A Global Survey of Reproductive Specialists to Determine the Clinical Utility of Oxidative Stress Testing and Antioxidant Use in Male Infertility.

PURPOSE: The use of antioxidants is common practice in the management of infertile patients. However, there are no established guidelines by professional societies on antioxidant use for male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an online survey, this study aimed to evaluate the practice pattern of reproductive specialists to determine the clinical utility of oxidative stress (OS) testing and antioxidant prescriptions to treat male infertility. RESULTS: Responses from 1,327 participants representing 6 continents, showed the largest participant representation being from Asia (46.8%). The majority of participants were attending physicians (59.6%), with 61.3% having more than 10 years of experience in the field of male infertility. Approximately two-thirds of clinicians (65.7%) participated in this survey did not order any diagnostic tests for OS. Sperm DNA fragmentation was the most common infertility test beyond a semen analysis that was prescribed to study oxidative stress-related dysfunctions (53.4%). OS was mainly tested in the presence of lifestyle risk factors (24.6%) or sperm abnormalities (16.3%). Interestingly, antioxidants were prescribed by 85.6% of clinicians, for a duration of 3 (43.7%) or 3-6 months (38.6%). A large variety of antioxidants and dietary supplements were prescribed, and scientific evidence were mostly considered to be modest to support their clinical use. Results were not influenced by the physician's age, geographic origin, experience or training in male infertility. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest online survey performed to date on this topic and demonstrates 1) a worldwide understanding of the importance of this therapeutic option, and 2) a widely prevalent use of antioxidants to treat male infertility. Finally, the necessity of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines from professional societies is highlighted.

Benefits of Empiric Nutritional and Medical Therapy for Semen Parameters and Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in Couples with Idiopathic Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Empiric use of medical and nutritional supplements to improve semen parameters and pregnancy rates in couples with idiopathic infertility has reached global proportions, although the evidence base for their use in this setting is controversial. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed evidence comparing the benefits of nutritional and medical therapy on pregnancy rates and semen parameters in men with idiopathic infertility. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library (searched from January 1, 1990 to September 19, 2017). using the methods detailed in the Cochrane Handbook. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The literature search identified 5663 citations, and after screening of abstracts and full texts, 61 studies (59 randomised controlled trials and two nonrandomised comparative studies) were included. Pooled results demonstrated that pentoxyfylline, coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, follicle-stimulating hormone, tamoxifen, and kallikrein all resulted in improvements in semen parameters. Individual studies identified several other medical and nutritional therapies that improved semen parameters, but data were limited to individual studies with inherent methodological flaws. There were limited data available on live birth and pregnancy rates for all interventions. The GRADE certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low mainly owing to methodological flaws and inconsistencies in study design. Some outcomes were also downgraded owing to imprecision of results. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that empiric medical and nutritional supplements may improve semen parameters. There is very limited evidence that empiric therapy leads to better live birth rates, spontaneous pregnancy, or pregnancy following assisted-reproductive techniques. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution as there were some methodological flaws, as a number of studies were judged to be either at high or unclear risk of bias for many domains. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review identified several medical and nutritional treatments, such as pentoxyfylline, coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, follicle-stimulating hormone, tamoxifen, and kallikrein, that appear to improve semen parameters. However, there are limited data suggesting improvements in pregnancy and live birth rates. The lack of evidence can be attributed to methodological flaws in studies and the low number of pregnancies reported.

The effect of vasectomy on the sexual life of couples.

INTRODUCTION: There are several contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy, reversible as well as nonreversible ones. The sexual satisfaction of couples is affected by many types of contraceptives used. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the effect of vasectomy on the sexual life and satisfaction of couples. METHODS: Seventy-six couples took part in this evaluation and filled out respective questionnaires before and after vasectomy. All the questionnaires were evaluated statistically for differences in the respective sexual domain scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized questionnaires were used. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) as well as postoperative pain score were completed by men. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was completed by the female partner. For statistical analysis, the T-Square Test was used. RESULTS: The average age of couples, who chose the vasectomy procedure, was 37 years for women and 39 years for men. The contraception method most frequently used prior to the vasectomy was the birth control pill. For the male partner, the IIEF showed no significant change in the respective domains. Out of the 76 couples, 93% of the males and 96% of their female partners would recommend and do vasectomy again. The postoperative pain score was 3.5 on 0-10 scale, and there were no postoperative complications reported. The best improvement of the sexual function was noticed for the female partners. The FSFI showed a significant improvement in the domains desire (P < 0.05), arousal (P < 0.05), orgasm (P < 0.05), lubrication (P < 0.05), and satisfaction (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first report to our very best knowledge that showed the positive impact of vasectomy on sexual satisfaction of couples. Vasectomy is a safe operation with minimal complication rates.

