Difficult healthcare transitions: Ethical analysis and policy recommendations for unrepresented patients.

BACKGROUND: In Ontario, Canada, patients who lack decision-making capacity and have no family or friends to act as substitute decision-makers currently rely on the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee to consent to long-term care (nursing home) placement, but they have no legal representative for other placement decisions. OBJECTIVES: We highlight the current gap in legislation for difficult transition cases involving unrepresented patients and provide a novel framework for who ought to assist with making these decisions and how these decisions ought to be made. RESEARCH DESIGN: This paper considers models advanced by Volpe and Steinman with regard to who ought to make placement decisions for unrepresented patients, as well as current ethical models for analyzing how these decisions should be made. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: We describe an anonymized healthcare transition case to illustrate the fact that there is no legally recognized decision-maker for placement destinations other than long-term care facilities and to show how this impacts all stakeholders. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The case provided is an anonymized vignette representing a typical transition case involving an unrepresented patient. FINDINGS: As a result of a gap in provincial legislation, healthcare providers usually determine the appropriate placement destination without a clear framework to guide the process and this can cause significant moral distress. DISCUSSION: We argue for a team decision-making approach in the short term, and a legislative change in the long-term, to respect the patient voice, evaluate benefit and risk, enhance collaboration between healthcare providers and patients, and promote social justice. We believe that our approach, which draws upon the strengths of interprofessional teams, will be of interest to all who are concerned with the welfare and ethical treatment of the patients for whom they care. CONCLUSIONS: One of the main strengths of our recommendation is that it provides all members of the healthcare team (including nurses, social workers, therapists, and others) an increased opportunity to advocate on behalf of unrepresented patients.

The Eagles Eye Mobile: assessing its ability to deliver eye care in a high-risk community.

PURPOSE: The Philadelphia Eagle Eye Mobile (EEM) provides optometric vision care to children who fail a vision screening performed by nurses at schools in low-income areas. METHODS: Data for children seen on the EEM between 2006 and 2008 for whom school nurse feedback was available regarding glasses wear at 1-, 4-, and 12-month intervals served as the study population. Optometric findings and glasses prescriptions at initial examination were recorded in the EEM database. The ophthalmic records for children referred for pediatric ophthalmology consultation at our institution were reviewed and those who did not attend were counted. RESULTS: A random subset of 689 students at 28 different schools at which follow-up forms were distributed to the school nurses regarding glasses wear was studied. This represents 10.8% of 6,365 children screened at 131 public schools visited by the EEM during that period. False-positive rates of school nurse screening averaged 16.11% (0% to 44%) for 689 children from 28 schools. Glasses compliance was 71% at 12 months and correlated to higher prescriptions. Only 53% of children attended their pediatric ophthalmology referral. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse training to reduce false-positive screening and strategies to improve attendance at arranged pediatric ophthalmologist consultations are recommended. The EEM effectively gets glasses to students where needed and use rates are satisfactory.