Frequency of Programmed Death Receptor Ligand 1 Expression and Clinicopathological Factors Associated With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer at a Tertiary Cancer Care Centre in South India.

Purpose Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor outcome compared to other subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment paradigm in metastatic diseases as well as in neoadjuvant setting. The response to these agents is affected by programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) receptor expression which are reported objectively as a score. PDL1 is a prognostic marker also. Here, we present clinicopathological characteristics of metastatic TNBCs, report the proportion of PDL1 expression and its association with clinicopathological factors as well as survival. Methods This is a prospective study carried out at a tertiary cancer care centre in South India. Case records of all breast cancer patients treated in two years between August 2021 and July 2023 were reviewed, patients with metastatic TNBC were selected. Patient's characteristics, histological features, molecular profile, and treatment were analyzed. PDL1 testing was carried out on pretreatment tumor tissue sections with immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Dako 22C3). PDL1 staining was interpreted as negative or positive based on combined positive score (CPS), with an expression less than 10 considered negative. Results A total of 118 patients were analyzed. With a median age of 46 years (36-65 years), 52.5% (62/118) were premenopausal. Family history of Ca Breast was seen in 22% (26/118) patients. A majority of patients had left-sided tumor 55.9% (66/118). Visceral metastasis was more common 96.6% (82/118) than skeletal. Radical intent of treatment was adopted in 10% as patients had oligometastatic disease at presentation. As front-line treatment, anthracycline-based chemotherapy was administered to the majority 54.2% (64/118). The PDL1 expression with CPS more or equal to 10 was seen in 32.2% (38/118) patients. Survival was associated with menopausal status (p value=0.000) and family history (p value=0.028) but not with PDL1 nor sidedness in our study. Estimated survival at 12 months in PDL1 negative case is 10 ± 0.29 months, while in PDL1 positive case it is slightly more at 10 ± 0.75 months, but difference was not found to be statistically significant (p value=0.15). Conclusion TNBCs are highly aggressive subtype with limited treatment options and poorer outcomes. Our study shows PDL1 expression in 31.66% of the cases similar to other literature from India. Survival is associated with menopausal status and family history. No association was found between survival and PDL1 as well sidedness in our study.

Mortality Audit of Cancer Patients in the Department of Medical Oncology at a Tertiary Cancer Care Centre in South India.

Considerable advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer have made a huge impact on morbidity and mortality from neoplastic diseases. However, cancer remains the leading cause of death across the world. This is a retrospective study carried out at a tertiary cancer care centre (Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore) in South India. Case records of all cancer patients who died while receiving inpatient treatment between January 2022 and December 2022 under the Department of Medical Oncology were reviewed and studied. There was a total of 240 deaths. Out of these, the majority of deaths 147 (61.25%) were patients with haematological malignancies while the remaining 93 (38.75%) were patients with solid tumours. In patients with solid tumours, the majority 49 (52.7%) were in the age group of 40 to 60 years while only 18 (19.35%) patients were less than 40 years. The majority of patients were male sex i.e. 55(59.1%) and undergoing treatment with palliative intent 81 (87%). The most common organ was the lung in 21 patients (22.6%) followed by the breast while the most common system involved was the gastrointestinal tract in 28 (30.1%) patients. The most frequent cause of death was progressive disease in 72 (77.4%) while sepsis (11 patients; 11.8%) was the second most frequent cause of death in solid tumours. In haematological malignancies, also a significant number of 57 (38.8%) patients were in the age group of 40 to 60 years. Fifty-two (35.3%) patients were in the age group of 22 to 40 years. The majority were male sex (79 patients; 53.7%). About the phase of treatment, the majority of deaths 45 (30.6%) were during induction and under evaluation. Those with relapse/refractory disease were 38 (25.9%). A substantial number of patients had acute myeloid leukaemia 47 (32%) and five (3.4%) deaths were acute promyelocytic leukaemia patients. Twenty-three patients (15.6%) had acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The most common cause of death was sepsis in 76 patients (51.7%) while intracranial bleeding was in 34 patients (23.1%). In some patients, there were multiple causes leading to death. Mortality audits are important to evaluate the services being provided at any centre. One can appreciate the lacunae in handling a particular disease or flaws in a treatment protocol or the staff delivering the treatment. Sepsis is the leading cause of death in patients with haematological malignancy; even in solid malignancy sepsis accounts for a substantial proportion of deaths and should be handled aggressively to save lives.