Tadalafil once daily improves ejaculatory function, erectile function, and sexual satisfaction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction: results from a randomized, placebo- and tamsulosin-controlled, 12-week double-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: Tadalafil, a long-acting phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is approved for treating signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED); tamsulosin, an alpha-blocker, is approved for treating signs and symptoms of BPH. AIM: To determine the effects of tadalafil or tamsulosin on sexual function, including ejaculation and orgasm, satisfaction, and erectile function, in sexually active men with ED and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of BPH (LUTS/BPH). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tadalafil 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks in men with LUTS/BPH; tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily was an active control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was administered at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Analysis of orgasm and ejaculation was post hoc based on the IIEF-Orgasmic Function (OF) domain (IIEF-Q9 [ejaculatory frequency] and Q10 [orgasmic frequency]). Other measures included IIEF-Intercourse Satisfaction (IS), Overall Satisfaction (OS), and Erectile Function (EF) domains. Changes from baseline to 12 weeks (or last observation) vs. placebo were analyzed using analysis of covariance. Higher IIEF scores indicate better functioning. RESULTS: Of 511 study participants, 310 (60.7%) had ED and were sexually active. The IIEF-OF increased significantly through 12 weeks with tadalafil vs. placebo (P = 0.048), as did IIEF-Q9 (P = 0.045) but not IIEF-Q10 (P = 0.100). Compared with placebo, IIEF-OF, Q9, and Q10 decreased significantly with tamsulosin (all P < 0.05). The IIEF-IS and OS increased significantly at end point with tadalafil (both P < 0.001); for tamsulosin, change was not significant for IS, while OS decreased significantly (P = 0.009). The IIEF-EF domain increased significantly vs. placebo with tadalafil (P < 0.001) but not tamsulosin (P = 0.699). CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 5 mg once daily significantly improved ejaculation and orgasm, intercourse and overall satisfaction, and erectile function. Men receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily experienced a decrease in both ejaculatory/orgasmic frequency and overall satisfaction vs. placebo, with no significant effect on erectile function.

European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update.

CONTEXT: New data regarding the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility have emerged and led to an update of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for Male Infertility. OBJECTIVE: To review the new EAU guidelines for Male Infertility. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive work-up of the literature obtained from Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Systematic Reviews, and reference lists in publications and review articles was developed and screened by a group of urologists and andrologists appointed by the EAU Guidelines Committee. Previous recommendations based on the older literature on this subject were taken into account. Levels of evidence and grade of guideline recommendations were added, modified from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. EVIDENCE SUMMARY: These EAU guidelines are a short comprehensive overview of the updated guidelines of male infertility as recently published by the EAU (http://www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/), and they are also available in the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guideline.gov/).

European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy.

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology presents its guidelines for vasectomy. Vasectomy is highly effective, but problems can arise that are related to insufficient preoperative patient information, the surgical procedure, and postoperative follow-up. OBJECTIVE: These guidelines aim to provide information and recommendations for physicians who perform vasectomies and to promote the provision of adequate information to the patient before the operation to prevent unrealistic expectations and legal procedures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An extensive review of the literature was carried out using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1980 to 2010. The focus was on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs (level 1 evidence) and on well-designed studies without randomisation (level 2 and 3 evidence). A total of 113 unique records were identified for consideration. Non-English language publications were excluded as well as studies published as abstracts only or reports from meetings. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The guidelines discuss indications and contraindications for vasectomy, preoperative patient information and counselling, surgical techniques, postoperative care and subsequent semen analysis, and complications and late consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Vasectomy is intended to be a permanent form of contraception. There are no absolute contraindications for vasectomy. Relative contraindications may be the absence of children, age <30 yr, severe illness, no current relationship, and scrotal pain. Preoperative counselling should include alternative methods of contraception, complication and failure rates, and the need for postoperative semen analysis. Informed consent should be obtained before the operation. Although the use of mucosal cautery and fascial interposition have been shown to reduce early failure compared to simple ligation and excision of a small vas segment, no robust data show that a particular vasectomy technique is superior in terms of prevention of late recanalisation and spontaneous pregnancy after vasectomy. After semen analysis, clearance can be given in case of documented azoospermia and in case of rare nonmotile spermatozoa in the ejaculate at least 3 mo after the procedure.

[Erectile dysfunction]. / Erektile Dysfunktion.

Erectile Dysfunction is one of the most prevalent sexual disorders in men. According to the current literature the prevalence is about 16% for all men. The diagnostic workup of a patient suffering from E.D. is a detailed anamnesis, a physical and endocrinological evaluation and the suggestion of the optimal therapeutic treatment. The therapeutic application of PDE-5 inhibitors has made the therapy of E.D. much easier. It is a safe and highly efficient therapeutic option. But man must not forget that in severe cases of erectile dysfunction, the application of SKAT therapy, penile implants or vacuum devices might be necessary. Since a functioning sex life is important not only for the men, but also for the couple, a more open attitude of us, physicians, is desirable to help more men who suffer from this sexual dysfunction.

