Ropivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration for postpartum perineal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To systematically and meta-analytically examine the efficacy of ropivacaine versus lidocaine infiltration for controlling postpartum perineal pain secondary to spontaneous tear or selective episiotomy. METHODS: We searched four databases from inception to 20-September-2020. We included all relevant randomized and nonrandomized studies and assessed their risk of bias. We pooled data as standardized mean difference (SMD), weighted mean difference (WMD), or odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria (one and three studies were nonrandomized and randomized, respectively). There were 405 patients; 205 and 200 patients received lidocaine and ropivacaine, respectively. There was no significant difference between ropivacaine and lidocaine groups with regard to visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at suturing (WMD = -0.04, 95 % CI [-0.41, 0.32], P = 0.82), 2 h (SMD = -1.50, 95 % CI [-3.50, 0.50], P = 0.14), and 24 h (SMD = -0.40, 95 % CI [-1.15, 0.34], P = 0.29) post repair of perineal trauma. Proportion of patients with mild VAS pain score ≤3 at 24 h was significantly higher in the ropivacaine group (OR = 4.34, 95 % CI [2.03, 9.29], P < 0.001). Proportion of patients who did not require additional analgesia during the first 24 h post perineal repair did not significantly differ between both groups (OR = 2.44, 95 % CI [0.09, 68.21], P = 0.60). Ropivacaine group achieved higher maternal satisfaction (OR = 7.13, 95 % CI [3.63, 13.99], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During repair of postpartum perineal trauma, pain efficacy is relatively longer with ropivacaine but safety is not well investigated. High-quality and large-sized studies are needed to consolidate these findings.

Comparison of the skin-to-epidural space distance at the thoracic and lumbar levels in children using magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have attempted to estimate the approximate distance from the skin-to-epidural space using different imaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and direct needle measurements. The objective of our study was to compare the distance from the skin to the epidural space (SED) at multiple levels, focusing on T6-7, T9-10, and L2-3 using MRI. METHODS: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, sagittal T2-weighted MRI images of the spine of 108 children in the age group ranging from 3 months to 8 years undergoing radiological evaluation in the supine position at our institution were analyzed. The SED at T6-7 and T9-10 levels (straight and inclined) and SED at L2-3 (straight) were determined and compared using repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t-tests with a Bonferroni correction for 10 pairwise comparisons (P < 0.005 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: The average SED (measured straight and inclined) was 18.2 mm and 21.6 mm at T6-7; 18.3 mm and 20.5 mm at T9-10; and 21.8 mm (straight) at L2-3. The repeated-measures ANOVA F-test indicated significant variability in SED (P < 0.001) among the 5 measurements obtained. At the P < 0.005 significance level, corrected for multiple comparisons, the SED (straight) at T9-10 straight was shorter than the other measured distances. CONCLUSION: The distance from the skin to the epidural space is not constant at various vertebral levels. At the levels measured, it was greatest at the lumbar level and at least at the thoracic level of T9-10. A single predictive formula was not applicable for calculating the approximate SED at all vertebral levels.