Assessing the environmental impact of gold production from double refractory ore in a large-scale facility.

Despite the strict environmental management regulations, there is still a considerable adverse impact on the ecosystem and human health when it comes to large-scale gold mining operations. Gold mining is an energy-intensive process that can discharge substantial quantities of chemicals combined with gaseous emissions into the environment. Considering gold mining's significant role in Nevada's economy and the growing concern about climate change, it's necessary to investigate the environmental burdens of this sector. To provide a comprehensive environmental perspective on the large-scale gold mining operations in Nevada, this study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate the environmental burdens of gold production from double refractory ores in the roasting process. The Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) method was used to evaluate the categories of acidification, ozone depletion, global warming, smog, carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, respiratory effects, and fossil fuel depletion. Results showed that major contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were grinding and off-gas treatment stages being responsible for 34.80 % and 56.10 % of the total global warming, respectively. The carbon footprint for producing one kg of gold was 12,200 kg CO2-eq. Sensitivity analysis was also employed on electricity to observe the influence of electricity on key contributor stages. A 10 % change in electricity reduced the GHG emissions in crushing and grinding by 12.2 % and 7.10 %, respectively, while delivering an insignificant effect on the off-gas treatment. Significantly, this study stands as the first initiative to apply LCA in the North American mining industry, with a unique focus on the off-gas treatment post-roasting and its associated emissions. Our findings can serve as a foundational database, aiding stakeholders in making informed decisions and enhancing sustainable practices in the gold mining industry.

Comparative life cycle analysis of critical materials recovery from spent Li-ion batteries.

The development of new generations of electric vehicles is expected to drive the growth of lithium-ion batteries in the global market. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method was utilized in this study to evaluate the environmental impacts of various hydrometallurgical processes in critical materials recovery from lithium-ion battery (LIB) cathode powder. The main objective of this work was to fill the knowledge gap regarding the environmental sustainability of various processes in LIB recycling and to generate a comprehensive comparison of the environmental burdens caused by numerous hydrometallurgical methods. According to this investigation, leaching with acetic acid, formic acid, maleic acid, and DL-malic acid demonstrates lower environmental impacts compared to lactic acid, ascorbic acid, succinic acid, citric acid, trichloroacetic acid, and tartaric acid. Among inorganic acids, nitric acid and hydrochloric acid show higher environmental impacts compared to sulfuric acid. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that leaching with some organic acids such as citric, succinic, ascorbic, trichloroacetic, and tartaric acids leads to higher negative environmental impacts in most environmental categories compared to inorganic acids like sulfuric and hydrochloric acid. Therefore, not all organic acids utilized in the leaching of critical and strategic materials from cathode powder can enhance environmental sustainability in the recycling process. The results of the solvent extraction study as a downstream process of leaching show that sodium hydroxide, organic reagents, and kerosene have the highest environmental impact among all inputs in this process. Generally, solvent extraction has a greater environmental impact compared to the leaching process.

Recovery of valuable metals from spent mobile phone printed circuit boards using biochar in indirect bioleaching.

Improving the bioleaching efficiency of metals from spent mobile phone printed circuit boards (PCBs) in a short time has been of major interest in recent years. In this paper, a novel cheap catalyst (oak wood biochar) was used to improve the copper and nickel bioleaching efficiency from spent mobile phone PCBs. The biochar was derived from oak wood through slow pyrolysis at a low temperature of 500 °C for 1h. The results of RSM optimization indicated that the optimum conditions to maximize copper and nickel recovery were 1.6 g/L biochar and 16 g/L pulp density. The findings indicated that compared to without the presence of biochar, the leach yields of copper and nickel were high. As much as 98% of copper and 82% of nickel were leached by indirect bioleaching under optimum conditions. The better performance in the presence of biochar is due to both galvanic interactions between biochar and solid waste. The biochemical characterization of bioleaching solution suggested that the high concentration of biochar (> 1.6 g/L) led to copper absorption by functional groups on the surface of biochar. Compared to chemical leaching, the bioleaching has better performance. Under optimum conditions, the copper and nickel recovery by indirect bioleaching was 36% and 64% more than that by chemical leaching. Also, it is found that biochar has a positive effect on the chemical leaching process. Therefore, in this paper, the function of biochar was elaborated not only in bio-hydrometallurgy but also in the hydrometallurgy process.