Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 5(3): 163-167, 1999 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11810509

RESUMO

Because of controversial data on virulence and mortality, six cases of fungemia caused by Candida glabrata were reviewed in a single cancer institution within 8 years. Risk factors and outcome of C. glabrata, Candida albicans, and other non-albicans Candida spp. appearing within the same period under the same antibiotic policy at the same institution were compared. Among other non-albicans Candida spp. in 1990-1997 C. glabrata fungemias showed a decreasing tendency, from 9% to 4.5% in 1997. Analyzing the proportion of C. glabrata among blood cultures, among 170 positive blood cultures 12 were caused by C. glabrata (6.2% among all pathogens and 24% among non-albicans Candida spp.). C. glabrata among all fungemias was diagnosed as the fourth most common pathogen after C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis. Three of six C. glabrata fungemias were breakthrough. Two appeared during prophylaxis with itraconazole and one during fluconazole prophylaxis. Five of six received broadspectrum antibiotic therapy with third-generation cephalosporines, five of six had vascular catheter insertion, four of six were neutropenic, and two of six received amphotericin B therapy. One patient died before his blood cultures were reported to be positive. Overall mortality of C. glabrata fungemia was 16.7%. One patient died of underlying disease with fungemia. There were no significant differences in risk factors between C. glabrata and C. albicans. However, overall and crude mortality was lower in C. glabrata than in C. albicans (25.5% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.03). Attributable mortality was lower in comparison to C. albicans (0 vs. 15.7% in C. albicans; P = 0.001).

3.
J Infect Chemother ; 5(3): 180-184, 1999 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11810513

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to assess whether multiresistant gram-negative bacteremias (MRGNB) were associated with specific risk factors for higher mortality than sensitive gram-negative bacteremias. Two groups of subjects: (51 cases and 102 controls) were matched for sex, age, underlying disease, and neutropenia. There were no significant differences in the incidence of cytotoxic chemotherapy administered, vascular catheter insertion, catheter as source of bacteremia, and etiology of bacteremia. The proportion of Klebsiella-Enterobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was similar in the two groups. Prior surgery (21.6% vs 7.9%, P < 0.05) was significantly associated with sensitive gram-negative bacteremia. Previous prophylaxis with ofloxacin (45.1% vs 24.5%; P < 0.05) and prior therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics (41.2% vs 27.5%; P < 0.05), such as first and second generation cephalosporins (19.6% vs 7.8%; P < 0.05), third generation cephalosporins (41.2% vs 13.7%; P < 0.01), aminoglycosides (39.2% vs 9.8%; P < 0.01), ofloxacin (11.8% vs 2.0%; P < 0.005), and imipenem (19.6% vs 2.0%; P < 0.001) were significantly more frequently observed among cases than controls. Cases (patients with bacteremia due to multiresistant gram-negative bacteremias) were also significantly more frequently infected with bacteria resistant to ceftazidime (68.6% vs 17.6%; P < 0.001), amikacin (52.9% vs 7.8%; P < 0.001), imipenem (50.1% vs 23.5%; P < 0.05), ciprofloxacin (32.1% vs 5.9%; P < 0.001), and piperacillin (41.2% vs 7.8%; P < 0.01). With regard to outcome, attributable mortality was similar (15.7% vs 13.8%; not significant) in the two groups; however, cure rates were lower among cases (patients infected with MRGNB) because crude mortality was higher in cases (35.3% vs 13.8%; P < 0.01) than in controls.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...