Treatment patterns and comparative analysis of non-intensive regimens in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients-a real-world experience from India.

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia have a poor prognosis. Data from developing countries is sparse in the literature. In this retrospective study, 402 patients aged ≥ 60 years, diagnosed between Jan 2013 and Dec 2017, were analyzed for treatment patterns and survival. Median age of the whole cohort was 68 years (range 61-84). A total of 213 patients (53.3%) refused care; 188 patients (46.7%) received either BSC, LDAC, or HMA. Survival (in months) was 3.9, 6.4, and 1.2 with LDAC, HMA, and BSC, respectively. One-year survival was 17.2% and 6% with HMA and LDAC, respectively (P = 0.02). Overall response rate (ORR) did not differ between HMA and LDAC group (p = 0.12). HMA cohort had higher complete responses (20.6% vs 7.4%, p = 0.02), stable disease (32.7% vs 13.5%, p = 0.02), and transfusion independence (TI) (46.5% vs 22.2%, p = 0.01). Survival did not differ between the groups if the patients achieved ORR (12.3 vs 9.8 p = 0.2) or TI (11.6 vs 6.4 p = 0.2). Stable disease with HMA led to longer survival (8.1 vs 5.3 p = 0.01). HMAs were more effective than LDAC irrespective of cytogenetic risk category and blasts, of note HMAs improved survival of poor risk patients (5.6 vs 2.9 p = 0.004). HMA treatment (HR = 0.48; 95% 0.29-0.79, p = 0.004) and transfusion independence (HR = 0.2; 95% 0.1-0.3, p = 0.0001) predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were frequent in HMA. Thrombocytopenia was the common adverse event with LDAC. Novel and cost-effective drugs are essential to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Role of prephase treatment prior to definitive chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: During the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, treatment-related toxicities are higher in the initial phase of treatment (First cycle effect). Toxicities can be tumor lysis syndrome, deterioration in performance status, febrile neutropenia, and rarely mortality. Prephase treatment before definitive chemotherapy is used in European countries to alleviate these toxicities. METHODS: This was a non-randomized study carried out with the aim to evaluate the role of prephase treatment given prior to definitive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts "prephase cohort" and "non-prephase cohort." Prephase cohort received prephase treatment consisting of vincristine (1 mg) on -6th day and prednisolone 100 mg daily for 7 days (-6th day to day 0). Prephase treatment was followed by CHOP/R-CHOP chemotherapy on day 1. Non-prephase cohort received chemotherapy without prephase. Both groups were followed up for 30 days post-first cycle chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with DLBCL (50 in each cohort) were enrolled. There was a significant improvement in performance status of the patients who received prephase. A majority of 92% patients attained ECOG performance status of either 0 or 1 before starting chemotherapy in the prephase cohort. Febrile neutropenia was lower (16%) in the prephase cohort as compared with the non-prephase cohort (34%; P = .037). CONCLUSION: Prephase treatment prior to definitive chemotherapy (CHOP ± Rituximab) improves the performance status and decreases first cycle effect in DLBCL patients.

Augmentation of antioxidant and iron(III) chelation properties of tertiary mixture of bioactive ligands.

The excess of iron in plasma and cellular compartment pose direct and indirect toxic effects. In the present investigation, we proposed additive function of nutritional bioactive ligands in combination which has shown enhanced antioxidant and iron(III) chelation property. The optimal interaction and in vitro antioxidant activity of tertiary mixture comprising of curcumin+quercetin+gallic acid was validated by central composite design (CCD) based on ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP). The additive denticity of nutritional bioactive ligands was investigated by UV-vis, FTIR & MALDI-TOF-MS analysis, which has given substantial evidence for the formation of tris-bidentate [curcumin-quercetin-gallic acid-Fe(III)] co-ordination complex. The in vivo proof of concept of the hypothesis was tested in iron intoxicated male wistar rats intoxicated with iron dextran. Co-administration curcumin+quercetin+gallic acid (CQG) exhibit dose dependent response & found effective in subsiding acute iron intoxication both at plasma and cellular level, evaluated by studies including serum ferritin, ICP-OES, lipid peroxidation and histopathology studies among others. Thus, we conclude that in vitro and in vivo studies supported our hypothesis to deduce additive function nutritional ligands to counteract direct and indirect effects of iron(III).