Correction and Prevention of the Pixie Ear Deformity: A Combined Technique.

Background: Ear and earlobe deformities after surgical rhytidectomy are common and can significantly diminish the aesthetic outcome. The main causes of ear/earlobe distortion are skin overresection, an imbalance between vertical/horizontal skin-lift vectors, and tractional distortions through superficial muscularaponeurotic system (SMAS) tension. Objectives: To demonstrate a new method for earlobe suturing and ear fixation that would prevent aesthetics-related complications after facelift surgery. Methods: A total of 105 primary SMAS facelift surgeries were performed between 2015 and 2016 by the first author. A combination technique consisting of a posterior earlobe rotation flap (PERF) and a concha-mastoid suspension suture (CMSS) was executed bilaterally within each facelift procedure (n = 210). A retrospective data analysis was conducted (preoperatively and one year postoperatively) using our hospital information system and a photometric data analysis to assess auricular displacement, earlobe distortion, and hypertrophic scarring. Results: Pseudoptosis of the earlobe was noted in two cases, and auricular displacement was observed in four cases. Bilateral mild hypertrophic scarring was seen in one patient. The postoperative photometric analysis showed a natural ptosis grade I/II in all the patients, with a statistically significantly reduced postoperative earlobe size (P < 0.05). The total rate of aesthetics-related complications was 4% in our cohort (earlobe distortion with pseudoptosis: 1%; auricular displacement: 2%; hypertrophic scarring: 1%). Conclusions: Our modification of the facial flap anchoring at the ear base in combination with a CMSS stabilizes the natural position of the ear and prevents distortion while allowing better control over the earlobe's aesthetic shaping. This novel method reduces the incidence of ear/earlobe deformities and hypertrophic scarring at the ear base after rhytidectomy and, therefore, promises to be a valuable advancement.

Removal of Polyacrylamide Gel (Aquamid®) from the Lip as a Solution for Late-Onset Complications: Our 8-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: The polyacrylamide hydrogel Aquamid® has been used as a permanent filler to enhance facial soft tissue volume and correct wrinkles since 2001. Various long-term studies have proved the safety of the product. Nonetheless, if complications such as migration occur, they can be difficult to treat. METHODS: Eleven patients suffering from late-onset complications after taking Aquamid® injections in the lips underwent product removal and subsequent labial reconstruction between 2009 and 2017. The reconstruction was performed using a modified bikini reduction technique combined, in eight cases, with immediate autologous fat grafting. RESULTS: In all the patients, general fibrosis and a diffused distribution of the product within all three layers of the lips resulted in the need for labial reconstruction. Migration, as far as in the mucosa and perioral skin, accounted for macroscopically visible yellowish accumulations. In ten out of eleven cases, an individually modified bikini reduction technique, with or without any combination of autologous fat grafting, led to an esthetically satisfying result. One patient developed a severe upper lip necrosis. CONCLUSION: Contradictory to several previous studies attesting to the lack of migration after Aquamid® application to the lips, capsule formation around the product is impaired, allowing for migration even years after the injection. Product aspiration is not possible in these cases, thus necessitating complex lip reconstruction. Bikini reduction and fat grafting are valuable tools for labial reconstruction. Product residuals within the mucosa have to be accepted. Special care has to be taken while treating smokers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Recurrent 8-Year Ongoing Unilateral Breast Seroma Formation after PIP Implant Removal-A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Late seroma formation is a rare complication after implant-based breast enlargement surgery and even less frequent after implant removal. This case report presents a case of painful recurrent seroma formation after the removal of a ruptured Poly Implants Prothèse implant. A 52-year-old patient presented herself in our clinic with a clinical history of recurrent unilateral seroma of the right breast over a period of 8 years after the initial unilateral implant removal. Removal of the remaining implant and complete bilateral capsulectomy was performed. Intraoperative findings revealed a macroscopically thickened capsule with signs of chronic inflammation on the affected side. The clinical history and the macroscopic appearance of the capsule demanded histopathological exclusion of a possible anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Histopathological and microbiological analysis of the capsule and encapsulated material revealed no signs of malignancy or infection. Immediate soft tissue reconstruction of the breast was successfully performed using autologous fat transfer. An aesthetically satisfying result regarding symmetry and volume was achieved, and no further seroma formation was observed within a 6-month follow-up period. Level of evidence: V, Case Report.

