A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patients.

BACKGROUND: We developed computer-based virtual patient (VP) cases to complement an interactive continuing medical education (CME) course that emphasizes skills practice using standardized patients (SP). Virtual patient simulations have the significant advantages of requiring fewer personnel and resources, being accessible at any time, and being highly standardized. Little is known about the educational effectiveness of these new resources. We conducted a randomized trial to assess the educational effectiveness of VPs and SPs in teaching clinical skills. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of VP cases when compared with live SP cases in improving clinical skills and knowledge. DESIGN: Randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five health care providers (registered nurses 45%, physicians 15%, other provider types 40%) who attended a CME program. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive either 4 live cases (n=32) or 2 live and 2 virtual cases (n=23). Other aspects of the course were identical for both groups. RESULTS: Participants in both groups were equivalent with respect to pre-post workshop improvement in comfort level (P=.66) and preparedness to respond (P=.61), to screen (P=.79), and to care (P=.055) for patients using the skills taught. There was no difference in subjective ratings of effectiveness of the VPs and SPs by participants who experienced both (P=.79). Improvement in diagnostic abilities were equivalent in groups who experienced cases either live or virtually. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in performance and diagnostic ability were equivalent between the groups and participants rated VP and SP cases equally. Including well-designed VPs has a potentially powerful and efficient place in clinical skills training for practicing health care workers.

Developing models for pediatric residency training in managed care settings.

The preparation of pediatric residents to function optimally in managed care environments challenges educators to create a new set of educational objectives and competencies and to incorporate these into curricula that are already full. Many of the skills needed to practice managed care are those that have been required for the practice of pediatrics in any setting. Nevertheless, the emergence of managed care requires the identification of new knowledge to be acquired and new skills and attitudes to be incorporated into daily practice. These competencies can be identified most thoroughly through collaboration among physicians, educators, and leaders of managed care organizations. This joint effort should also serve to establish a foundation on which collaborative, mutually beneficial learning environments can be created. The development of curricula that provide the opportunities needed to attain managed care proficiencies requires an individualized approach for each program that takes into account the degree of managed care penetration in each training environment. Programs in which a managed care approach to patient care predominates will be able to promote most easily their trainees' incorporation of these principles into routine practice. Those with less regular exposure will be forced either to promote managed care principles in an environment in which they may not be accepted or practiced, or to join in partnership with managed care organizations (MCOs) to train residents. Regardless of the setting, evaluation methodologies must be developed to ensure that each of the core competencies has been learned, can be applied to clinical situations, and is retained throughout the training period. These efforts require the development of faculty who understand and can model a managed care approach to patient management. The ongoing evolution of managed care systems encourages the development of new, creative strategies to train faculty, who may find themselves learning about this emerging environment at the same time as are their trainees.

ECFMG assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools and to determine the reliability and validity of the assessment and the feasibility of large-scale administration. DESIGN: The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) clinical competence study included (1) clinical encounters with standardized patients to assess history taking, physical examination, and communication skills; (2) laser videodisk pictorials to assess identification and interpretation of diagnostic procedures; (3) written clinical vignettes to assess diagnosis and management skills; and (4) assessment of spoken English. A uniform method of operating the test centers and of training the standardized patients was developed. SETTING: Medical schools and their primary teaching hospitals and affiliated hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred twenty-four first-year residents, of whom 525 are graduates of foreign medical schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores, reliability coefficients, validity measures, feasibility of multisite administration, trends of scores over time, and acceptability by examinees. RESULTS: The ECFMG clinical competence assessment was conducted at four geographically separate test centers. Reliability coefficients were high (.85) for the integrated clinical encounter and were in a reasonable range (.71 to .82) for all test components. The assessment adds to the predictability of the residents' performance in the hospital over that of current ECFMG certification examinations. Test security was addressed by demonstrating no consistent pattern of change in scores over testing dates. Virtually all examinees thought the assessment was appropriate. Standardized patients were able to assess spoken English accurately. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of conducting a reliable and valid test of clinical competence for graduates of foreign medical schools was demonstrated for this test population.

Development of agoraphobia after surviving cancer.

We present a case conference on a 32-year-old accountant who developed embryonal carcinoma of the testis, two months after the birth of a son with a missing leg. His cancer was successfully treated with surgery and chemotherapy. After 5 years, when he was told that he need not be closely followed by his physicians anymore because he had been cured of cancer, he developed agoraphobia with panic attacks. This interfered with his occupational and social adjustment. His phobia was treated successfully with pharmacotherapy, behavior therapy, and psychotherapy. We explore the psychologic impact of cancer, the activation of separation anxiety and aggressive impulses after its successful treatment, the crippling nature of his agoraphobia, and the ingredients of his successful response to treatment.