RESUMO
Recent experimental studies show that emotions can have a significant effect on the way we think, decide, and solve problems. This paper presents a series of four experiments on how emotions affect logical reasoning. In two experiments different groups of participants first had to pass a manipulated intelligence test. Their emotional state was altered by giving them feedback, that they performed excellent, poor or on average. Then they completed a set of logical inference problems (with if p, then q statements) either in a Wason selection task paradigm or problems from the logical propositional calculus. Problem content also had either a positive, negative or neutral emotional value. Results showed a clear effect of emotions on reasoning performance. Participants in negative mood performed worse than participants in positive mood, but both groups were outperformed by the neutral mood reasoners. Problem content also had an effect on reasoning performance. In a second set of experiments, participants with exam or spider phobia solved logical problems with contents that were related to their anxiety disorder (spiders or exams). Spider phobic participants' performance was lowered by the spider-content, while exam anxious participants were not affected by the exam-related problem content. Overall, unlike some previous studies, no evidence was found that performance is improved when emotion and content are congruent. These results have consequences for cognitive reasoning research and also for cognitively oriented psychotherapy and the treatment of disorders like depression and anxiety.
RESUMO
AIMS: To examine adaptation to progressive addition lenses (PALs) by investigating eye and head movement strategies of individuals naïve to PAL wear; to determine whether adaptation is a short-term change in strategy or is maintained with continued PAL wear; to determine if adaptation strategies are different between PAL designs. METHODS: Ten presbyopic individuals participated in a double-blind crossover study. Participants wore one PAL design for < or = 4 weeks, had approximately 1 week without PAL wear and then wore the second PAL for < or = 4 weeks. Eye and head movements were recorded at the beginning and end of each period of PAL wear in response to several visual tasks. Visual tasks were a flash discrimination task at 2 m and 40 cm, and reading text aloud. Quantitative analysis was undertaken for eye and head movement dynamics (latency, duration, peak velocity, etc.). Categorical analysis used eye and head movement metrics to classify participants as eye-movers, head-movers or mixed at each visit. RESULTS: There was significant between-participant variability. A number of eye/head movement parameters exhibited carry-over effects. The number of vertical head movements for the distance task showed a significant increase between the first and second visit (F(1,9) = 5.578; p = 0.042), irrespective of lens design. Categorical analysis showed that participants employed task dependent strategies for all tasks. Participants that altered their strategy tended to include more head movements. Seven of the 10 participants preferred the second PAL worn. CONCLUSIONS: Participants recruited more head movements for flash discrimination tasks and for reading text during adaptation to PAL wear. The many and various eye and head movement parameters analysed were unable to discriminate differences dependent on PAL design.
