Assessment of a Prototype Apache Flight Eyewear.

BACKGROUND: Apache pilots needing refractive correction are issued modified HGU-4/P aviator spectacles. However, a recently published survey found field of view (FOV) dissatisfaction with the current spectacles when sighting in with a Helmet Display Unit (HDU). A current Air Force flight frame was modified in-lab and the purpose of this study was to evaluate the FOV with the current Apache flight frame vs. the modified flight frame. METHODS: Recruited were 21 Apache pilots to assess FOV under three conditions: 1) wearing the current Apache frame; 2) wearing the modified Apache frame; and 3) wearing no frame. The main outcome measure was total FOV of four quadrants tested: superior left (45°); superior right (135°); inferior right (225°); and inferior left (315°). RESULTS: No significant differences in FOV were seen between the two frames tested while wearing the current Apache helmet (P = 0.33) and the new Apache helmet (P = 0.64). However, there were significant differences in FOV between the no frame condition and the two frame conditions tested with both helmets (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: No significant differences in FOV were seen between the two frames tested while wearing either Apache helmet. However, with both helmets there were significant differences in FOV between the no frame condition and the two frame conditions tested. This suggests that wearing no eyewear is still optimal in integrating the HDU device. With advances in contact lens technology, future research can study the viability of the latest generation of multifocal contact lenses with Apache aviators. Walsh DV, Jurek GM, McLean WE, Statz JK, Allen RL, Riggs DW. Assessment of a prototype Apache flight eyewear. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016; 87(9):800-805.

A Performance Comparison of Color Vision Tests for Military Screening.

BACKGROUND: Current color vision (CV) tests used for aviation screening in the U.S. Army only provide pass-fail results, and previous studies have shown variable sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate seven CV tests to determine an optimal CV test screener that potentially could be implemented by the U.S. Army. METHODS: There were 133 subjects [65 Color Vision Deficits (CVD), 68 Color Vision Normal (CVN)] who performed all of the tests in one setting. CVD and CVN determination was initially assessed with the Oculus anomaloscope. Each test was administered monocularly and according to the test protocol. The main outcome measures were test sensitivity, specificity, and administration time (automated tests). RESULTS: Three of the four Pseudoisochromatic Plate (PIP) tests had a sensitivity/specificity > 0.90 OD/OS, whereas the FALANT tests had a sensitivity/specificity > 0.80 OD/OS. The Cone Contrast Test (CCT) demonstrated sensitivity/specificity > 0.90 OD/OS, whereas the Color Assessment and Diagnosis (CAD) test demonstrated sensitivity/specificity > 0.85 OD/OS. Comparison with the anomaloscope ("gold standard") revealed no significant difference of sensitivity and specificity OD/OS with the CCT, Dvorine PIP, and PIPC tests. Finally, the CCT administration time was significantly faster than the CAD test. DISCUSSION: The current U.S. Army CV screening tests demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, as did the automated tests. In addition, some current PIP tests (Dvorine, PIPC), and the CCT performed no worse statistically than the anomaloscope with regard to sensitivity/specificity. The CCT letter presentation is randomized and results would not be confounded by potential memorization, or fading, of book plates.

Assessment of an Alternative Army Aircrew Eyewear.

BACKGROUND: Currently, Army aircrews needing refractive correction are issued the HGU-4/P aviator spectacles. However, a recently published survey found dissatisfaction with the current spectacle frame. The Aircrew Flight Frame (AFF) has been used by the Air Force for over 14 yr, with the AFF-OP (Operational) style used the longest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate AFF-OP performance and compatibility among U.S. Army aircrew under operational conditions. METHODS: At 1-, 6-, and 12-wk intervals, 73 Army aircrew members wore the AFF-OP eyewear and completed a Likert scale survey. There were 14 outcome measures surveyed, with the main outcome measure being frame preference. RESULTS: The AFF-OP was preferred significantly more than the HGU-4/P spectacle. Overall, 94% of aircrew responses preferred the AFF-OP and the three highest subjective reasons for AFF-OP preference were: 1) comfort around the ears without helmet or headset; 2) comfort around the ears with helmet or headset; and 3) the effect on ear cup seal. There were no statistically significant differences in responses over the three surveyed time intervals. DISCUSSION: Army aviation aircrew preferred the AFF-OP over the current HGU-4/P spectacles. Two of the top three highest subjective reasons for AFF-OP preference coincided with two of the top three operational eyewear problems reported in the recently published survey. If Army aircrew do not wear their issued eyewear, they may purchase their own frame "out of pocket." However, this can lead to use of a frame that has not been tested for compatibility and may compromise performance of aircrew life support equipment.

Effects of repetitive low-level blast exposure on visual system and ocular structures.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine whether repetitive exposure to low-level blasts during military breacher training produces acute and cumulative damage to the ocular tissues or visual system. The effects of low-level blast exposure on high-contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, oculomotor function, color vision, visual field (VF), pupillary light reflex, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), macular thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and cup-to-disc ratio were assessed using a battery of standard clinical ophthalmic tests administered 10 times over a 2-year period. Data from nine breacher instructors (Cadre) were compared with data from four breacher engineers (CONTROL). The Cadre group showed higher vertical deviation at near than the CONTROL group over time. The VF mean deviation on the left eye that tended to be worse in the Cadre group was worse throughout the study, suggesting a decrease in VF sensitivity (Cadre: -0.20 +/- 0.15 dB; CONTROL: 1.05 +/- 0.15 dB; p = 0.03). The Cadre group had a reduced ECD (right eye: Cadre 2,502 cells/mm(2) vs CONTROL 2,808 cells/mm(2), p = 0.05; left eye: Cadre 2,558 cells/mm(2) vs CONTROL 2,892 cells/mm(2), p = 0.04). These results suggest that even low-level primary blast has the potential to produce occult eye injury.