Panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with macular edema.

PURPOSE: To investigate intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as an adjunctive therapy to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with both high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and clinically significant macular edema (CSME). METHODS: Thirty-five eyes diagnosed with both high-risk PDR and CSME underwent PRP and a single injection of 4 mg of IVTA (IVTA group). Visual, anatomic, and fluorescein angiographic changes were documented. Any complications resulting from the combined procedure were noted. These data were compared retrospectively to 35 eyes that underwent grid laser treatment to the macula followed 2 weeks later by PRP (laser group). Main outcome measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity, improvement in macular edema (clinical or angiographic), and control of the neovascular disease. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 9.6 months for the IVTA group and 11.9 months for the laser group. Mean pretreatment best-corrected visual acuity was 20/286 in the IVTA group and 20/282 in the laser group (P = 0.80). After 9 months of follow-up, visual acuity was 20/80 in the IVTA group versus 20/156 in the laser group (P = 0.007). Thirty-four percent of eyes in the IVTA group had final vision of 20/40 or better versus 11% in the laser group (P = 0.044). At 9 months follow-up, 84% of IVTA eyes had complete resolution of macular edema versus 46% of laser eyes (P = 0.002). Three eyes in the IVTA group had recurrence of macular edema after 6 months and required reinjection of IVTA. Elevation in intraocular pressure occurred in eight eyes in the IVTA group and responded to topical therapy. Cataract progression was observed in nine eyes in the IVTA group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide to PRP in the management of patients with both PDR and CSME seems promising. Further study is needed to assess the effect of this combined treatment.

Intravitreal triamcinolone for the management of macular edema due to nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in the management of persistent macular edema secondary to nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients were selected with a 3- to 4-month history of nonischemic CRVO and persistent macular edema. These patients received a single intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL). The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 12 months. The amount of macular edema was assessed by the amount of retinal thickening on clinical examination using the Goldmann contact lens and by the area and intensity of staining on fluorescein angiography. Treated patients were compared with a retrospectively matched group of patients who were managed with observation only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in visual acuity and amount of macular edema were assessed in the treated patients and compared with the observation group. RESULTS: The mean baseline visual acuity in the treatment group was 20/132 vs 20/123 for the observation group (P =.57). After 1 week, the treated group had a mean visual acuity of 20/51. At final follow-up, the treated group had a mean visual acuity of 20/37 while the observation group had a mean visual acuity of 20/110 (P =.001). Sixty percent of treated patients had a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better vs only 20% in the observation group (P =.01). Forty percent of the untreated patients had a final visual acuity worse than 20/200 while none of the treated patients did (P<.001). At final follow-up, 75% of treated patients had complete resolution of macular edema on clinical examination vs only 20% of the untreated patients (P<.001). Two of the treated patients had recurrence of macular edema at 6 months, and 3 had elevated intraocular pressure. CONCLUSION: This study shows a treatment benefit from intravitreal triamcinolone in terms of visual acuity and macular edema for nonischemic CRVO.

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the management of diabetic papillopathy.

PURPOSE: To present a case of severe drop in vision in both eyes caused by diabetic papillopathy that was treated with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. DESIGN: Interventional case report. METHODS: A diabetic patient with bilateral diabetic papillopathy and drop in vision received sequential intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections to both eyes. RESULTS: Within 2 weeks of intravitreal injection, vision improved from counting fingers at 1 m to 20/50 OS, and from counting fingers at 4 m to 20/40 OD. This improvement was accompanied by resolution of disk swelling and macular edema. Vision remained stable in both eyes at 20/40 for 8 months of follow-up. No elevation of intraocular pressure beyond 21 mm Hg was noted at any time. CONCLUSION: Diabetic papillopathy with severe drop in vision can be treated with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection.

Intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator in the management of central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in the management of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in patients with symptoms for <3 days. METHODS: We evaluated the visual outcome of a consecutive series of patients with CRVO following intravitreal tPA injection. All patients presented with visual acuity worse than 20/50 within 3 days from the onset of symptoms. Main outcome measures included percentage of patients whose final vision improved to 20/50 or better and change in percentage of patients with vision of 20/200 or worse before and after treatment. RESULTS: Twelve patients received intravitreal tPA for CRVO. Nine patients (75%) had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse at presentation compared with 4 patients (33%) at the last follow-up after treatment. Five (55%) of these 9 patients had final visual acuity that improved to 20/50 or better. The remaining four patients did not have improvement or their vision continued to worsen. All 4 patients had fluorescein angiographic evidence of >10 disk areas of capillary nonperfusion at presentation. Overall, 8 (67%) of 12 patients had final visual acuity of 20/50 or better. No side effects related to tPA injection were observed. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that intravitreal tPA injection may have a beneficial role in the management of CRVO when used within a few days of the onset of symptoms in patients with no angiographic evidence of severe capillary nonperfusion even if initial visual acuity is 20/200 or worse.