Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 224
Filtrar
2.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 2024 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis is a significant public health burden and lacks a gold standard for diagnosis. Up to 1/3 of patients are incorrectly diagnosed. The skin biopsy has been proposed as the gold standard. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluate the histopathologic characteristics and tissue culture positivity of biopsies in patients diagnosed with cellulitis seen by our inpatient dermatology consultation service. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who were hospitalized with a skin and soft tissue infection at our institution between 2011 and 2020 and underwent a skin biopsy. RESULTS: Those with a positive tissue culture were more likely to die within 30 days compared with those with negative tissue cultures (26% vs. 6%, P = 0.048). Patients who died within 30 days were more likely to have acute interstitial inflammation as a feature on histopathology (38%, P = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: Single institutional design, unintentional exclusion of patients with organism-specific diagnosis, and selection for a medically complex patient population because of the nonroutine collection of biopsies. CONCLUSION: Positive tissue cultures and histopathology showing acute interstitial space inflammation on skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) biopsies are associated with increased mortality and thus may serve as indicators of poor prognosis.

3.
JAMA Dermatol ; 2024 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922593

RESUMO

This case report describes a man in his 20s with psoriasis who was receiving stable treatment with adalimumab for 3 years and was diagnosed with pyoderma gangrenosum and was referred for a 6-month history of multiple inflammatory ulcers on the right dorsal foot and ankle.

4.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 397, 2024 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878169

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pyoderma gangrenosum, acne, and suppurative hidradenitis (PASH) syndrome is a rare condition characterized by clinical features of all three dermatologic conditions. The management of PASH syndrome is difficult, with no consensus on treatment guidelines. Since PASH syndrome can increase morbidity and adversely impact quality of life, better characterization of effective therapies is needed. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) treated at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center between 2015 and 2021. PG diagnosis was confirmed via PARACELSUS score. Subsequent chart review identified eight patients with concomitant hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and acne who were clinically diagnosed with PASH syndrome. RESULTS: Eight patients were clinically diagnosed with PASH syndrome based on their clinical presentation at our institution. Seven patients had failed some type of medical therapy prior to presentation, including topical corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, oral antibiotics, and biologics. One patient had also tried surgical drainage at an outside institution. Six patients were effectively treated with biologics, usually in combination with other therapies. One patient experienced improvement of her skin lesions after diagnosis and treatment of her underlying hematologic malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Medical management with biologics in combination with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was effective in the management of most patients. Diagnosis and treatment of an underlying condition should be prioritized in refractory cases. If workup is negative, surgical management may be considered. Further investigation with a greater number of patients is required to develop management guidelines for PASH syndrome.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Antibacterianos , Hidradenite Supurativa , Pioderma Gangrenoso , Humanos , Pioderma Gangrenoso/diagnóstico , Pioderma Gangrenoso/terapia , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acne Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acne Vulgar/terapia , Acne Vulgar/complicações , Hidradenite Supurativa/diagnóstico , Hidradenite Supurativa/terapia , Hidradenite Supurativa/complicações , Adulto , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico
5.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 392, 2024 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878166

RESUMO

Steven Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), grouped together under the terminology of epidermal necrolysis (EN), are a spectrum of life-threatening dermatologic conditions. A lack of standardization and validation for existing endpoints has been identified as a key barrier to the comparison of these therapies and development of evidenced-based treatment. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of prospective studies involving systemic or topical treatments for EN, including dressing and ocular treatments. Outcomes were separated into mortality assessment, cutaneous outcomes, non-cutaneous clinical outcomes, and mucosal outcomes. The COSMIN Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instruments. Outcomes across studies assessing treatment in the acute phase of EN were varied. Most data came from prospective case reports and cohort studies representing the lack of available randomized clinical trial data available in EN. Our search did not reveal any EN-specific validated measures or scoring tools used to assess disease progression and outcomes. Less than half of included studies were considered "adequate" for COSMIN risk of bias in reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instruments. With little consensus about management and treatment of EN, consistency and validation of measured outcomes is of the upmost importance for future studies to compare outcomes across treatments and identify the most effective means of combating the disease with the highest mortality managed by dermatologists.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Humanos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/terapia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Bandagens
6.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(7): 419, 2024 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904763

RESUMO

High-frequency ultrasound has been used to visualize depth and vascularization of cutaneous neoplasms, but little has been synthesized as a review for a robust level of evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound in dermatology. A narrative review of the PubMed database was performed to establish the correlation between ultrasound findings and histopathologic/dermoscopic findings for cutaneous neoplasms. Articles were divided into the following four categories: melanocytic, keratinocytic/epidermal, appendageal, and soft tissue/neural neoplasms. Review of the literature revealed that ultrasound findings and histopathology findings were strongly correlated regarding the depth of a cutaneous neoplasm. Morphological characteristics were correlated primarily in soft tissue/neural neoplasms. Overall, there is a paucity of literature on the correlation between high-frequency ultrasound and histopathology of cutaneous neoplasms. Further studies are needed to investigate this correlation in various dermatologic conditions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Cutâneas , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Pele/diagnóstico por imagem , Pele/patologia , Dermoscopia/métodos , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patologia
9.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 279, 2024 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796524

RESUMO

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is classically considered a low-risk, self-limiting eruption lacking systemic manifestations and sparing facial and mucosal areas. We present 7 inpatients meeting diagnostic criteria for SDRIFE with concomitant systemic manifestations ± high-risk facial involvement acutely after antibiotic exposure (mean latency 6.71 days). These cases deviate from classic, self-limited SDRIFE and represent a unique phenotype of SDRIFE, characterized by coexisting extracutaneous manifestations. Onset of systemic stigmata coincided with or preceded cutaneous involvement in 4 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients developed peripheral eosinophilia and 6 patients had ≥ 2 extracutaneous systems involved. Facial involvement, a high-risk feature associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions but atypical in classic SDRIFE, occurred in 4 cases. Patients had favorable clinical outcomes following drug cessation and treatment with 4-6 week corticosteroid tapers. We suggest that baseline labs be considered in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-induced SDRIFE. These patients may also necessitate systemic therapy given extracutaneous involvement, deviating from standard SDRIFE treatment with drug cessation alone.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Toxidermias , Exantema , Fenótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Exantema/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Toxidermias/etiologia , Toxidermias/diagnóstico , Toxidermias/patologia , Idoso , Adulto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/induzido quimicamente
11.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(4)2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599660

RESUMO

With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.


