24 h of admission remained stable. Across all periods, hip fractures accounted for the majority of patients with low-energy fractures receiving surgery (range: 58.9-64.2%). Patients with complications following surgery and in-hospital deaths following fracture repair decreased slightly during the COVID-19 periods. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that low-energy fracture rates, associated surgeries, and surgical outcomes declined slightly, but largely remained stable in the first few months of the pandemic. Further investigation is warranted to explore patterns during subsequent COVID-19 waves when the healthcare system experienced severe strain.

Trends in osteoporosis care patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alberta, Canada.

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe osteoporosis-related care patterns during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Alberta, Canada, relative to the 3-year preceding. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study design encompassing 3-month periods of continuous administrative health data between March 15, 2017, and September 14, 2020, described osteoporosis-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment patterns. Outcomes included patients with osteoporosis-related healthcare encounters, physician visits, diagnostic and laboratory test volumes, and treatment initiations and disruptions. The percent change between outcomes was calculated, averaged across the control periods (2017-2019), relative to the COVID-19 periods (2020). RESULTS: Relative to the average control March to June period, all HCRU declined during the corresponding COVID-19 period. There was a reduction of 14% in patients with osteoporosis healthcare encounters, 13% in general practitioner visits, 9% in specialist practitioner visits, 47% in bone mineral density tests, and 13% in vitamin D tests. Treatment initiations declined 43%, 26%, and 35% for oral bisphosphonates, intravenous bisphosphonates, and denosumab, respectively. Slight increases were observed in the proportion of patients with treatment disruptions. In the subsequent June to September period, HCRU either returned to or surpassed pre-pandemic levels, when including telehealth visits accounting for 33-45% of healthcare encounters during the COVID periods. Oral bisphosphonate treatment initiations remained lower than pre-pandemic levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding public health lockdowns further heightened the "crisis" around the known gap in osteoporosis care and altered the provision of care (e.g., use of telehealth and initiation of treatment). Osteoporosis has a known substantial care and management disparity, which has been classified as a crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic created additional burden on osteoporosis patient care with healthcare encounters, physician visits, diagnostic and laboratory tests, and treatment initiations all declining during the initial pandemic period, relative to previous years.

Assessing the Impact of Factors that Influence the Ketogenic Response to Varying Doses of Medium Chain Triglyceride (MCT) Oil.

Objectives, Design, Setting: The ketogenic effect of medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil offers potential for Alzheimer's disease prevention and treatment. Limited literature suggests a linear B-hyroxybutyrate (BHB) response to increasing MCT doses. This pharmacokinetic study evaluates factors affecting BHB response in three subject groups. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy subjects without cognitive deficits <65years, similarly healthy subjects >=65years, and those with Alzheimer's Disease were assessed. INTERVENTION: Different doses (0g,14g, 28g, 42g) of MCT oil (99.3% C8:0) were administered, followed by fasting during the study period. MEASUREMENTS: BHB measured by finger prick sampling hourly for 5 hours after ingestion. Each subject attended four different days for each ascending dose. Data was also collected on body composition, BMI, waist/hip ratio, grip strength, gait speed, nutrient content of pre-study breakfast and side effects. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants: eight healthy; average age of 44yr (25-61), nine healthy; 79yr (65-90) and eight with AD; 78.6yr (57-86) respectively. Compiled data showed the expected linear dose response relationship. No group differences, with baseline corrected area under the blood vs. time curve (r2=0.98) and maximum concentrations (r2=0.97). However, there was notable individual variability in maximum BHB response (42g dose: 0.4 -2.1mM), and time to reach maximum BHB response both, within and between individuals. Variability was unrelated to age, sex, sarcopenic or AD status. Visceral fat, BMI, waist/hip ratio and pretest meal CHO and protein content all affected the BHB response (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a large inter-individual variability, with phenotype effects identified. This highlights challenges in interpreting clinical responses to MCT intake.

A scorecard for osteoporosis in Canada and seven Canadian provinces.

