RESUMO
Background: To investigate the impact of the M184V/I mutation on virologic response to dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG + 3TC) in suppressed-switch populations, a meta-analysis was performed using virologic outcomes from people with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (PWH) with and without M184V/I before DTG + 3TC switch in real-world studies identified via systematic literature review. Sensitivity analyses were performed using data from PWH with M184V/I in interventional studies identified via targeted literature review. Methods: Single-arm meta-analyses using common- and random-effects models were used to estimate proportions of PWH with virologic failure (VF) among real-world populations with and without M184V/I and interventional study participants with M184V/I at 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Results: Literature reviews identified 5 real-world studies from 3907 publications and 51 abstracts meeting inclusion criteria and 5 interventional studies from 1789 publications and 3 abstracts. All time points had low VF incidence in PWH with M184V/I (real-world: 1.43%-3.81%; interventional: 0.00%) and without (real-world: 0.73%-2.37%). Meta-analysis-estimated proportions (95% confidence interval) with VF were low at weeks 24, 48, and 96, respectively, for PWH with M184V/I (real-world: 0.01 [.00-.04], 0.03 [.01-.06], and 0.04 [.01-.07]; interventional: 0.00 [.00-.02], 0.00 [.00-.01], and 0.00 [.00-.03]) and without (real-world: 0.00 [.00-.02], 0.02 [.01-.04], and 0.02 [.00-.05]). One real-world study (n = 712) reported treatment-emergent M184V at VF in 1 of 652 (0.15%) PWH without prior M184V/I. Conclusions: Results suggest that prior M184V/I has minimal impact on virologic suppression after switching to DTG + 3TC and provide reassurance when considering switching regimens in virologically suppressed PWH with incomplete treatment history or limited treatment options.
RESUMO
Aim: Assess treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Europe. Patients & methods: Cross-sectional, retrospective, web-based survey of AML-treating healthcare professionals (HCPs) in 12 European countries. Results: 320 HCPs provided information on 1280 TN or R/R patients. Patients ineligible versus eligible for intensive induction therapy required more general practitioner visits (4.1 vs 2.4), more uses of healthcare-related transport (6.9 vs 4.5), but less hospitalization (11.4 vs 27.5 days). Differences were observed in HRU and treatment patterns across countries. Conclusions: This analysis of 'real-world' patients with TN or R/R AML in Europe demonstrates substantial healthcare use, including higher use of resources in patients ineligible for intensive induction therapy.
Lay abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common cancer, mostly affecting elderly people. Older patients with AML are often unable to receive intensive chemotherapy and they may have limited treatment options, resulting in poor outcomes. This study analyzed the management of AML across 12 European countries and collected data for 1280 patients. Patients who were unable to receive intensive therapy required more general practitioner visits and more use of healthcare-related transport than those who received intensive therapies, but fewer hospital visits. The use of AML therapies also varied across some countries. AML treatment, particularly that associated with hospital stays and related travel, can have a negative impact on the patient's quality of life; therefore, new AML therapies that can reduce the treatment burden will be important in the future.
