Contextual determinants of mass drug administration performance: Modelling fourteen years of lymphatic filariasis treatments in West Africa.

BACKGROUND: Effective mass drug administration (MDA) is the cornerstone in the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) and a critical component in combatting all neglected tropical diseases for which preventative chemotherapy is recommended (PC-NTDs). Despite its importance, MDA coverage, however defined, is rarely investigated systematically across time and geography. Most commonly, investigations into coverage react to unsatisfactory outcomes and tend to focus on a single year and health district. Such investigations omit more macro-level influences including sociological, environmental, and programmatic factors. The USAID NTD database contains measures of performance from thousands of district-level LF MDA campaigns across 14 years and 10 West African countries. Specifically, performance was measured as an MDA's epidemiological coverage, calculated as persons treated divided by persons at risk. This analysis aims to explain MDA coverage across time and geography in West Africa using sociological, environmental, and programmatic factors. METHODOLOGY: The analysis links epidemiological coverage data from 3,880 LF MDAs with contextual, non-NTD data via location (each MDA was specific to a health district) and time (MDA month, year). Contextual data included rainfall, temperature, violence or social unrest, COVID-19, the 2014 Ebola outbreak, road access/isolation, population density, observance of Ramadan, and the number of previously completed MDAs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We fit a hierarchical linear regression model with coverage as the dependent variable and performed sensitivity analyses to confirm the selection of the explanatory factors. Above average rainfall, COVID-19, Ebola, violence and social unrest were all significantly associated with lower coverage. Years of prior experience in a district and above average temperature were significantly associated with higher coverage. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These generalized and context-focused findings supplement current literature on coverage dynamics and MDA performance. Findings may be used to quantify typically anecdotal considerations in MDA planning. The model and methodology are offered as a tool for further investigation.

[Evaluation of therapeutic coverage of mass treatment campaign against lymphatic filariasis in two health districts in Burkina Faso]. / Évaluation de la couverture thérapeutique de la campagne de traitement de masse contre la filariose lymphatique dans deux districts sanitaires au Burkina Faso.

Background & rationale: Burkina Faso has been implementing preventive chemotherapy against lymphatic filariasis since 2001. While 61 health districts (HDs) have stopped mass drug administration (MDA), transmission persists in 9 HDs despite good reported MDA coverage. To validate the reported coverage, an independent post-MDA survey was conducted in Tenkodogo and Fada N'Gourma HDs in September 2018. Materials & methods: The study population consisted of all persons in the visited communities. The Coverage survey sample builder (CSSB) tool was used to calculate the sample size and to conduct the random selection of households. A total of 30 villages per HD were selected. The investigators were Ministry of Education agents and health workers not involved in MDA. Data were collected on smartphones through the KoBoCollect application regarding age, sex, drug ingestion (ivermectin + albendazole), adverse events, and whether respondents understood MDA guidelines. Stata Version 14 software was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 3,741 individuals were surveyed, 53.3% were female and the median age was 14 years. Surveyed epidemiological coverage was 74% [95% CI: 72-76.1] in Fada N'Gourma and 79.1% [95% CI: 77.2-80.9] in Tenkodogo, compared to reported coverages of 82.6% and 83% respectively. Village-level coverage ranged from 32.9% to 100% in Fada N'Gourma and from 56.7% to 93.3% in Tenkodogo. In total, 99% of those treated said they had swallowed the drugs in front of the community drug distributor (CDD) and confirmed the use of dose poles. The main reasons for non-treatment were non-visitation of the compound by CDD (54%) and absences during MDA (43%). Results showed that surveyed coverage was lower than reported coverage in both HDs, yet both were above the 65% threshold recommended by WHO. However, major variations of coverage have been noted among villages. Directly observed treatment appeared to have been well respected. Discussion & conclusion: The main challenges to increase coverage will be the systematic revisiting of households with absentees and the targeting of all households in each village.