Experiences of patients undergoing IVF treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the willingness of patients with infertility to continue with their in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in the reproductive, endocrine, and infertility medicine department (REIMD) at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients that were planned to undergo IVF treatment at REIMD were contacted and asked about whether they would like to start IVF treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic from August 2020 to August 2021. Data was analyzed using the SPSS version 24. Statistics obtained as means and standard deviations from continuous variables correlated with the Chi-square test and results were considered significant at p≤0.05. RESULTS: Of the 400 participants, 245 (61.25%) were between the ages of 30-39 years. About 42.75% (n=171) of the patients had 6-10 years of infertility, and 18% (n=72) had at least one pregnancy but no living children. While 64.7% (n=259) of the participants responded on the first call, 83% (n=332) agreed to continue their treatment. Of those, 13% (n=43) preferred to book appointments as soon as possible; 29.8% (n=99) preferred booking within three months; while 57.2% (n=190) chose to book after three months. From our sample, 86.8% (n=59) were afraid to contract the virus and the choice to delay the IVF treatment correlated with the patient's age (p<0.001) and duration of infertility (p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic affected IVF treatment courses, and many patients were afraid to be infected during this pandemic.

Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction: a Saudi national survey.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD) is a global health problem affecting millions of women worldwide and comprises a broad range of clinical dysfunctions such as urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) vaginal laxity (VL), vaginal wind (VW), and overactive bladder (OAB). This study aims to estimate the prevalence of PFD among Saudi women attending primary health care centers (PHCCs) across 13 regions of Saudi Arabia and their characteristics along with associated factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 2,289 non-pregnant women. The probability population proportional sampling technique was employed followed by a convenient sampling technique to recruit eligible women. Types of PFD were assessed using a self-administered electronic questionnaire. Pelvic Floor Distress Index (PFDI-20) was used to assess the primary study outcomes (FI, VL, POP, VW, and OAB). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent associated factors for PFD. RESULTS: The findings showed that 830 women (36.3%) had any type of UI. Stress UI affected726 (31.7%) women, whilst 525 women (22.9%) had urge UI. VL occurred in 505 women (22.1%), whilst POP occurred in 536 women (23.4%). VW occurred in 733 participants and (32%) 1238 women (54.1%) had OAB. The multivariate analysis suggested that region, location, parity, and assisted birth were significantly associated with UI, VL, FI and PFD (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PFD is a common condition among Saudi women. UI, VL, VW, OAB, POP and FI increased consistently among urban women with increased age, greater parity, assisted birth, and post-menopausal status.

Depression symptoms in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of depression symptoms in women with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and to assess their quality of life (QOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case-control study assessing depression and its severity in women with PFD (urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence) was conducted. Patients attending the Urogynecology Department of the Women's Specialized Hospital, King Fahad Medical City, were requested to complete the self-reported Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and Beck Inventory Scale for Depression. Women presenting with no PFD symptoms were recruited from other clinics as controls. RESULTS: Data of 100 women diagnosed with PFD (mean age, 45.18±10.50 years) and 100 control participants (mean age, 45.14±13.03 years; P=0.644) were collected. Patients with PFD showed significantly higher (7.3%) body mass index (BMI) (32.59±6.22 kg/m2) than controls (30.37±8.08 kg/m2) (OR, 1.044, 95% CI: 1.001-1.091; P=0.043). Patients with PFD exhibited a threefold higher prevalence of depression symptoms than controls (43% vs 14%, respectively; P<0.001). QOL scores in patients with PFD were significantly higher in patients with depression (P-values, 0.024 to <0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between depression and PFD, and QOL scores in patients with PFD were significantly higher in patients with depression.

Risks of Myrrh usage in pregnancy.

Recurrent miscarriage places a huge psychological burden on a woman who is trying to conceive. Meanwhile, the use of traditional medicine still plays an important role within the Saudi Arabian culture, where many patients still seek alternative forms of therapy. However, this traditional way of treatment might expose patients to many hazards. We present a case of a 32-year-old pregnant woman with a history of infertility and recurrent miscarriages. She used large amounts of myrrh herbs for 2 months, since a traditional healer told her that her current pregnancy would progress safely by its use. However, her pregnancy was complicated with an acute abdominal pain. Her symptom was relieved as soon as she stopped taking myrrh. We assume that myrrh acted as a uterine stimulant causing acute abdominal pain. Scientific studies should be carried out to evaluate the safety of Myrrh intake during pregnancy.

Vitamin D deficiency among subfertile women: case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare the dietary vitamin D and calcium intake among subfertile women (cases) versus pregnant women (controls) and to determine the vitamin D levels in the subfertile and pregnant women. The study design was an observational case-control study where a total of 181 (83 previously diagnosed subfertile cases from various causes and 98 pregnant controls) women of reproductive age. A validated questionnaire was used where it focused on key indicators evaluating vitamin D-related factors. Blood was withdrawn for the measurement of serum calcium, albumin and phosphate to exclude secondary causes that might affect vitamin D level. RESULTS: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was significantly higher in the subfertile group than controls (59.0% versus 40.4%; p < 0.01). Calcium supplements intake was significantly higher in controls than the subfertile group (64.6% versus 10.0%; p value < 0.001). Total dietary vitamin D intake (> 400 IU/day) was significantly higher in the controls than the subfertile group. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among subfertile women. Optimization of serum calcium and vitamin D levels is encouraged.