Herbivory by European Earwigs (Forficula auricularia; Dermaptera: Forficulidae) on Citrus Species Commonly Cultivated in California.

Agricultural plant species differ in susceptibility to herbivores; therefore, identifying natural resistances or tolerances to pests can be leveraged to develop preventative, integrated pest management approaches. While many Citrus species are grown in California, most pest management guidelines are based upon research conducted on navel oranges [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck; Sapindales: Rutaceae]. A recent study has established European earwigs (Forficula auricularia L.; Dermaptera: Forficulidae) as herbivores of young navel orange fruit, causing damage ranging from small bite marks to large chewed holes. It is unknown whether earwigs damage fruit of other citrus species. We conducted field experiments in which we caged earwigs to branch terminals bearing young fruit to explore potential differences in susceptibility of Citrus species to European earwigs. Specifically, we tested whether three species, navel oranges, clementines (C. clementina hort. ex Tanaka), and true mandarins (C. reticulata Blanco) exhibit differences in: 1) feeding deterrence to earwigs; 2) suitability as food for earwigs; 3) preferential abscission of damaged fruit; and 4) healing of damaged fruit. Earwigs caused heavy damage on navel orange and clementine fruit, whereas heavy damage was rare on true mandarin fruit. There was little evidence of preferential abscission of damaged fruit or healing of seriously damaged fruit. Consequently, several heavily damaged navel orange and one clementine fruit were retained to harvest and developed large scars. Overall, we found that Citrus fruit vary in their susceptibility to earwigs, and pest management strategies for earwigs should be refined to consider their varying effects on different Citrus species.

A meta-analysis of single visit pollination effectiveness comparing honeybees and other floral visitors.

PREMISE: Many animals provide ecosystem services in the form of pollination including honeybees, which have become globally dominant floral visitors. A rich literature documents considerable variation in single visit pollination effectiveness, but this literature has yet to be extensively synthesized to address whether honeybees are effective pollinators. METHODS: We conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis of 168 studies and extracted 1564 single visit effectiveness (SVE) measures for 240 plant species. We paired SVE data with visitation frequency data for 69 of these studies. We used these data to ask three questions: (1) Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) and other floral visitors differ in their SVE? (2) To what extent do plant and pollinator attributes predict differences in SVE between honeybees and other visitors? (3) Is there a correlation between visitation frequency and SVE? RESULTS: Honeybees were significantly less effective than the most effective non-honeybee pollinators but were as effective as the average pollinator. The type of pollinator moderated these effects. Honeybees were less effective compared to the most effective and average bird and bee pollinators but were as effective as other taxa. Visitation frequency and SVE were positively correlated, but this trend was largely driven by data from communities where honeybees were absent. CONCLUSIONS: Although high visitation frequencies make honeybees important pollinators, they were less effective than the average bee and rarely the most effective pollinator of the plants they visit. As such, honeybees may be imperfect substitutes for the loss of wild pollinators, and safeguarding pollination will benefit from conservation of non-honeybee taxa.

Characterizing Herbivory by European Earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) on Navel Orange Fruit with Comparison to Forktailed Bush Katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Herbivory.

In establishing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plans for understudied pests, it is crucial to understand the nature of their herbivory and resulting damage. European earwig (Forficula auricularia L.; Dermaptera: Forficulidae) densities are increasing in citrus orchards in Central California. Field observations suggest that earwigs feed on young, developing citrus fruit, but this hypothesis had not been examined with formal experimentation. Forktailed bush katydid nymphs (Scudderia furcata Brunner von Wattenwyl; Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) are well-known citrus herbivores that feed on young citrus fruit, and it is possible that earwig damage may be misdiagnosed as katydid damage. Here we report findings from two field experiments in navel oranges (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck; Sapindales: Rutaceae) that together tested: (1) whether earwigs damage young citrus fruit; (2) whether the amount of damage earwigs generate differs across developmental stage or sex of adult earwigs; (3) the window of time during which fruit are most sensitive to earwig damage; (4) whether damaged fruit are retained to harvest; and (5) the resulting damage morphology caused by earwigs relative to katydids. Earwigs, particularly nymphs, chewed deep holes in young citrus fruit from 0 to 3 wk after petal fall. Fruit damaged by earwigs were retained and exhibited scars at harvest. The morphology and distribution of scars on mature fruit only subtly differed between earwigs and katydids. This study establishes that earwigs can be direct pests in mature navel orange trees by generating scars on fruit and likely contribute to fruit quality downgrades.

Profile of Fork-Tailed Bush Katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Feeding on Fruit of Clementine Mandarins.

Sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck Sapindales: Rutaceae) dominated commercial citrus production in California until recently when there has been a shift to mandarins, mostly Citrus reticulata (Blanco) mandarins and Citrus clementina (hort. ex Tanaka) clementines. