Intra-articular Injections of the Hip and Knee With Triamcinolone vs Ketorolac: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians commonly utilize intra-articular injections to treat symptomatic primary arthritis. Steroid injections are common yet have immune-modulating effects and can alter gene expression which may delay definitive arthroplasty and further damage cartilage. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory injections may offer a safer profile due to their differing mechanism of action; however, there is a relative dearth of information regarding their efficacy. This noninferiority study compares the effectiveness of triamcinolone vs ketorolac in treating symptoms of moderate to advanced primary osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. METHODS: In total, 110 patients (52 hips and 58 knees) with moderate to severe radiographic primary osteoarthritis of the hip or knee were randomized in a double-blinded study to receive an ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of ketorolac or triamcinolone. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected pre-injection and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. RESULTS: For hips and knees, intra-articular injections with either ketorolac or triamcinolone led to statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures. The treatment effect size was largest at 1 week and decreased over time. Primary analysis of variance comparisons revealed no significant differences between ketorolac and triamcinolone. For knee injections, post hoc secondary analysis suggests slight added durability in the triamcinolone group. Adverse effects were minimal with both interventions. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular ketorolac injections provide comparable improvement to triamcinolone for primary hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ketorolac is an additional low-cost option for conservative management of primary osteoarthritis, and due to its differing mechanism of action, it may not propagate additional cartilage damage or preclude from early surgical intervention if unsuccessful. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04441112.

Two Different Knee Rotational Instabilities Occur With Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Injuries: A Robotic Study on Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Extra-articular Reconstructions in Restoring Rotational Stability.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of 2 extra-articular reconstructions on pivot-shift rotational stability and tibial internal rotation as a basis for clinical recommendations. METHODS: A robotic simulator tested 15 cadaver knees. Group 1 (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] cut) underwent ACL bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstruction followed by sectioning the anterolateral structures and an extra-articular, manual-tension iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis. Group 2 (ACL intact) tested the rotational stabilizing effect of a low-tension ITB tenodesis before and after sectioning the anterolateral ligament/ITB structures. Lateral and medial tibiofemoral compartment translations and internal-external tibial rotations were measured under Lachman, 5N·m tibial rotation, and 2 pivot-shift simulations using 4-degree-of-freedom loading. Statistical equivalence was defined within 2 mm tibiofemoral compartment translation and 2° tibial rotation at P < .05. RESULTS: The bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction (group 1) restored pivot-shift lateral compartment translation within 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.6 to 1.9; P = .70) of normal. The internal rotation limit was not affected by ACL sectioning or reconstruction. After anterolateral ligament/ITB sectioning there was no change in pivot-shift lateral compartment translation, however internal rotation increased 2.9° (95% CI, 0.6-5.2; P = .99) at 90° flexion. The manual-tension ITB tenodesis (fixated 13-22 N tension) decreased pivot-shift lateral compartment translation 4.8 mm (95% CI, 1.4-8.1; P = .99) and internal rotation by 21.9° (95% CI, 13.2-30.6; P = .99) at 90° flexion. The ACL forces decreased 45.8% in the pivot-shift test. In group 2 knees, with the ACL intact, the anterolateral ligament/ITB sectioning had no effect on pivot-shift translations; however, the internal rotation limit increased by 4.3° (95% CI, 1.9-6.8; P = .99) at 60° flexion. The low-tension ITB tenodesis (fixated 8.9 N tension) had no effect on pivot-shift translations and corrected internal tibial rotation with a mild overconstraint of 4.2° (95% CI, 1.9-6.8; P = .99) at 60° flexion. CONCLUSIONS: A low-tension ITB tenodesis, fixated at neutral tibial rotation to avoid constraining internal tibial rotation, has no effect in limiting abnormal pivot-shift subluxations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A low-tension ITB tenodesis has limited clinical utilization as the pivot-shift subluxations are not affected, assuming appropriate tensioning to not overconstrain internal tibial rotation.

Is an Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Required in ACL-Reconstructed Knees With Associated Injury to the Anterolateral Structures? A Robotic Analysis of Rotational Knee Stability.

BACKGROUND: The effect of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction on rotational knee stability and corresponding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft forces using multiple knee loading conditions including the pivot-shift phenomenon has not been determined. PURPOSE: First, to determine the rotational stability and ACL graft forces provided by an anatomic bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction in the ACL-deficient knee alone and with an associated ALL/iliotibial band (ITB) injury. Second, to determine the added rotational stabilizing effect and reduction in ACL graft forces provided by an ALL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator was used to test 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens during 5 testing conditions: intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed, ALL/ITB-sectioned, and ALL-reconstructed. Lateral and medial tibiofemoral compartment translations and internal tibial rotations were measured under Lachman test conditions, 5-N·m internal rotation, and 2 pivot-shift simulations. Statistical equivalence within 2 mm and 2° was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Single-graft ACL reconstruction restored central tibial translation under Lachman testing and internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque ( P < .05). A modest increase in internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque occurred after ALL/ITB sectioning of 5.1° (95% CI, 3.6° to 6.7°) and 6.7° (95% CI, 4.3° to 9.1°) at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively ( P = .99). Lateral compartment translation increases in the pivot-shift tests were <2 mm. ALL reconstruction restored internal rotation within 0.5° (95% CI, -1.9° to 2.9°) and 0.7° (95% CI, -2.0° to 3.4°) of the ACL-reconstructed state at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively ( P < .05). The ALL procedure reduced ACL graft forces, at most, 75 N in the pivot-shift tests and 81 N in the internal rotation tests. CONCLUSION: Although the ALL reconstruction corrected the small abnormal changes in the internal rotation limit at high flexion angles, the procedure had no effect in limiting tibiofemoral compartment translations in the pivot-shift test and produced only modest decreases in ACL graft forces. Accordingly, the recommendation to perform an ALL reconstruction to correct pivot-shift abnormalities is questioned. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The small changes in rotational stability after ALL/ITB sectioning would not seem to warrant the routine addition of an ALL reconstruction in primary ACL injuries. Clinical exceptions may exist, as in grossly unstable grade 3 pivot-shift knees and revision knees. However, the concern exists of overconstraining normal tibial rotations.

