Ketorolac Use for Pain Management in Trauma Patients With Rib Fractures Does not Increase of Acute Kidney Injury or Incidence of Bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Ketorolac is useful in acute pain management to avoid opiate-related complications; however, some surgeons fear associated acute kidney injury (AKI) and bleeding despite a paucity of literature on ketorolac use in trauma patients. We hypothesized that our institution's use of intravenous ketorolac for rib fracture pain management did not increase the incidence of bleeding or AKI. METHODS: Rib fracture patients aged 15 years and above admitted between January 2016-June 2018 were identified in our trauma registry along with frequency of bleeding events. AKI was defined as ≥ 1.5x increase in serum creatinine from baseline measured on the second day of admission (after 24 hours of resuscitation) or an increase of ≥ .3 mg/dL over a 48-hour period. Patients receiving ketorolac were compared to patients with no ketorolac use. RESULTS: Two cohorts of 199 control and 205 ketorolac patients were found to be similar in age, gender, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), injury severity score, intravenous radiocontrast received, and transfusion requirements. Analysis revealed no difference in frequency of AKI using both definitions (8% vs. 7.3%, P = .79) and (19.6% vs. 15.1%, P = .24), respectively, or bleeding events (2.5% vs. 0%, P = .03). Logistic regression demonstrated that ketorolac use was not an independent predictor for AKI but age and admission SBP < 90 were. CONCLUSION: Use of ketorolac in this cohort of trauma patients with rib fractures did not increase the incidence of AKI or bleeding events.

Use of the EVARREST patch for penetrating cardiac injury.

Penetrating cardiac injuries have a pre-hospital mortality of 94% with a subsequent in-hospital mortality of 50% among initial survivors (Leite et al., 2017 [1]). The Western Trauma Association (WTA) guidelines recommend resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for patients with penetrating torso trauma and less than 15 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) Burlew et al. (2012) [2]. Penetrating cardiac injuries are classically repaired using skin-stapling devices and/or suture repair with or without pledgets (Wall et al., 1997 [3]). In this study, we present a case of penetrating cardiac injury where all the aforementioned techniques failed, and a new approach was explored. A fibrinogen/thrombin patch was used in this clinical setting, which is an off-label use of the product, we here present our encouraging outcome.

State of Rib Fracture Care: A NTDB Review of Analgesic Management and Surgical Stabilization.

Thoracic analgesia plays a key role in management and outcomes of rib fractures and can generally be broken down into oral or parenteral medication administration and regional analgesia. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) may be an underused resource in the management of rib fractures. This study describes recent trends in rib fracture management and outcomes. National Trauma Data Bank datasets from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. Patients with three or more rib fractures were identified, and the frequencies of epidural analgesia (EA), other regional analgesia, and SSRF were analyzed. Those older than 65 years were more likely to be admitted to the ICU but had shorter ICU length of stay, lower intubation, and need for tracheostomy rates. In addition, those older than 65 years had about 2.5 times higher mortality (6.3% vs 2.6%, P < 0.001). EA was used in only 3 per cent of the population and more commonly in the older than 65 years group (3.7% vs 2.8%, P < 0.001). Regardless of age, SSRF was more commonly performed when compared with the placement of EA (5.8% vs 3%). This difference was even greater in the younger than 65 years group, where 7 per cent underwent SSRF. Utilization of EA remains low nationally. SSRF should be considered not only for chest wall stabilization but also as an analgesic modality in selected patients. A more complete accounting of analgesic care in rib fracture patients is needed to allow a more detailed analysis of analgesia for rib fracture-related pain to elucidate optimal treatment.

Implementing Daily Leadership Safety Huddles in a Public Hospital: Bridging the Gap.

BACKGROUND: A Leadership Safety Huddle was instituted in efforts to improve communication and make safety culture a priority at our institution. The Huddle is a transparent, regularly recurring forum of clinical and administrative hospital leaders, in which safety issues and concerns are identified, shared, and swiftly addressed. METHODS: Metrics regarding huddle effectiveness in 3 areas are studied: information technology (IT) services ticket resolution time, bladder catheterization, and one-to-one inpatient monitoring. RESULTS: Analysis revealed effectiveness of the huddle on quality of inpatient care and cost savings. Survey revealed 75% or higher favorable responses to huddle improving communication, transparency, time to resolution of issues, ability to voice concerns, and patient safety. As a result of huddle implementation, metrics showed 46% reduction in IT ticket turnaround time (P = .0001), 28% reduction in non-intensive care unit bladder catheter days (P = .011), and 10% decrease in continuous observations (P = .008), allowing a 24% reduction in cost (P = .001) with quarterly savings of $139 107.00. CONCLUSION: These metrics demonstrate how huddles are instrumental in infusing and sustaining a culture of patient safety in hospitals.

Can specialized surgical simulation influence resident career choice?