The scorecard evaluates the burden and management of osteoporosis in Canada and how care pathways differ across Canadian provinces. The results showed there are inequities in patients' access to diagnosis, treatment, and post-fracture care programs in Canada. Interventions are needed to close the osteoporosis treatment gap and minimize these inequities. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to develop a visual scorecard that assesses the burden of osteoporosis and its management within Canada and seven Canadian provinces. METHODS: We adapted the Scorecard for Osteoporosis in Europe (SCOPE) to score osteoporosis indicators for Canada and seven provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland). We obtained data from a comprehensive literature review and interviews with osteoporosis experts. We scored 20 elements across four domains: burden of disease, policy framework, service provision, and service uptake. Each element was scored as red, yellow, or green, indicating high, intermediate, or low risk, respectively. Elements with insufficient data were scored black. RESULTS: Canada performed well on several elements of osteoporosis care, including high uptake of risk assessment algorithms and minimal wait times for hip fracture surgery. However, there were no established fracture registries, and reporting on individuals with high fracture risk who remain untreated was limited. Furthermore, osteoporosis was not an official health priority in most provinces. Government-backed action plans and other osteoporosis initiatives were primarily confined to Ontario and Alberta. Several provinces (Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Newfoundland) did not have any registered fracture liaison service (FLS) programs. Access to diagnosis and treatment was also inconsistent and reimbursement policies did not align with clinical guidelines. CONCLUSION: Government-backed action plans are needed to address provincial inequities in patients' access to diagnosis, treatment, and FLS programs in Canada. Further characterization of the treatment gap and the establishment of fracture registries are critical next steps in providing high-quality osteoporosis care.

Correction to: A 3i hip fracture liaison service with nurse and physician co-management is cost-effective when implemented as a standard clinical program.

The original version of this article, published on 22 July 2020, unfortunately contained a mistake.

A 3i hip fracture liaison service with nurse and physician co-management is cost-effective when implemented as a standard clinical program.

A hip fracture liaison service that was implemented in 2 hospitals in Alberta, Canada, co-managed by a nurse and physician, was cost-effective and improved initiation of osteoporosis medication following hip fracture. PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: To determine cost-effectiveness of a 3i hip fracture liaison service (H-FLS) with 12-month follow-up, co-managed by a nurse and physician, when implemented into standard practice. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis compared those receiving the H-FLS to a simulated usual care group using a decision analytic model that incorporated Markov processes. We estimated incremental costs and effectiveness (based on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained) using a lifetime horizon and a healthcare payer perspective. The H-FLS program provided data regarding population at risk, treatment rates, persistence, and intervention costs. We also performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fifty-two patients were included in the H-FLS between June 2015 and March 2018; 69% were female; the average age was 80 ± 11 years. Anti-absorptive treatment following fracture was initiated in 59.6% (95% CI: 55.7-63.5) H-FLS patients relative to 20.9% (95% CI: 13.3-28.5%) receiving usual care (from our published work). Based on modeled cohort simulation cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), every 1000 H-FLS patients would experience 12 fewer hip fractures and 37 fewer total fragility fractures than patients receiving usual care. Over the study horizon, the H-FLS led to only a $54 incremental cost/patient with a modest gain of 8 QALYs/1000 patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6750/QALY gained was less than the $27,000 cost-effectiveness threshold. Eliminating the 9-month follow-up resulted in incremental savings of $218/patient while also reducing 6-month follow-ups increased cost-savings to $378/patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested that the H-FLS would either be cost-saving (60%) or cost-effective (40%). CONCLUSION: A H-FLS implemented into standard practice significantly improved anti-absorptive medication use; a cohort simulation cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) suggested that the H-FLS was cost-effective with potential to become cost-savings.

Implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison services to improve initiation of osteoporosis medication use within 1-year of hip fracture: a population-based time series analysis using the RE-AIM framework.

