Efficacy and safety of hydroxyethyl starch 6% 130/0.4 in a balanced electrolyte solution (Volulyte) during cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The infusion of large amounts of saline-based solutions may contribute to the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and the use of a balanced carrier for colloid solutions might improve postoperative acid-base status. The equivalence of 2 hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions and the influence on chloride levels and acid-base status by selectively changing the carrier of rapidly degradable modern 6% HES 130/0.4 were studied in cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: A clinical study in 2 cardiac surgery institutions. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one patients. INTERVENTION: Patients received either 6% HES130/0.4 balanced (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) or 6% HES130/0.4 saline (Voluven; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) for intra- and postoperative hemodynamic stabilization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The therapeutic equivalence of both HES formulations regarding volume effect and superiority of the balanced electrolyte solution regarding serum chloride levels and acid-base status were measured. Similar volumes of both HES 130/0.4 balanced and HES 130/0.4 saline were administered until 6 hours after surgery, 2,391 ± 518 mL in the HES 130/0.4 balanced group versus 2,241 ± 512 mL in the HES 130/0.4 saline group. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between treatments (-77; 377 mL; mean, 150 mL) was contained entirely in the predefined interval (-500, 500 mL), thereby proving equivalence. The serum chloride level (mmol/L) was lower (p < 0.05 at the end of surgery), and arterial pH was higher in the balanced group at all time points except baseline, and base excess was less negative at all time points after baseline (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Volumes of HES needed for hemodynamic stabilization were equivalent between treatment groups. Significantly lower serum chloride levels in the HES balanced group reflected the lower chloride load of similar infusion volumes. The HES balanced group had significantly less acidosis.

The effects of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) on blood loss and use of blood products in major surgery: a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The effects of different types of hydroxylethyl starch (HES) on blood coagulation closely depend on their physicochemical properties. HES with lower molar substitution and a lower in vivo molecular weight interferes relatively little with hemostasis and therefore results in lower perioperative blood losses and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed pooled data from all available studies in major surgery comparing 6% HES 130/0.4 and 6% HES 200/0.5 from waxy maize starch. METHODS: Estimated blood loss, drainage loss, calculated blood loss, transfused blood product volumes, and coagulation variables were examined for 24 h after the start of surgery. Groups were compared using analysis of variance, evaluating several covariates. RESULTS: Four-hundred-forty-nine patients from seven clinical trials were analyzed, 228 received HES 130/0.4, and 221 received HES 200/0.5. For HES 130/0.4 patients, when compared to HES 200/0.5 patients, the estimated blood loss was reduced by 404 mL [P = 0.006], drainage loss was 272 mL less [P = 0.009], and calculated RBC loss was 149 mL less [P = 0.003]. RBC transfusion volumes were also lower for HES 130/0.4 by 137 mL [P = 0.004]. In the early postoperative phase, HES 130/0.4 was found to exert significantly less effect on measures of coagulation, especially activated partial thromboplastin time and von Willebrand factor (antigen and ristocetin cofactor), than HES 200/0.5. CONCLUSIONS: Blood loss and transfusion requirements can be significantly reduced in major surgery when using third generation HES 130/0.4 (Voluven) compared to second generation waxy maize starch HES 200/0.5. Since HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 were found similar regarding volume efficacy in other studies, HES 130/0.4 is recommended in this clinical setting.

Volume replacement therapy during major orthopedic surgery using Voluven (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4) or hetastarch.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to test the equivalence of efficacy and compare the safety of the 6% hydroxyethyl starches (HES) Voluven (HES 130/0.4; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) and hetastarch (HES 670/0.75 in saline) for intravascular volume replacement therapy during major orthopedic surgery. METHODS: In a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, 49 patients were treated with HES 130/0.4 and 51 patients were treated with hetastarch. Infusion of colloids was guided by central venous and arterial blood pressures. The primary efficacy endpoint was the volume of colloid solution infused; the primary safety endpoints were calculated total erythrocyte loss, the nadir factor VIII activity, and the nadir von Willebrand factor concentration within 2 h of completion of surgery. RESULTS: The total volume of colloid solution required for intraoperative volume replacement did not differ between HES 130/0.4 and hetastarch (1,613+/-778 [SD] ml for HES 130/0.4 and 1,584+/-958 ml for hetastarch). The nadir factor VIII activity within 2 h of the end of surgery was lower for hetastarch than for HES 130/0.4 (P=0.0499); for those who received greater than 1,000 ml colloid, the nadir factor VIII activity and von Willebrand factor concentration within 2 h of end of surgery were lower for hetastarch than for HES 130/0.4 (P=0.0487 and P=0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: Voluven (HES 130/0.4) and hetastarch are equally efficacious plasma volume substitutes; however, HES 130/0.4 has a lesser effect on coagulation.