OBJECTIVE: Our institution began Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) simulation course in 2007 for senior residents with the aim of increasing opportunities for surgical trainees to gain operative trauma experience. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of the ATOM simulation course on residents' choice of trauma as a career as demonstrated by entrance into surgical critical care (SCC) fellowships. DESIGN: Retrospective study of institutional data on graduating residents from 2002 to 2015. Residents were divided into pre-ATOM (2002-08) and post- (institution of) ATOM (2009-15) cohorts. The percentage of residents entering SCC fellowships was then compared among cohorts as well as to national trends. RESULTS: Nationally the pre-ATOM group had 7057 graduating general surgery (GS) residents (847 SCC) and post-ATOM had 7581 graduating GS residents (1268 SCC). Locally the pre-ATOM group consisted of 40 graduating GS residents (1 SCC) and while the post-ATOM cohort had 51 graduating GS residents (9 SCC). The number of SCC fellows increased by 4.7% nationally and 15.7% institutionally between the two study groups. The increased interest in SCC was more than could be accounted for by national trends. CONCLUSIONS: Interest in a career in trauma was increased among residents graduating from this single institution after instituting ATOM as part of the educational curriculum.

Does Resident Trauma Exposure Affect Advanced Trauma Operative Management Course Experience?

The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course is a simulation course adopted by the American College of Surgeons to teach operative management of primarily penetrating, traumatic injuries. Although it is clear that overall operative trauma exposure is decreasing, the educational benefit of ATOM for residents with different amounts of trauma exposure remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether residents from trauma centers experienced less benefit from the ATOM course when compared with residents from nontrauma centers. We compared two groups of residents who take ATOM through our institutional course, those from trauma centers and those from nontrauma centers. ATOM pre- and postcourse evaluations of knowledge and self-efficacy were collected from October 2007 to June 2013. Overall residents from three institutions, two trauma centers (100 residents) and one nontrauma center (34 residents), were included in the study. All resident groups had statistically significant improvement in knowledge and self-efficacy after taking the ATOM course (P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in improvement relative to each of the groups in the ATOM categories of knowledge and self-efficacy. Our data show that residents with different levels of trauma exposure had similar pre- and postcourse scores as well as improvement in the ATOM evaluations. As operative trauma continues to decrease the ATOM course shows benefit for all residents regardless of the depth of their clinical trauma exposure in surgical residency.

Factors associated with trauma clinic follow-up compliance after discharge: experience at an urban Level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in access to postdischarge services for trauma patients exist, and clinic follow-up remains an important avenue to ensure initial and continued access to postdischarge services. In addition, follow-up is vital to rigorous long-term trauma outcomes research. However, there is a relative paucity of literature specifically addressing clinic follow-up. The purposes of this study were to elucidate factors associated with clinic follow-up compliance and noncompliance after discharge from an urban Level I trauma center and to confirm the prevailing notion that follow-up in trauma clinic is poor. METHODS: Our trauma registry was queried for all trauma service discharges of patients 18 years and older for a 2-year period. Patients with incomplete information were excluded. Demographic data such as race/ethnicity and insurance status were collected on all patients. Primary outcome was defined as trauma clinic follow-up within 4 weeks after discharge. Patients compliant with follow-up were compared with noncompliant patients. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were applied, there were 1,818 discharges included in the analysis, with 564 (31%) complying with follow-up (p < 0.001). Factors significantly associated with follow-up noncompliance included patients older than 35 years, white race, Medicaid/Medicare payers, blunt mechanism, extended hospital length of stay, and discharge to rehabilitation facilities. No insurance, penetrating mechanism, short hospital stay, discharge to home, and weekend discharge were all significantly associated with follow-up compliance. Discharge on weekends and to home were independent predictors of compliance, whereas, Medicaid/Medicare insurance status and operative intervention were independent predictors of noncompliance. CONCLUSION: This study indentifies factors associated with trauma clinic follow-up compliance and confirms the notion that trauma clinic follow-up compliance at an urban Level I trauma center is alarmingly low. These findings may serve as targets to improve follow-up, thereby improving trauma outcomes research and long-term outcomes. Consequently, clinic follow-up compliance warrants further study and consideration as an essential trauma registry datum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.

Development and evaluation of the advanced trauma operative management course.

BACKGROUND: The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course was developed as a model for teaching operative trauma techniques to surgical residents, fellows, and attending surgeons as the number of these cases decreases. METHODS: The ATOM course consists of lectures and a porcine operative experience. Comprehensive evaluation of ATOM was designed to assess participant learning in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Data on the first 50 participants were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Participants included 20 expert traumatologists, 9 general surgeons, 9 trauma fellows, 8 general surgery fifth-year residents, and 4 general surgery fourth-year residents. All groups showed improvement in knowledge, with results in the expert and fellow groups reaching statistical significance. Self-efficacy (self-confidence) also improved, with all groups reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This course creates life-like situations in a standardized fashion that, along with didactic instruction, improves knowledge and operative confidence for practicing surgeons and surgeons-in-training.