A tale of two diseases: the history of inflammatory bowel disease.

'Inflammatory bowel disease' (IBD) sounds like a straightforward term - a disease of inflammation in the bowel. However, the history of IBD reveals a story of a nefariously complex set of idiopathic conditions. IBD defies definition, in part because its pathophysiology is not completely understood. For the same reason and despite substantial advances in research, IBD also defies cure. At best, IBD can be defined as a disease of disruption - disrupted physiology, microbiology, immunology and genetics. The term 'IBD' is most often used to describe two separate conditions: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). This paper reviews the history of IBD, considering the ever-evolving understanding of both UC and CD. Beyond its intrinsic interest, the history of IBD exemplifies a pattern that is becoming increasingly familiar in the 21st century - the story of a chronic, incurable disease that defies the best efforts to treat it.

Clinical features distinguish eosinophilic and reflux-induced esophagitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diagnosing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) depends on intraepithelial eosinophil count of ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF); however, differentiating EoE from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be a challenge because no true "criterion standard" criteria exist. Identifying clinical and endoscopic characteristics that distinguish EoE could provide a more comprehensive diagnostic strategy than the present criteria. The aim of the study was to determine symptoms and signs that can be used to distinguish EoE from reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Adult and pediatric patients with EoE were identified by present diagnostic guidelines including an esophageal biopsy finding of ≥15 eosinophils/HPF. Patients with GERD were age-matched one to one with patients with EoE. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic information at the time of diagnosis was obtained from the medical record and compared between pairs by McNemar test. A conditional logistic regression model was created using 6 distinguishing disease characteristics. This model was used to create a nomogram to differentiate EoE from reflux-induced esophagitis. RESULTS: Patients with EoE were 75% men and 68% had a history of atopy. Many aspects of EoE were statistically distinct from GERD when controlling for age. Male sex, dysphagia, history of food impaction, absence of pain/heartburn, linear furrowing, and white papules were the distinguishing variables used to create the logistic regression model and scoring system based on odds ratios. The area under the curve of the receiver-operator characteristic curve for this model was 0.858. CONCLUSIONS: EoE can be distinguished from GERD using a scoring system of clinical and endoscopic features. Prospective studies will be needed to validate this model.

Atopic and non-atopic eosinophilic oesophagitis are distinguished by immunoglobulin E-bearing intraepithelial mast cells.

AIMS: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) occurs in atopic individuals and features eosinophils and mast cells, but differences in the inflammatory cell density between the epithelium and lamina propria (LP) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine if numbers of eosinophils, B lymphocytes and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-bearing mast cells are increased in the mucosa of EoE patients with and without concurrent atopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Oesophageal biopsies containing ≥ 4 high-power fields (HPF) of epithelium and LP were identified for normal (n = 9), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (n = 5) and EoE (n = 25) patients. Patients were classified as atopic or not by clinical history. Immunohistochemistry identified mast cells, B lymphocytes and eosinophils. Eosinophil density was increased in the LP in EoE. Intraepithelial eosinophil density correlated with eosinophils/HPF, CD20(+) B lymphocyte density and tryptase(+) IgE(+) mast cell density. Increased intraepithelial IgE(+) cell density in EoE was associated with mast cells and not B lymphocytes. Intraepithelial IgE(+) mast cell densities were significantly higher in biopsies from the subgroup of EoE patients with atopy. CONCLUSIONS: EoE diagnosis using maximal eosinophil count/HPF correlates with average counts/mm(2), and intraepithelial eosinophil densities are higher in children than adults with EoE. In EoE, numbers of eosinophils and mast cells are increased in the LP. IgE-bearing mast cells are increased in atopic EoE patients but not in non-atopic EoE patients.

Expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 3 on esophageal epithelial cell lines and on eosinophils during esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: The chronic disease eosinophilic esophagitis may be mediated by the innate immune system. Activation of toll-like receptors (TLRs) in other tissues is known to initiate eosinophil infiltration, thus TLRs may be a potential mediator of esophageal eosinophilia. Little is known about TLRs in the esophagus. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to identify the presence and activation of TLR2 and TLR3 on esophageal epithelial cell lines, primary epithelial cells and mucosal esophageal biopsies. METHODS: TLR2 and TLR3 were identified by immunocytochemistry and immunoblot. PCR assessed alterations to gene expression by activation of TLR2 and TLR3. Immunohistochemistry co-localized eosinophils and TLR2/TLR3 on esophageal biopsies. RESULTS: TLR2 and TLR3 were expressed on the esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines TE-1 and TE-7, but only TLR3 was present on the esophageal epithelial cell line HET-1A. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin gene expression was altered in response to ligands zymosan and polyI:C, demonstrating activation. Primary esophageal epithelial cells did not express TLR2 or TLR3. In esophageal biopsies, TLR2 and TLR3 expression was limited to eosinophils and other immune cells during esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS: TLR2 and TLR3 expression on cultured esophageal epithelial cells differs from TLR2 and TLR3 expression in esophageal biopsies, which is limited to immune cells during esophagitis.

Antigen presentation and MHC class II expression by human esophageal epithelial cells: role in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) play a crucial role in initiating immune responses. Under pathological conditions, epithelial cells at mucosal surfaces act as nonprofessional APCs, thereby regulating immune responses at the site of exposure. Epithelial cells in the esophagus may contribute to the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) by presenting antigens on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II. Our goal was to demonstrate the ability of esophageal epithelial cells to process and present antigens on the MHC class II system and to investigate the contribution of epithelial cell antigen presentation to EoE. Immunohistochemistry detected HLA-DR, CD80, and CD86 expression and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detected interferon-γ (IFNγ) in esophageal biopsies. Antigen presentation was studied using the human esophageal epithelial cell line HET-1A by reverse transcriptase-PCR, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy. T helper cell lymphocyte proliferation was assessed by flow cytometry and IL-2 secretion. IFNγ and MHC class II were increased in mucosa of patients with EoE. IFNγ increased mRNA of HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, HLA-DR, and CIITA in HET-1A cells. HET-1A engulfed cell debris and processed ovalbumin. HET-1A cells expressed HLA-DR after IFNγ treatment. HET-1A stimulated T helper cell activation. In this study, we demonstrated the ability of esophageal epithelial cells to act as nonprofessional APCs in the presence of IFNγ. Esophageal epithelial cell antigen presentation may contribute to the pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Recurrent abdominal pain and weight loss in an adolescent: celiac artery compression syndrome.

Celiac artery compression syndrome is a rare cause of abdominal pain and weight loss, likely caused by compression of the celiac artery or plexus by the median arcuate ligament. A case of celiac artery compression syndrome in a 17-year-old male patient with severe postprandial pain and weight loss is described. Imaging techniques such as computed tomography, angiography and Doppler ultrasound identified the abnormality, which was corrected by laparoscopic surgery.

The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) on human esophagus and evidence of expression of the CaSR on the esophageal epithelial cell line (HET-1A).

Gastrointestinal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis are characterized by basal cell hyperplasia. The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), a G protein-coupled receptor, which may be activated by divalent agonists, is expressed throughout the gastrointestinal system. The CaSR may regulate proliferation or differentiation, depending on cell type and tissue. The current experiments demonstrate the expression of the CaSR on a human esophageal epithelial cell line (HET-1A) and the location and expression of the CaSR in the human esophagus. CaSR immunoreactivity was seen in the basal layer of normal human esophagus. CaSR expression was confirmed in HET-1A cells by RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry, and Western blot analysis. CaSR stimulation by extracellular calcium or agonists, such as spermine or Mg(2+), caused ERK1 and 2 activation, intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) mobilization (as assessed by microspecfluorometry using Fluo-4), and secretion of the multifunctional cytokine IL-8 (CX-CL8). HET-1A cells transiently transfected with small interfering (si)RNA duplex against the CaSR manifested attenuated responses to Ca(2+) stimulation of phospho- (p)ERK1 and 2, [Ca(2+)](i) mobilization, and IL-8 secretion, whereas responses to acetylcholine (ACh) remained sustained. An inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) (U73122) blocked CaSR-stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) release. We conclude that the CaSR is present on basal cells of the human esophagus and is present in a functional manner on the esophageal epithelial cell line, HET-1A.