Clinical experience with Andriol Testocaps--the first Austrian surveillance study on the treatment of late-onset hypogonadism.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document the efficacy and tolerability of the new formulation of Andriol Testocaps in the treatment of late-onset hypogonadism in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: The primary inclusion criterion was symptomatic testosterone deficiency, as confirmed by laboratory testing (morning total testosterone <12 nmol/L) on two separate occasions. The study was performed in 43 centres in Austria and a dosage of oral testosterone undecanoate of 2 x 80 mg/day was used for three months. The ADAM questionnaire, the AMS scale and the SF-36 questionnaire were administered by the patients and specific questions were asked to the prescribers. RESULTS: A total of 189 patient report forms and 185 doctor report forms were completed. The average age of the participants was 54.7 +/- 12.3 years and average treatment duration was 13.9 +/- 2.2 weeks. Serum testosterone level increased by more than 50% from 8.7 +/- 4.3 nmol/L to 13.2 +/- 6.7 nmol/L (p < 0.001). Treatment improved symptoms on the ADAM and AMS scales, whereas no changes were observed on the SF-36. There were no significant effects on serum PSA levels. CONCLUSION: Short-term treatment with oral testosterone undecanoate in a clinical practice setting improved late-onset hypogonadism symptoms in aging men with low testosterone levels.

Comparative trial of treatment satisfaction, efficacy and tolerability of sildenafil versus apomorphine in erectile dysfunction--an open, randomized cross-over study with flexible dosing.

OBJECTIVE: Sildenafil and apomorphine are oral agents for the improvement of erection hardness. The aim of the study was a direct comparison of the two compounds under clinical routine conditions. METHODS: 131 previously untreated men with erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled in a cross-over trial and randomly allocated to 50 mg sildenafil or 2 mg apomorphine. Dose-adaptation was allowed as required. RESULTS: Improvements in rigidity, the capacity to get and maintain an erection, and sexual confidence were statistically significantly larger with sildenafil (p <0.0001). 90% of the men were satisfied with sildenafil as compared to 46% with apomorphine. At study end, 95% of the patients preferred sildenafil. Both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-over comparison under clinical routine conditions men reported superior efficacy of sildenafil vs apomorphine together with a statistically significantly higher treatment satisfaction.

The influence of age on treatment outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction treated with two regimens of tadalafil: results of the SURE study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patterns of sexual activity and efficacy over time to two dosing regimens of tadalafil differ with ageing in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SURE study was a multicentre, crossover, open-label study. In all, 4262 men with ED were randomly assigned to treatment with tadalafil 20 mg on-demand before sexual activity, or three times per week for 5-6 weeks. After a 1-week washout period, patients were crossed over to the alternative regimen for 5-6 weeks. This post hoc analysis evaluated the pattern of sexual attempts, efficacy and safety of these two regimens of tadalafil across several age groups. RESULTS: The mean number of sexual attempts per week decreased from a range of 2.6-2.8 at age < or = 40 years to 1.9 at age >70 years. Age did not significantly influence the time of sexual activity after dosing. A high percentage of attempts occurred >4 h after dosing for all age groups ( approximately 70% for men taking tadalafil three times per week and approximately 50% for men taking tadalafil on-demand). For all age groups, most attempts took place in the late evening. The mean per-patient rate of successful attempts was similar for each interval up to 36 h after dosing and decreased with increasing age (> or =75% at age < or = 60 years, > or = 68% at age >60 to < or = 70 years, and > or = 60% at age >70 years). Tadalafil was well tolerated at all ages. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of sexual activity with tadalafil 20 mg, taken on-demand or three times per week, were similar in the different age groups. Tadalafil was effective up to 36 h after dosing for all age groups.

Evaluation of transition zone and lateral sextant biopsies for prostate cancer detection after initial sextant biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of transition zone and lateral sextant biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer after a previous sextant biopsy was negative. METHODS: A total of 74 prostates after radical prostatectomy were used to perform biopsies ex vivo. First, a sextant biopsy was taken, then two different rebiopsy techniques were performed. Rebiopsy technique A consisted of a laterally placed sextant biopsy and two cores per side of the transition zones only. Rebiopsy technique B included a standard sextant biopsy and two cores per side from the lateral areas of the prostate. The biopsies were taken using ultrasound guidance to sample the areas of interest precisely. RESULTS: The initial sextant biopsy found 39 prostate cancers. Rebiopsy technique A found 12 cancers (34%). In this group, a laterally placed sextant biopsy found 12 cancers; transition zone biopsies revealed cancer in 5 cases, but no additional tumor was found. Rebiopsy technique B detected 23 prostate cancers (66%). Fourteen tumors were found after a second standard sextant biopsy, and nine additional tumors were found in the lateral areas. CONCLUSIONS: Sextant biopsy has a low sensitivity of only 53%. A biopsy including the transition zones is not the ideal technique for detecting the remaining tumors. Therefore, transition zone biopsies should be reserved for patients with multiple previous negative biopsies of the peripheral zone. A subsequent sextant biopsy with additional cores from the lateral areas of the prostate is favorable if rebiopsy is necessary after a negative sextant biopsy.