A hip fracture liaison service that was implemented in 2 hospitals in Alberta, Canada, co-managed by a nurse and physician, was effective for improving initiation of osteoporosis medication following hip fracture. PURPOSE: To examine implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison service (H-FLS) to improve osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance). METHODS: Using population-based administrative data from 7 quarters before and up to 7 quarters after H-FLS implementation, we examined new starts, continued use, and overall use (new starts + continued use) of osteoporosis medication after hip fracture. A total of 1427 patients 50 years and older that underwent hip fracture surgery at 1 of 2 tertiary hospitals in a Canadian province and survived to 12 months post-fracture were included. We also compared treatment initiation rates by sex and hospital. RESULTS: Of the 1427 patients, 1002 (70.2%) were female (mean age = 79.3 ± 11.9 years) and 425 (29.8%) were male (mean age = 73.8 ± 13.8 years). Based on pre-fracture residence within the health zone, 1101 (69%) were considered eligible (Reach). New starts of osteoporosis medication increased from 24.7% pre- to 43.9% post-implementation of the H-FLS (p < 0.001) (effectiveness). The proportion of patients prescribed osteoporosis medication prior to a hip fracture remained consistent (15.1% pre-; 14.7% post-implementation; p = 0.88) with a resultant improvement in overall medication use from 39.8% pre- to 58.6% post-implementation (p < 0.001). Both sites significantly improved medication initiation (site 1: 27.9% pre- to 40.3% post-implementation; site 2: 19.6% pre- to 50.0% post-implementation; p < 0.001 for both) (adoption). Medication initiation in females improved from 26.0% pre- to 43.4% post-implementation while initiation in males improved from 21.7% pre- to 45.1% post-implementation (p < 0.001[females]; p = 0.001[males]) (implementation). Post-implementation, elevated initiation rates were retained over the 7 quarters (p = 0.81) (maintenance). CONCLUSIONS: An H-FLS based in two tertiary hospital sites significantly improved use of osteoporosis medications after hip fracture in both males and females.

Economic evaluation of a population-based osteoporosis intervention for outpatients with non-traumatic non-hip fractures: the "Catch a Break" 1i [type C] FLS.

Fracture liaison services (FLS) are advocated to improve osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture, but there are few economic analyses of different models. A population-based 1i [=type C] FLS for non-hip fractures was implemented and it costs $44 per patient and it was very cost-effective ($9200 per QALY gained). Small operational changes would convert it from cost-effective to cost-saving. INTRODUCTION: After fragility fracture, <20% of patients receive osteoporosis treatment. FLS are recommended to address this deficit but there are very few economic analyses of different FLS models. Therefore, we conducted an economic analysis of a 1i (=type C) FLS called "Catch a Break (CaB)." METHODS: CaB is a population-based FLS in Alberta, Canada, that case-finds older outpatients with non-traumatic upper extremity, spine, pelvis, or "other" non-hip fractures and provides telephonic outreach and printed educational materials to patients and their physicians. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using Markov decision-analytic models. Costs were expressed in 2014 Canadian dollars and effectiveness based on model simulations of recurrent fractures and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Perspective was healthcare payer; horizon was lifetime; and costs and benefits were discounted 3%. RESULTS: Over 1 year, CaB enrolled 7323 outpatients (mean age 67 years, 75% female, 69% upper extremity) at average cost of $44 per patient. Compared with usual care, CaB increased rates of bisphosphonate treatment by 4.3 to 17.5% (p < 0.001). Over their lifetime, for every 10,000 patients enrolled in CaB, 4 hip fractures (14 fractures total) would be avoided and 12 QALYs gained. Compared with usual care, incremental cost-effectiveness of CaB was estimated at $9200 per QALY. CaB was cost-effective in 85% of 10,000 probabilistic simulations. Sensitivity analyses showed if "other" fractures were excluded and intervention costs reduced 25% that CaB would become cost-saving. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively inexpensive population-based 1i (=type C) FLS was implemented in Alberta and it was very cost-effective. If CaB excluded "other" fractures and decreased intervention costs by 25%, it would be cost-saving, as would any FLS that was more effective and less expensive.

Clinical challenges in thyroid disease: Time for a new approach?