Pharmacokinetics of hydroxyethyl starch.

Hydroxyethyl starch has recently become the subject of renewed interest because of the introduction of a new specification, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, as well as the clinical availability of a solution using a previous hydroxyethyl starch type (hydroxyethyl starch 670/0.75) with a carrier other than 0.9% saline. Various types of hydroxyethyl starch show different pharmacokinetic behaviour. Since hydroxyethyl starch is a polydisperse solution acting as a colloid, pharmacodynamic action depends on the number of oncotically active molecules, not on the plasma concentration alone; therefore, solutions with a lower in vivo molecular weight contain more molecules at similar plasma concentrations. On the other hand, high plasma concentrations as well as high in vivo molecular weight can affect blood coagulation, especially factor VIII and von Willebrand factor. Hydroxyethyl starch types with a molar substitution >0.4 accumulate in plasma after repetitive administration, most pronounced with hetastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 670/0.75). Correspondingly, tissue storage as measured by (14)C tracer studies in animals showed significantly higher values for hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 compared with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (about 4-fold at the latest timepoint after the last administration), and considerably higher values for hetastarch compared with both hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and 200/0.5. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 does not accumulate in plasma after single- and multiple-dose administration in contrast to all other available hydroxyethyl starch specifications. Plasma clearance of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 is at least 20-fold higher than that for hetastarch, and considerably higher than for pentastarch. In patients with renal insufficiency, pharmacokinetic data are only available for hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4. Cumulative urinary excretion, even in the presence of severe non-anuric renal failure, is higher for hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 than values published for older hydroxyethyl starch specifications. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 may be given to patients with severe renal impairment as long as urine flow is preserved. The pharmacodynamics with respect to the volume effect does not directly mirror pharmacokinetics in the case of hydroxyethyl starch solutions. Equivalent volume efficacy has been proven for hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 compared with 200/0.5. Prolonged persistence of hydroxyethyl starch in plasma and tissues can be avoided by using rapidly metabolisable hydroxyethyl starch types with molar substitution <0.5. Influence on coagulation is minimal with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, and no adverse effects on kidney function have been observed even with large repetitive doses when used according to the product information.

Volume efficacy and reduced influence on measures of coagulation using hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) with an optimised in vivo molecular weight in orthopaedic surgery : a randomised, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Different types of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) affect blood coagulation differently. We studied the effects of HES 130/0.4 on coagulation in major orthopaedic surgery in relation to the pharmacological parameter in vivo molecular weight. METHODS: 52 patients were randomly allocated to either HES 130/0.4 (6%, mean molecular weight 130 kDa, molar substitution 0.4) or HES 200/0.5 (6%, control) in a double-blind fashion. Colloidal volume requirements for intra- and postoperative haemodynamic stabilisation were compared. Safety analyses of this pharmacological study included a comparison of coagulation factor tests, in vivo molecular weight, and HES plasma concentrations. RESULTS: The colloidal volumes given were similar at the end of surgery (1602 +/- 569 for HES 130/0.4 vs 1635 +/- 567mL for HES 200/0.5), 5h later (1958 +/- 467 vs 1962 +/- 398mL), and up to the first postoperative day (2035 +/- 446 vs 2000 +/- 424mL). HES in vivo molecular weight at the end of surgery was 88,707 +/- 13,938 versus 158,374 +/- 33,933Da (p < 0.001) and 5h later was 86,663 +/- 16,126 versus 136,299 +/- 26,208Da (p < 0.001). In parallel to the lower in vivo molecular weight, factor VIII and von Willebrand factor returned to almost normal in the HES 130/0.4 group up to 5h postoperatively, but not in the control group (p < 0.05). Residual HES plasma concentrations after 24h were low in the HES 130/0.4 group (1.0 mg/mL), but higher in the control group (2.6 mg/mL). CONCLUSION: HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 were found to be similar with regard to volume efficacy. Sensitive coagulation parameters returned more rapidly to normal in the HES 130/0.4 group. Lower in vivo molecular weight and more rapid excretion of HES 130/0.4 are the likely explanations for the smaller influence on coagulation in this group.