Assuntos
Exantema , Oncologistas , Humanos , Consenso , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Radioimunoterapia
12.
Cutis ; 113(2): E28-E29, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593096

Assuntos
Hemorragia , Humanos
13.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(4): 98, 2024 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446235

RESUMO

Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum is an uncommon subtype of pyoderma gangrenosum mainly affecting stoma sites of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. While surgical treatments are often used to assist healing, little is known about the relationship between surgical interventions and the rate of recurrence of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. The aim of this study was to identify patient and clinical factors associated with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum recurrence following surgical intervention. A multi-institutional retrospective case series and literature review was conducted to evaluate patient characteristics and perioperative treatment. Patients of any age with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum undergoing surgical operations related to their pyoderma gangrenosum or due to another comorbidity were included. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographic information. Associations were evaluated using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Thirty-seven cases were included, 78.3% of which had a history of inflammatory bowel disease. Overall, 13 (35.1%) cases experienced recurrence at 30 days. There was no significant association identified between patient demographics, stoma location, surgical intervention, or perioperative treatment with rate of recurrence at 30 days post-operation. While no clinical risk factors or treatments were associated with recurrence, our work underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to this disease to address gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and surgical components of treatment.


Assuntos
Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Pioderma Gangrenoso , Humanos , Pioderma Gangrenoso/etiologia , Pioderma Gangrenoso/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Fatores de Risco
14.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(4): 103, 2024 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485858

RESUMO

While time spent practicing inpatient dermatology has decreased since the 1990s, less is known about the current state of inpatient dermatology. We describe the distribution and frequency of inpatient dermatology encounters servicing the United States Medicare population between 2013 and 2019. Cross-sectional analysis of publicly available inpatient Medicare Part B claims data from 2013 to 2019 was conducted. Main outcomes and measures were characteristics and trends of dermatologists performing inpatient encounters. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 analysis. Trends were analyzed for linearity using Pearson correlation coefficient. 782 physicians met inclusion criteria for inclusion. Dermatologists were more often male (56.5%), possessing allopathic Medical Doctorate (MD) (86.3%), and in metropolitan settings (98.2%). However, proportion of female inpatient dermatologists increased significantly (37.9% to 46.2%). Across rural and metropolitan practices, number of inpatient physicians (2013: 356; 2019: 281) and number of medical centers in which dermatology encounters occurred (2013: 239; 2019: 157) decreased, more significantly in non-residency-associated institutions. Spatial analysis revealed wide regions lacking dermatologists meeting defined criteria. Limitations included the need for ten Medicare inpatient encounters for inclusion, counties without reported data. In conclusion, the number of dermatologists performing > 10 inpatient encounters per year is decreasing, and large variations exist in the number of U.S. inpatient dermatology visits.


Assuntos
Dermatologia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Medicare , Estudos Transversais , Pacientes Internados , Recursos Humanos
17.
Dermatol Clin ; 42(2): 329-338, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423691

RESUMO

Neutrophilic dermatoses (NDs) encompass a wide range of cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations, many of which impair quality of life (QoL) and are difficult to treat. Although NDs are transient and mild, others are chronic, severely debilitating conditions with profound impacts on QoL, including pain, mental health, occupational limitations, and sexual health implications. Current literature lacks attention to these unique care challenges to the ND patient population. The authors aim to summarize what is currently known about QoL in NDs and identify which diseases would benefit from additional research and disease-specific QoL assessment.


Assuntos
Pioderma Gangrenoso , Síndrome de Sweet , Humanos , Pioderma Gangrenoso/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Neutrófilos , Pele
18.
NPJ Breast Cancer ; 10(1): 12, 2024 Jan 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297009

RESUMO

Hyperglycemia and rash are expected but challenging adverse events of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibition (such as with alpelisib). Two modified Delphi panels were conducted to provide consensus recommendations for managing hyperglycemia and rash in patients taking alpelisib. Experts rated the appropriateness of interventions on a 1-to-9 scale; median scores and dispersion were used to classify the levels of agreement. Per the hyperglycemia panel, it is appropriate to start alpelisib in patients with HbA1c 6.5% (diabetes) to <8%, or at highest risk for developing hyperglycemia, if they have a pre-treatment endocrinology consult. Recommend prophylactic metformin in patients with baseline HbA1c 5.7% to 6.4%. Metformin is the preferred first-line anti-hyperglycemic agent. Per the rash panel, initiate prophylactic nonsedating H1 antihistamines in patients starting alpelisib. Nonsedating H1 antihistamines and topical steroids are the preferred initial management for rash. In addition to clinical trial evidence, these recommendations will help address gaps encountered in clinical practice.

19.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(5): 911-926, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516356

RESUMO

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos , Eosinofilia , Humanos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/etiologia , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/terapia , Eosinofilia/induzido quimicamente , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/terapia , Pele , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Febre
20.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 90(5): 885-908, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516359

RESUMO

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos , Eosinofilia , Humanos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/etiologia , Eosinofilia/epidemiologia , Eosinofilia/induzido quimicamente , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Pele , Prognóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...