Evaluation of the relationship between the stop-bang score with oxygen reserve index and difficult airway: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome have a tendency towards hypoventilation, hypoxia, and hypercarbia in the perioperative period. This study hypothesized that the Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) could predict possible hypoxia and determine difficult airways in patients at risk for OSA, as determined by the STOP-Bang questionnaire. METHODS: This prospective study included adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, divided into two groups: low risk (0-2 points) and high risk (3-8 points) based on their STOP-Bang questionnaire results. The primary outcome measure was the highest ORi value reached during preoxygenation and the time to reach this value. Data were recorded at four time points: before preoxygenation (T1), end of preoxygenation (T2), end of mask ventilation (T3), and end of intubation (T4), as well as partial oxygen pressure values in T1, T2, and T4. The secondary outcome measures were the grading scale for mask ventilation, Cormack-Lehane score, tonsil dimensions, use of a stylet, and application of the burp maneuver during intubation. RESULTS: In the high-risk group, preoperative peripheral oxygen saturation values, the highest ORi value reached in preoxygenation, and ORi values at T3 and T4 times were lower, and the time to reach the highest ORi value was longer (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Using ORi in patients with OSA may be useful in evaluating oxygenation, and since difficult airway is more common, ORi monitoring will better manage possible hypoxic conditions.

Effects of Supraglottic Airway Devices on Hemodynamic Response and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter: Proseal LMA, LMA Supreme, and I-gel LMA.

Background and Objectives: Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are known to be useful in eliminating the drawbacks of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, especially ocular pressure and stress responses. The ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) reflects increases in intracranial pressure (ICP). In our study, we aimed to compare the effects of SADs on hemodynamic response and ONSD. Materials and Methods: Our prospective study included 90 ASA I-II patients over the age of 18 who did not have a history of difficult intubation or ophthalmic pathology. The patients were randomly divided into three groups based on the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) devices used: ProSeal LMA (pLMA, n = 30), LMA Supreme (sLMA, n = 30), and I-gel (n = 30). The bilateral ONSD measurements and hemodynamic data of the patients who underwent standard anesthesia induction and monitoring were recorded before induction (T0) and 1 min (T1), 5 min (T5), and 10 min (T10) after SAD placement. Results: At all measurement times, the hemodynamic responses and ONSD values of the groups were similar. In all three groups, intergroup hemodynamic changes at T0 and T1 were similar and higher than those at other times of measurement (p < 0.001). The ONSD values of all groups increased at T1, and they tended to return to baseline values afterward (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We concluded that all three SADs could be used safely because they preserved both hemodynamic stability and ONSD changes in their placement processes, and they did not cause elevations in ONSD to an extent that would lead to increased ICP.

Investigation of preoxygenation methods in cesarean surgeries with the oxygen reserve index.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate preoxygenation methods that were carried out for 3 minutes (min) at tidal volume and 30 seconds (s) with the 4 deep vital capacity technique using the Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI) among pregnant women. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out between December 2020 and 2021. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups with the provision of preoxygenation using 100% O2 at a rate of 10 L.min-1 for 3 min at normal tidal volume (Group 1) and 30 s with the 4 deep vital capacity technique (Group 2). For the pregnant women who underwent routine anesthesia induction, hemodynamic parameters before preoxygenation, as well as their fraction of inspired O2 (FiO2), fraction of expired O2 (FeO2), and ORI values were recorded after preoxygenation and 0, 3 and 7 minutes after intubation (T1, T2, T3, and T4). RESULTS: The study was completed with 66 patients. FiO2 values were found to be low in T1 (p=0.012) in Group 1, and high in FeO2 values in T1 and T2 (p=0.025 and 0.009) in Group 2, while no significant differences were found at other times (p>0.05). Oxygen Reserve Index values did not show a significant difference in comparisons between groups, but ORI values of Group 1 after intubation were significantly lower than those measured after preoxygenation in in-group comparisons (p<0.001). According to the results of the correlation analyses between the mean ORI values and their mean FeO2 and FiO2 values, there were weak and positive statistically significant relationships at T3 and T4 (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: As we obtained greater FiO2 and FeO2 values in preoxygenation with the 30 s 4 deep vital capacity method, and because this method did not cause a significant decrease in the post-intubation ORI values, we believe that the usage of this method in cesarean section surgeries may be appropriate.

Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Predicts Adverse Events in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of death in patients with COVID-19. Autopsy findings showed that the incidence of thromboembolic events was higher than clinically suspected. In this study, the authors investigated the relationship between pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and simplified PESI (sPESI) on admission to the hospital, as well as adverse events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without clinically documented venous and/or pulmonary embolism. The adverse events investigated were the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, the need for intensive care unit admission, invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective and observational study. SETTING: Two large-volume tertiary hospitals in the same city. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 720 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a positive polymerase chain reaction were evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the study population, 48.6% (350) were women, and the median age was 66 years (19-96). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20.5%. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a significant relationship was found between the whole adverse events considered and PESI, as well as sPESI (p < 0.001). According to the results, sPESI ≥2 predicts in-hospital mortality with a sensitivity of 61.4% and specificity of 83.3% (area under the curve = 0.817, 95% confidence interval 0.787-0.845, p < 0.001). Similarly, PESI classes IV and V also were found as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality (for PESI class IV, odds ratio = 2.81, p < 0.017; for PESI class V, odds ratio = 3.94, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PESI and sPESI scoring systems were both found to be associated with adverse events, and they can be used to predict in-hospital mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without documented venous and/or pulmonary embolism.

Effects of different fresh gas flows on carboxyhemoglobin levels: non-invasive carbon monoxide monitoring: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To observe the effect of different fresh gas flows (FGF) on carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels non-invasively and continuously and to determine the contribution of the smoking status to intraoperative carbon monoxide (CO) accumulation and respiratory complications. METHODS: A total of 64 patients were included in the study. Carboxyhemoglobin level was monitored non-invasively from the fingertip. Patients were divided into 2 according to the FGF as low-flow anesthesia (LFA; Group L) and high flow anesthesia (Group H). Each group was divided again into 2 groups as smokers and non-smokers. Carboxyhemoglobin and and the respiratory complications that occurred in the post-anesthesia care unit were recorded. RESULTS: The mean COHb values were significantly higher in Group L between 30th and 210th minutes. Furthermore, in Group L, intraoperative COHb levels were significantly higher in smokers compared to non-smokers in all periods. In group H, no difference was observed between smokers and non-smokers in terms of COHb levels after 60 minutes and also preoperative COHb levels of the patients developed respiratory complication was higher. CONCLUSION: If the CO2 absorbent is properly preserved in patients who are administered LFA, there will be no risk of CO accumulation even in chronic smokers.ClinicalTrials.gov REG. No.: NCT04832256.

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation and epidural anesthesia for an emergency open cholecystectomy / Ventilação mecânica não invasiva e anestesia peridural em colecistectomia aberta de emergência

Abstract Non-invasive ventilation is an accepted treatment modality in both acute exacerbations of respiratory diseases and chronic obstructive lung disease. It is commonly utilized in the intensive care units, or for postoperative respiratory support in post-anesthesia care units. This report describes intraoperative support in non-invasive ventilation to neuroaxial anesthesia for an emergency upper abdominal surgery.

Resumo Ventilação não invasiva é uma modalidade de tratamento aceita tanto em exacerbações agudas de doenças respiratórias quanto em doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica. É comumente usada em unidades de terapia intensiva ou para suporte respiratório pós-cirúrgico em salas de recuperação pós-anestesia. Este relato descreve o suporte intraoperatório em ventilação não invasiva para bloqueio do neuroeixo em cirurgia abdominal alta de emergência.

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation and epidural anesthesia for an emergency open cholecystectomy.

Non-invasive ventilation is an accepted treatment modality in both acute exacerbations of respiratory diseases and chronic obstructive lung disease. It is commonly utilized in the intensive care units, or for postoperative respiratory support in post-anesthesia care units. This report describes intraoperative support in non-invasive ventilation to neuroaxial anesthesia for an emergency upper abdominal surgery.

[Non-invasive mechanical ventilation and epidural anesthesia for an emergency open cholecystectomy]. / Ventilação mecânica não invasiva e anestesia peridural em colecistectomia aberta de emergência.

Non-invasive ventilation is an accepted treatment modality in both acute exacerbations of respiratory diseases and chronic obstructive lung disease. It is commonly utilized in the intensive care units, or for postoperative respiratory support in post-anesthesia care units. This report describes intraoperative support in non-invasive ventilation to neuroaxial anesthesia for an emergency upper abdominal surgery.

[Impact of the practising anesthesiologist team member on the laryngeal mask cuff pressures and adverse event rate]. / Impacto do anestesiologista em treinamento sobre as pressões do manguito de máscara laríngea e incidência de eventos adversos.

OBJECTIVE: We have planned to evaluate the laryngeal mask cuff pressures (LMcp) inflated by anesthesia workers of several seniority, without using manometer. METHODS: 180 patients scheduled to have short duration surgery with laryngeal mask were included in the study. Five anesthesia specialists (Group S), 10 residents (Group R) and 6 technicians (Group T) inflated the LMc; thereafter LMcp were measured with pressure manometer. Participants have repeated this practice in at least five different cases. LMcp higher than 60cm H2O at the initial placement or intraoperative period were adjusted to normal range. Sore throat was questioned postoperatively. Groups were compared in terms of mean LMcp and occupational experience. RESULTS: At the settlement of LM, LMcp pressures within the normal range were determined in 26 (14.4%) cases. Mean LMcp after LM placement in Group S, R and T were 101.2±14.0, 104.3±20.5cm H2O and 105.2±18.4cm H2O respectively (p>0.05). Mean LMcp values in all measurement time periods within the groups were above the normal limit (60cm H2O). When groups were compared in terms of LMcp, no difference has been found among pressure values. Occupational experience was 14.2±3.9; 3.3±1.1 and 6.6±3.8 years for specialists, residents and technicians respectively and measured pressure values were not different in regard of occupational experience. Seven (3.9%) patients had sore throat at the 24th hour interview. CONCLUSION: Considering lower possibility of normal adjustment of LMcp and ineffectiveness of occupational experience to obtain normal pressure values, it is suitable that all anesthesia practitioners should adjust LMcp with manometer.

Impact of the practising anesthesiologist team member on the laryngeal mask cuff pressures and adverse event rate / Impacto do anestesiologista em treinamento sobre as pressões do manguito de máscara laríngea e incidência de eventos adversos

OBJECTIVE: We have planned to evaluate the laryngeal mask cuff pressures (LMcp) inflated by anesthesia workers of several seniority, without using manometer. METHODS: 180 patients scheduled to have short duration surgery with laryngeal mask were included in the study. Five anesthesia specialists (Group S), 10 residents (Group R) and 6 technicians (Group T) inflated the LMc; thereafter LMcp were measured with pressure manometer. Participants have repeated this practice in at least five different cases. LMcp higher than 60 cm H2O at the initial placement or intraoperative period were adjusted to normal range. Sore throat was questioned postoperatively. Groups were compared in terms of mean LMcp and occupational experience. RESULTS: At the settlement of LM, LMcp pressures within the normal range were determined in 26 (14.4%) cases. Mean LMcp after LM placement in Group S, R and T were 101.2 ± 14.0, 104.3 ± 20.5 cm H2O and 105.2 ± 18.4 cm H2O respectively (p > 0.05). Mean LMcp values in all measurement time periods within the groups were above the normal limit (60 cm H2O). When groups were compared in terms of LMcp, no difference has been found among pressure values. Occupational experience was 14.2 ± 3.9; 3.3 ± 1.1 and 6.6 ± 3.8 years for specialists, residents and technicians respectively and measured pressure values were not different in regard of occupational experience. Seven (3.9%) patients had sore throat at the 24th hour interview. CONCLUSION: Considering lower possibility of normal adjustment of LMcp and ineffectiveness of occupational experience to obtain normal pressure values, it is suitable that all anesthesia practitioners should adjust LMcp with manometer.