Anterolateral Ligament and Iliotibial Band Control of Rotational Stability in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Intact Knee: Defined by Tibiofemoral Compartment Translations and Rotations.

PURPOSE: To determine the stabilizing effect of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and iliotibial band (ITB) in resisting internal tibial rotation limits and anterior subluxations of the tibiofemoral compartments in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-intact knees during anterior drawer, internal rotation, and under 2 different 4-degree-of-freedom pivot-shift conditions. METHODS: A 6-degree-of-freedom robotic simulator tested 19 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens with 3 testing conditions: intact, ALL- or ITB-sectioned (random), and both ALL and ITB sectioned. Anterior translation of the medial and lateral compartments and internal tibial rotation were measured under 100 N anterior drawer, 5 Nm internal rotation, and 2 pivot-shift conditions. Statistical equivalence was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Sectioning the ALL alone had no effect on lateral compartment translation or internal rotation under any loading condition (equivalent P < .05). After ITB sectioning alone, small increases in internal rotation were found under 5 Nm internal rotation at 60° (3.0° [90% confidence interval 1.9-4.1]; P = .99) and 90° (2.2° [90% confidence interval 1.5-2.9]; P = .84) flexion. After both ALL and ITB were sectioned, increases in internal rotation of 1.7°, 4.5°, and 3.9° occurred at 25°, 60°, and 90° flexion, respectively (P > .05). Small increases in pivot-shift internal rotation (Group 1: 2.0° [90% confidence interval 1.4-2.6]; P = .52) and lateral compartment translation occurred (Group 1: 0.9 mm [90% confidence interval 0.7-1.1]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Sectioning the ALL does not lead to an increase in tibiofemoral compartment subluxations in the pivot-shift test with an intact ACL. Accordingly the ALL would not represent a primary restraint to pivot-shift subluxations. ALL sectioning alone does not lead to an increase in internal rotation motion limits, however sectioning both the ALL and ITB did produce small increases in rotation limits at higher flexion angles which would likely not be clinically detectable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A deficiency to both the ALL and ITB during in vitro-simulated pivot-shift tests and internal rotation tests results in small, clinically undetectable changes in knee kinematics in the majority of knees assuming intact ACL function.

Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

OBJECTIVES: The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. METHODS: Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. RESULTS: Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.

Variability in tissue bank practices regarding donor and tissue screening of structural allograft bone.

STUDY DESIGN: A standardized questionnaire was directed to medical directors of US structural allograft bone providers regarding their practices in screening potential donors and allograft bone itself for parameters potentially affecting mechanical strength. OBJECTIVE: To determine the uniformity of practices within the US allograft bone industry regarding parameters related to structural allograft bone mechanical strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite oversight with respect to disease transmission and contamination, few guidelines exist regarding donor eligibility and bone itself for issues potentially affecting the mechanical integrity of structural allograft bone. METHODS: A survey regarding donor and tissue screening practices impacting mechanical strength of structural allograft bone was administered to medical directors of American Association of Tissue Banks-accredited structural allograft bone providers. Results are reported as the percentage of all tissue banks using a given donor or tissue screening method and the percentage of the total US supply of structural allograft bone affected. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent (14 of 16) of bone-processing banks completed the survey, accounting for 98% of the US supply of structural allograft bone. Approximately 76% (18,712 of 24,671) of all tissue donors are used as a source of structural bone allograft. Thirty-nine percent (6 of 14) of tissue banks have no upper age limit or accept structural allograft bone donors up to age 80. Fifty percent (7 of 14) of banks exclude donors with a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Sixty-four percent (9 of 14) of banks require a minimum cortical dimension of structural bone allograft, representing 81% (15,110 of 18,712) of the US supply. No tissue bank performs dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans of potential bone donors. CONCLUSION: Substantial variability exists in screening practices of US tissue banks regarding mechanical strength of structural allograft bone. Reported variations may reflect the lack of regulatory standards regarding these issues. Further data regarding these variables' impacts on allograft strength and clinical outcomes would be helpful in developing appropriate standards.

Acute celiac artery compression syndrome after surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A case of acute celiac artery compression syndrome after spinal fusion in a patient with Scheuermann kyphosis is reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe the unusual complication of acute celiac artery compression after surgical kyphosis correction, to outline diagnostic methods, and to review the pertinent literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic celiac artery compression syndrome is well described, yet there is only 1 reported case of acute celiac artery compression after surgical correction of kyphosis. There have been no previous reports of this complication leading to foregut ischemic necrosis after correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: After an anterior release and posterior spinal fusion for a 106 degrees kyphotic deformity performed under 1 anesthetic, our patient developed a perforated gastric antrum on postoperative day 5, evolving to ischemic necrosis of the stomach, gallbladder, and spleen discovered on postoperative day 7. Abdominal angiography indicated that his celiac artery had been occluded at its origin. After this event, the patient required a prolonged intensive care hospital stay and required a Roux-en-Y gastro-jejeunostomy reconstruction. He is now doing well at 1-year follow-up with independent ambulation and a regular diet. CONCLUSION: Acute celiac artery compression after surgical kyphosis correction is a rare but potentially serious adverse event. Spinal deformity surgeons and intensivists should be aware of this entity, and should have a high index of suspicion for it if sepsis of unknown origin, an acute abdomen, or elevated liver enzymes are encountered after surgery after correction of a kyphotic deformity.