Thyroid disease is common, and the prevalence is rising. Traditional diagnosis and monitoring relies on thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. This does not always result in symptomatic improvement in hypothyroid symptoms, to the disappointment of both patients and physicians. A non-traditional therapeutic approach would include evaluation of GI function as well as a dietary history and micronutrient evaluation. This approach also includes assessment of thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies, T3, T4, and reverse T3 levels, and in some cases may require specific T3 supplementation in addition to standard T4 therapy. Both high and low TSH levels on treatment are associated with particular medical risks. In the case of high TSH this is primarily cardiac, whereas for low TSH it is predominantly bone health. This article discusses these important clinical issues in more detail, with some practical tips especially for an approach to the "non-responders" to the current traditional therapeutic approach.

Oral bisphosphonates are associated with reduced mortality after hip fracture.

UNLABELLED: Intravenous bisphosphonates reduce mortality following hip fracture. We determined whether new use of oral bisphosphonates was also associated with reductions in mortality in 209 hip fracture patients. Oral bisphosphonate exposure led to relative reduction of 8% per month of use (p = 0.001) or about a 60% reduction in mortality per year of use. INTRODUCTION: Intravenous bisphosphonates reduce mortality following hip fracture. Using prospectively collected long-term data from a randomized trial of osteoporosis quality improvement for hip fracture, we determined whether new use of oral bisphosphonates was associated with reductions in mortality or the composite outcome of death or new fracture. METHODS: Originally, 220 hip fracture patients were randomized to case manager (n = 110) or usual care followed by facilitated bone mineral density (BMD) testing (n = 110) interventions. All were eligible for bisphosphonate treatment. Post-randomization, we followed patients for 3 years and ascertained bisphosphonate treatment, medication adherence and persistence, all-cause mortality, and new clinical fractures. Proportional hazards analyses with time-varying treatment status were undertaken. RESULTS: The final study cohort included 209 patients: 136 (65%) females, 104 (50%) older than 75 years, 90 (43%) with poor self-reported health, and 38 (18%) underweight. Of these, 76 (36%) had a previous fracture before hip fracture and 132 (81%) had low BMD. A total of 101 (46%) patients started oral bisphosphonates and 65 (64%) remained on treatment at the final evaluation. Overall, 24 (11%) patients died, 19 (9%) had new fractures, and 42 (20%) reached the composite outcome of death or fracture. Compared to no treatment, bisphosphonate exposure was independently associated with reduced mortality (17[16%] vs. 7[7%]; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.92 per month treated; 95%CI, 0.88-0.97) and composite endpoints (28[26%] vs. 5[15%]; aHR = 0.94 per month treated; 95%CI, 0.91-0.97). CONCLUSION: Like intravenous bisphosphonates after hip fracture, our study suggests that oral bisphosphonates may be associated with reductions in all-cause mortality.

Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture.

A retrospective chart review was carried out on all consecutive patients over 65 years of age admitted to a tertiary care teaching hospital with a diagnosis of a new hip fracture. A further chart review occurred after discharge from post-surgery rehabilitation. The primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in both phases of the study. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the mortality rates, length of stay, prevalence of osteoporosis investigation, and prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis based on the clinical subspecialty involved. There were 311 patients evaluated in the initial phase, and 226 after rehabilitation. The mortality rate was 5.8% (10% for men, 4% for women; p<0.005) in the acute care hospital and 9.3% (8% men, 10% women) during rehabilitation. Previous hip fracture occurred in 17.4%, and 1.5% were readmitted during the study period with fracture of the opposite hip. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in the acute care hospital on admission in 11.9% and on discharge in 15.4%. In the rehabilitation hospital it was diagnosed in 9.7% on admission and 11.2% on discharge (p=NS). Osteoporosis treatment (including calcium or vitamin D therapy) was instituted in 13% on admission to acute care and in 9.7% at the time of discharge. For the rehabilitation hospital, treatment occurred in 12.8% on admission and 10.2% on discharge. The diagnosis of osteoporosis significantly increased the prevalence of treatment (p<0.001). Use of specific agents (hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates or calcitonin) occurred in <66% of all patients. Osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and under-treated in this group of elderly hip fracture patients. It is associated with significant mortality and morbidity and every effort should be made to prevent future fractures. Physicians in the 'front line' of hip fracture treatment are missing this key aspect of management in their patients. Education of these physicians, as well as the public, may be the key to addressing this care gap.

