The prevalence of radiological glenohumeral osteoarthritis in long-term type 1 diabetes: the Dialong shoulder study.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the prevalence of radiological osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) for > 45 years and controls, and explores the association with shoulder pain and glycaemic burden in patients with DM1. METHOD: The Dialong study is a cross-sectional, observational study with 30 years of historical data on long-term glycaemic control. We included 102 patients with DM1 and 73 diabetes-free controls. Demographic data, worst shoulder pain last week [numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10], pain on abduction at examination (NRS 0-10), and current and historical glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were collected. Standardized shoulder X-rays were taken and interpreted for OA applying the Kellgren-Lawrence classification. RESULTS: In the diabetes group (49% women), the mean ± sd duration of DM1 was 50.6 ± 4.8 years, mean 30 year HbA1c 7.4%, and age 61.9 ± 7.1 years. The mean age of controls (57% women) was 62.6 ± 7.0 years. Radiological glenohumeral OA was found in 36 diabetes patients (35%) and 10 controls (14%) [odds ratio (OR) 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 7.5; p = 0.002]. Few persons had moderate and severe OA [6.9% vs 1.3%, OR 5.3 (95% Cl 0.6 to 44.1); p = 0.1]. Fifteen diabetes patients had painful OA versus two controls (adjusted OR 5.4, 95% CI 0.6 to 47.9; p = 0.13). There was no association between OA and long-term glycaemic burden (mean 30 year HbA1c) in the diabetes group (p > 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Radiological glenohumeral OA was more common in patients with DM1 than in controls for mild, but not moderate and severe OA. The radiological findings were not associated with shoulder pain or long-term glycaemic burden.

[Is exercise therapy and manipulation effective in low back pain?]. / Har treningsterapi og manipulasjon effekt ved korsryggssmerter?

We evaluated the effectiveness of exercises and manipulation on pain, disability and sick leave in a systematic review of randomized controlled trials including patients with low back pain. Low back pain is commonly a self-limiting illness and most patients are free of symptoms within 14 days. On the basis of 11 studies, no additional benefits from exercises and manipulation were found in patients with acute complaints (0-4 weeks); thus, our results do not support guidelines that prescribe manipulation in the acute stage. One study found reduced disability and sick leave in the subacute stage (4-12 weeks) when patients were told that it was safe to move and this strategy was reinforced by a graded exercise program and visits to the workplace. Seven studies evaluated manipulation; the effectiveness was no better than other treatments or placebo. Based on seven studies in patients with chronic low back pain (> 12 weeks), there is strong evidence that exercises reduce disability and pain, but their effectiveness on sick leave is not documented. Four studies compared different exercise regimens, but found no evidence in favour of one particular method. The effectiveness of manipulation in patients with chronic pain is poorly documented.

CT-diskography, diskomanometry and MR imaging as predictors of the outcome of lumbar percutaneous automated nucleotomy.

PURPOSE: This prospective study was performed to assess whether CT-diskography (CT-D), diskomanometry (DMM) including recording of the pain response, or the MR signal intensity of the disks are reliable predictors of the outcome of nucleotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-one patients, 44 females and 47 males aged 18-68 years (mean 37.4) treated at 99 disk levels were included. All had plain CT, MR imaging, CT-D and DMM performed prior to automated percutaneous nucleotomy with the Nucleotomy R system. RESULTS: Sixty-nine (76%) of the patients responded well to treatment within 3 months. Due to recurrences, the success rate at 1 year was reduced to 65%. Except for better results following nucleotomy in patients with similar and identical pain as the presenting complaint provoked at diskography, no association was demonstrated between diskographic parameters, or loss of signal on MR, and the outcome. Better results were also seen in patients with a short history of disk disease, but not in patients with predominantly sciatica and focal hernias compared to those with predominantly low-back pain and diffuse posterior bulges. CONCLUSION: The results do not justify routine use of diskography prior to nucleotomy in patients with pathologic disks demonstrated by noninvasive methods and localizing sciatic pain.

Clinical results after percutaneous automated lumbar nucleotomy. A follow-up study.

This study was carried out in order to assess the clinical results after percutaneous automated nucleotomy with regard to predictive factors for the outcome. Selection criteria included patients with predominance of low-back pain, diffuse posterior disk bulges and concomitant spinal stenosis who are not normally accepted for nucleotomy. In all, 142 patients were treated. The overall success rate after an average observation time of 21 months was 56%. The results were not influenced by whether a diffuse posterior bulge or a focal hernia had been treated or not (p = 0.449). Spinal stenosis (p = 0.043) and disk space narrowing exceeding 25% of the expected width (p = 0.017) were associated with a poor outcome. By excluding these categories and patients with symptoms from more than one disk level, the success rate rose to 70%. With this selection, the results were equally good in patients with predominantly low-back pain compared to those with predominantly sciatica (p = 0.490).