RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the impact on health-related quality of life of functional electrical stimulation used to improve walking in people with multiple sclerosis and to explore cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patient records was conducted. SETTING: This study used outpatient therapy service as the study setting. SUBJECTS: Data from 82 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis attending for set up with functional electrical stimulation were analysed. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were seen at baseline, three and six months for support in use of functional electrical stimulation, and data were collected at baseline and six months. MAIN MEASURES: The EQ-5D-5L and walking speed were collected at baseline and six months after using functional electrical stimulation. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale was collected at six months. EQ-5D-3L utilities were derived and cost-effectiveness analysis was completed utilizing a five-year time horizon and methodology published by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.001) were seen in walking speed (baseline 0.670 m/s; with stimulation 0.768 m/s) and maintained over six months (0.772 m/s with stimulation). EQ-5D data significantly improved over six months (baseline 0.486, six months 0.596, P < 0.001) and meaningful mean scores were seen in all aspects of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale. However, there were no correlations between measures. In the cost utility analysis, compared to standard care, functional electrical stimulation was more expensive and more effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £6137. CONCLUSION: Functional electrical stimulation is a cost-effective treatment to improve walking speed and health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis.
