[Development of a set of nursing-sensitive indicators for Swiss practice]. / Die Entwicklung eines Sets von aufwandrelevanten Pflege-indikatoren für die Schweizer Pflegepraxis.

BACKGROUND: The SwissDRG prospective payment system is known to inadequately account for nursing intensity due to the DRG group criteria insufficiently describing the variability of nursing intensity within individual diagnosis-related groups. In order to allow for appropriate reimbursement and resource allocation, nursing intensity must be able to be explicitly quantified and accounted for. The aim of this project was to develop a set of nursing-sensitive indicators intended to reduce the variation within individual diagnosis-related groups, supplementary to existing SwissDRG group criteria. METHODS: The approach comprised a variety of methods. A systematic literature review, input from an advisory board and an expert panel, as well as three focus group interviews with nurses and nurse managers formed the basis for the synthesis of data and information gathered from these sources. RESULTS: A set of 14 nursing-sensitive indicators was developed. The indicators are intended to improve the homogeneity of nursing intensity within SwissDRG diagnosis-related groups. Before these nursing indicators can be adopted as group criteria, they must be formulated to conform with SwissDRG and tested empirically. CONCLUSION: This set of indicators can be seen at as a first step towards nursing intensity being adequately represented in SwissDRG diagnosis-related groups. The next challenge to be met is operationalising the indicators in codable form.

Impact of an outbreak of norovirus infection on hospital resources.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a nosocomial norovirus outbreak, its management, and its financial impact on hospital resources. DESIGN: A matched case-control study and microbiological investigation. METHODS: We compared 16 patients with norovirus infection with control-patients matched by age, gender, disease category, and length of stay. Bed occupancy-days during the peak incidence period of the outbreak were compared with the corresponding periods in 2001 and 2002. Expenses due to increased workload were calculated based on a measuring system that records time spent for nursing care per patient per day. RESULTS: The attack rates were 13.9% among patients and 29.5% among healthcare workers. The median number of occupied beds was significantly lower due to bed closure during the peak incidence in 2003 (29) compared with the median number of occupied beds in 2001 and 2002 combined (42.5). Based on this difference and a daily charge of 562.50 dollars per patient, we calculated a revenue loss of 37,968 dollars. Additional expenses totaled 10,300 dollars for increased nursing care. Extra costs for microbiological diagnosis totaled 2707 dollars. Lost productivity costs due to healthcare workers on sick leave totaled 12,807 dollars. The expenses for work by the infection control team totaled 1408 dollars. The financial impact of this outbreak on hospital resources comprising loss of revenue and extra costs for microbiological diagnosis but without lost productivity costs, increased nursing care, and expenses for the infection control team totaled 40,675 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial norovirus outbreaks result in significant loss of revenue and increased use of resources. Bed closures had a greater impact on hospital resources than increased need for nursing care