Benzoyl peroxide treatment decreases Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery, from skin incision until wound closure.

INTRODUCTION: Most surgical site infections after shoulder surgery are caused by Cutibacterium acnes. Topically applied benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has for years been used to decrease the skin load of C acnes in treatment of acne vulgaris. The purpose of this study was to examine this effect on bacterial colonization in patients subjected to elective shoulder surgery at different stages of the procedure. METHODS: A total of 100 patients scheduled for primary elective open shoulder surgery were randomized to prepare either with BPO or according to local guidelines-with soap (control group). Four skin swabs were taken in a standardized manner at different times, before and after surgical skin preparation, 1 in dermis, and finally after the skin was sutured. Before skin incision, 5 punch biopsies (3 mm in diameter and maximum 4 mm deep) were retrieved spaced 2 cm apart in the planned skin incision. On culturing, quantification of C acnes was made by serial dilutions. RESULTS: Men had a 5-fold higher amount of C acnes on untreated skin. Treatment with BPO considerably lowered this count (P = .0001) both before and after skin disinfection compared to the control group. This positive effect of BPO persisted until skin closure, the point at which some recolonization of C acnes had occurred, but to a higher degree in the control group (P = .040). CONCLUSION: Preoperative BPO treatment of the shoulder may be an effective method to decrease bacterial skin load of C acnes from skin incision until wound closure.

Optimization of 16S rRNA gene analysis for use in the diagnostic clinical microbiology service.

Broad-range amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, directly from clinical samples, is a method that potentially allows detection of any cultivable or non-cultivable bacteria. However, the method is prone to false positive results due to PCR contamination. Another concern is the human DNA abundance compared to bacterial DNA in samples from sterile sites. Those factors may decrease the sensitivity and specificity of the assay and can complicate the analysis and interpretation of the results. The objective of this prospective study was to try to avoid the most common pitfalls, mentioned above, and develop a molecular 16S assay with a high clinical sensitivity and specificity. Fifty-six consecutive tissue samples from patients with suspected deep infections were extracted by 3 different DNA-extraction methods; two based on a principle of bacterial DNA enrichment, and one conventional DNA extraction method. We compared three primer pairs, including both conventional and DPO principle, targeting different variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Results from routine tissue culture were used as reference. Clinical data was recorded from patient charts and analyzed in parallel. Of a total of 56 samples, collected from 39 patients, 70% (39 samples) were assessed as true infections by analysis of clinical data. Bacterial enrichment extraction increased sensitivity from 54% to 72%. The 2 sets of primer pairs defining region V1-V3 and V3-V4, showed similar sensitivity, but DPO-primers resulted in better specificity, i.e. less contaminations. The primer pairs covering V1-V8 show significantly lower sensitivity (p < .001) than V1-V3 and V3-V4. Optimizing extraction protocols and choice of primers can increase the sensitivity and specificity of a molecular 16S-analysis, rendering a valuable complement to tissue culture.