Repetitive large-dose infusion of the novel hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in patients with severe head injury.

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, controlled, randomized, single-center study, we investigated the safety of repetitive large-dose infusion of a novel hydroxyethyl starch solution (6% HES 130/0.4) in cranio-cerebral trauma patients. Patients were randomized to receive either HES 130/0.4 (n = 16) at repetitive doses of up to 70 mL x kg(-1) x d(-1) (which is the largest HES dose reported in the literature) or the control HES 200/0.5 (n = 15) up to its approved dose limit of 33 mL x kg(-1) x d(-1) followed by human albumin up to a total dose (HES 200/0.5 + albumin) of 70 mL x kg(-1) x d(-1). We found no differences between groups in mortality, renal function, bleeding complications, and use of blood products. There were also no major differences in coagulation variables. However, at some time points, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and ristocetin cofactor were higher in the HES 130/0.4 group despite the large HES doses administered. We conclude that HES 130/0.4 can safely be used in critically ill head trauma patients over several days at doses of up to 70 mL x kg(-1) x d(-1). IMPLICATIONS: There are concerns that infusion of certain hydroxyethyl starch (HES) types for plasma volume expansion may influence coagulation and renal function. We investigated the safety of the novel HES 130/0.4 in patients with severe cranio-cerebral trauma. The repetitive HES doses administered in this study are the largest reported in the literature.

The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of an intravenous infusion of the new hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%, 500 mL) in mild-to-severe renal impairment.

UNLABELLED: Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) are almost exclusively excreted glomerularly, in part after hydrolysis by amylase. HES 130/0.4 (Voluven; Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) was developed to improve pharmacokinetics whereas preserving the efficacy of volume effect. We studied the dependency of pharmacokinetics of HES 130/0.4 on renal function. Nineteen volunteers with stable, non-anuric renal dysfunction, ranging from almost normal creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) to severe renal impairment (mean CL(cr): 50.6 mL. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2)), were given a single infusion of 500 mL 6% HES 130/0.4 over 30 min. HES plasma concentrations were determined until 72 h, urinary excretion until 72-96 h. CL(cr) had been obtained at least twice before and twice after dosing. Standard pharmacokinetic calculations and regression analysis were performed. Area under the time concentration curve (AUC(0-inf)) clearly depended on renal function comparing subjects with CL(cr) < 50 with those with CL(cr) > or =50 (ratio 1.73). Peak concentration (C(max), 4.34 mg/mL) as well as terminal half-life (16.1 h, model independent) were not affected by renal impairment. At CL(cr) > or =30, 59% of the drug could be retrieved in urine, versus 51% at CL(cr) 15-<30. The mean molecular weight of HES in plasma was 62,704 d at 30 min, showing lower values with increased renal impairment (P = 0.04). Pre-dose amylase concentrations inversely correlated with baseline CL(cr). Residual HES plasma concentrations after 24 h were small in all subjects (< or =0.6 mg/mL). We conclude that HES 130/0.4 (500 mL 6%) can be safely administered to patients even with severe renal impairment, as long as urine flow is preserved, without plasma accumulation. IMPLICATIONS: Dependency of the pharmacokinetics of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on renal function was studied. The area under the time concentration curve increased moderately with more severe renal dysfunction; however, small plasma concentrations were observed after 24 h. Terminal half-life and peak concentration remained unaffected by renal impairment.