The liquid facelift: First hands-on experience with facial water jet-assisted liposuction as an additive technique for rhytidectomy - a case series of 25 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, water jet-assisted liposuction (WAL) was successfully applied by several other authors to remove fat and induce skin contraction in nonfacial body areas. Extending the range of indications for this new method, the authors of this article report on their first experience with its use in facial contouring, fat harvesting, and hydrodissection of the facial skin flap in rhytidectomy in a case series of 25 patients. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (median age: 56 years) had facelift surgery under sedation, and the WAL technique was used for facial contouring, fat harvesting for facial lipotransfer, and hydrodissection of the facial skin flap. Patients were monitored for discomfort during the procedure. Complications such as bleeding, postoperative swelling, and hematoma formation were observed during a 1-week follow-up period, and intensity was rated by two independent surgeons using a special grading system. Furthermore, a patient survey (FACE-Q) was performed to analyze the patients' satisfaction and perception of the postsurgical esthetic results. RESULTS: The WAL technique can be applied under intravenous sedation without causing any discomfort in all treated patients [mean 1.16, standard deviation (SD) 0.31]. Intraoperative bleeding during WAL-assisted facial dissection was judged as not present at all times (mean 1.3, SD 0.32). Postoperative swelling (day 1: mean 1.82, SD 0.28; day 7: mean 1.18, SD 0.28) and hematoma formation following surgery (day 1: mean 1.58, SD 0.34; day 7: mean 1.18, SD 0.31) were judged as minor in all cases. Overall, no skin necrosis was detected. There was no need for revision surgery. More than half of our treated patients (n = 13) answered the FACE-Q questionnaire, verifying a high satisfaction rate with beneficial treatment results without the occurrence of any major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The WAL technique seems to offer a safe and efficient treatment approach for facial contouring, facial fat harvesting, and simultaneous facial flap hydrodissection with only minor postoperative swelling and hematoma formation. Therefore, the authors believe that the WAL technique is a powerful and useful tool and should be used in modern facial plastic surgery.

A prospective clinical trial comparing Biobrane(®) Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) dressings on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites.

INTRODUCTION: In a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial three different configured wound dressings Biobrane(®), Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) were compared with each other regarding objective and subjective healing parameters and cost efficiency. METHODS: 28 burn patients received surgical treatment with split-thickness skin grafting, while utilizing Biobrane(®), Dressilk(®) and PolyMem(®) as a single bound donor site wound dressing in all patients. Following a standardized case report form, we monitored several parameters such as pain, transparency of the dressing, active bleeding, exudation and inflammation by using the Verbal Rating Scale 1-10 through out. RESULTS: With regard to re-epithelialization, pain and acute bleeding all three dressings were equivalent. Dressilk(®) and Biobrane(®) presented clearly superior to PolyMem(®) in both wound assessment and in the reduction of mild inflammation and exudation. High subjective satisfaction rates were reported with Dressilk(®) and Biobrane(®) dressings in regard to comfort and mobility. During the continuous monitoring period Biobrane(®) outperformed Dressilk(®) by providing higher wound transparency rates and offering a better level of wound control during the entire study period. Regarding their cost efficiency, PolyMem(®) and Dressilk(®) are clearly superior to Biobrane(®). CONCLUSION: The "ideal" wound dressing maximizes patients' comfort while reducing pain and the risk of pulling off migrating epidermal cells from the wound surface. In addition reliable wound status evaluation (minimizing complications), an increase of treatment cost value efficacy, and reduced hospitalization rates should be provided. Dressilk(®) and Biobrane(®) were favored by patients and surgeons for providing an effective and safe healing environment, with overall low complication rates with respect to infection and exudation. Regarding cost-effectiveness PolyMem(®) and Dressilk(®) presented superior to Biobrane(®).