OBJETIVO: Planejamos avaliar as pressões do manguito de máscara laríngea (PMML) inflado por profissionais da área de anestesiologia com tempos de serviço variados, sem o uso de manômetro. MÉTODOS: 180 pacientes agendados para cirurgia de curta duração com máscara laríngea foram incluídos no estudo. Cinco especialistas em anestesia (Grupo E), 10 residentes (Grupo R) e seis técnicos (Grupo T) inflaram os manguitos das máscaras laríngeas; subsequentemente, as PMML foram medidas com manômetro de pressão. Os participantes repetiram essa prática em pelo menos cinco casos diferentes. As PMML superiores a 60 cm H2O na colocação inicial ou no intraoperatório foram ajustadas para valores normais. Os pacientes foram questionados sobre a presença de dor de garganta no período pós-operatório. Os grupos foram comparados quanto à média das PMML e experiência profissional. RESULTADOS: Ao inserirem a ML, as pressões do manguito dentro da faixa normal foram determinadas em 26 (14,4%) casos. As médias das PMML após a inserção da ML pelos grupos E, R e T foram 101,2 ± 14,0, 104,3 ± 20,5 cm e 105,2 ± 18,4 cm H2O, respectivamente, (p > 0,05). A média dos valores das PMML em todos os períodos de mensuração entre os grupos estava acima do limite normal (60 cm H2O). Quando os grupos foram comparados quanto às PMML, nenhuma diferença foi encontrada entre os valores das pressões. A experiência profissional era de 14,2 ± 3,9; 3,3 ± 1,1 e 6,6 ± 3,8 anos para especialistas, residentes e técnicos, respectivamente, e os valores das pressões mensuradas não foram diferentes em relação à experiência profissional. Sete pacientes (3,9%) apresentaram dor de garganta durante a entrevista realizada na 24a hora. CONCLUSÃO: Levando-se em consideração uma possibilidade menor de ajuste da pressão do manguito da máscara laríngea (PMML) e da ineficácia da experiência profissional para a obtenção de valores normais das pressões, é adequado que todos os profissionais de anestesia ajustem as PMML com manômetro.

Impact of the practising anesthesiologist team member on the laryngeal mask cuff pressures and adverse event rate.

OBJECTIVE: We have planned to evaluate the laryngeal mask cuff pressures (LMcp) inflated by anesthesia workers of several seniority, without using manometer. METHODS: 180 patients scheduled to have short duration surgery with laryngeal mask were included in the study. Five anesthesia specialists (Group S), 10 residents (Group R) and 6 technicians (Group T) inflated the LMc; thereafter LMcp were measured with pressure manometer. Participants have repeated this practice in at least five different cases. LMcp higher than 60 cm H2O at the initial placement or intraoperative period were adjusted to normal range. Sore throat was questioned postoperatively. Groups were compared in terms of mean LMcp and occupational experience. RESULTS: At the settlement of LM, LMcp pressures within the normal range were determined in 26 (14.4%) cases. Mean LMcp after LM placement in Group S, R and T were 101.2 ± 14.0, 104.3 ± 20.5 cm H2O and 105.2 ± 18.4 cm H2O respectively (p > 0.05). Mean LMcp values in all measurement time periods within the groups were above the normal limit (60 cm H2O). When groups were compared in terms of LMcp, no difference has been found among pressure values. Occupational experience was 14.2 ± 3.9; 3.3 ± 1.1 and 6.6 ± 3.8 years for specialists, residents and technicians respectively and measured pressure values were not different in regard of occupational experience. Seven (3.9%) patients had sore throat at the 24th hour interview. CONCLUSION: Considering lower possibility of normal adjustment of LMcp and ineffectiveness of occupational experience to obtain normal pressure values, it is suitable that all anesthesia practitioners should adjust LMcp with manometer.

Postoperative analgesic effects of wound infiltration with tramadol and levobupivacaine in lumbar disk surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Wound infiltration with local anesthetics may improve postoperative analgesia. Tramadol has been shown to have effects similar to those of local anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of wound infiltration with levobupivacaine and tramadol on postoperative analgesia for lumbar discectomies. METHODS: Eighty adult patients who were scheduled to undergo elective lumbar discectomy operations were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to 4 groups: wound infiltration with 100 mg levobupivacaine (group L), 2 mg/kg tramadol (group T), 2 mg/kg tramadol plus 100 mg levobupivacaine (group LT), and saline (group C). Pain scores with the visual analog scale, patient-controlled analgesic consumption (pethidine), time to first analgesic treatment, and side effects were assessed during the postoperative period. RESULTS: The time to first analgesia was earliest in group C (11.3±2.2 min), followed by group L (163.0±216.3 min) and group T (803.2±268.4 min) (P<0.001). None of the patients in group LT required postoperative analgesic supplementation, and the visual analog scale scores were <3 at all measurement times (P<0.05). Postoperative opioid consumption was 196.0±71.6 mg in group C, 129.0±78.3 mg in group L, and 37.0±35.4 mg in group T (P<0.001). The incidence of side effects was lower in group LT than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wound infiltration with combined levobupivacaine and tramadol resulted in elimination of postoperative analgesic demand and reduction in the incidence of side effects. We conclude that infiltration of the wound site with combined levobupivacaine and tramadol provides significantly better analgesia compared with levobupivacaine or tramadol alone.