A prospective evaluation of the awareness, knowledge, risk factors and current treatment of osteoporosis in a cohort of elderly subjects.

This was a prospective cohort study of 145 seniors attending a senior's clinic and social day program using a self-administered questionnaire. Its objective was to evaluate the awareness, knowledge, risk factors and current treatment of osteoporosis in our two patient groups. A secondary objective was to determine differences between the two cohorts, and between men and women. Participants included 39 men and 106 women, with an average age of 76 years. Of these, 89% were aware of osteoporosis and 61% gave the correct definition. Awareness and accurate definition were less in men compared with women (p < 0.01, and p < 0.05) and clinic compared to day program groups (p < 0.01). Only 54% of men knew osteoporosis could affect them. Television, newspapers and friends were identified as the main source of information. Physicians ranked as fifth as a source of information. In all, 84% knew diet was important. Prevalence of risk factors other than age were < 20%, except for senescence (38%) and alcohol use (40%). Utilization of specific therapies for osteoporosis was only 18% overall with a rate of 3% in men (p < 0.01). In women, 50% and were taking calcium supplements compared with 15% men (p < 0.001) and for multivitamins the figures were 57% and 33% respectively (p < 0.05). These results show a high level of awareness and correct definition of osteoporosis in this cohort of patients. Specific therapy for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis was inappropriately low in the face of high risk. This study highlights the care gap in osteoporosis in seniors and the need for increased physician involvement in patient education and treatment. Proactive treatment requests from patients need to be encouraged, especially with the future demographic shift.

Prevalence and disease associations of certain autoantibodies in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and association with various diseases of certain autoantibodies among elderly patients, in order to challenge the hypothesis that these autoantibodies are elevated generally in these patients as a result of immunosenescence. DESIGN: Prospective prevalence study. PATIENTS: A total of 399 elderly patients: 63 aging successfully (without chronic illness), 301 with a variety of chronic general illnesses (frail elderly) and 35 with a clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. These were compared with 250 healthy adult blood donors. INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of autoantibodies to rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, double-stranded (native) DNA (nDNA), extractable nuclear antigens and anticardiolipin antibodies. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of these autoantibodies and correlation with disease states. RESULTS: Antibodies to rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody were significantly more prevalent in the elderly patients with chronic illness or rheumatoid arthritis but were not disease-specific. The prevalence of nDNA and extractable nuclear antigens was not increased in either the healthy or frail elderly groups. Anticardiolipin antibodies were significantly more prevalent in the frail elderly group when compared with normal controls and the healthy elderly group. The prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies correlated with clinical features of cerebrovascular disease, in particular multi-infarct dementia and stroke, but not with Alzheimer's disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the autoantibodies measured was not elevated in healthy elderly subjects, and autoantibodies such as nDNA and extractable nuclear antigens are specific to disease states in all groups of elderly patients. Anticardiolipin antibodies correlate with cerebrovascular events. Therefore, the clinical significance of autoantibodies in elderly patients is related more to global health status than to the effects of aging.

Prevalence of selected autoantibodies in different elderly subpopulations.

We have evaluated the prevalence of selected autoantibodies commonly utilized in rheumatologic practice in different elderly subpopulations grouped according to their clinical status. RF, ANA, double-stranded DNA antibodies, and antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) were measured in the serum of all participants using standardized laboratory assays. One hundred and fifty-nine elderly subjects were enrolled, of whom 63 were classified as successfully aging elderly, 62 were ambulatory chronically ill residents of a nursing or Veterans home and 34 were patients attending an RA clinic. Prevalence of autoantibodies were compared to healthy adult blood donors. There was no statistically significant increase in autoantibodies in successfully aging elderly compared to healthy young controls. RF, ANA and ENA antibodies were significantly increased in only the chronically ill and RA sufferers. Antibodies to nDNA were absent in all groups. We conclude that autoantibodies commonly utilized in rheumatological practice are not globally non-specifically increased as a result of aging, but increase in prevalence in chronically ill elderly. Therefore assessment of health status is necessary to evaluate the clinical significance of these autoantibodies in the elderly.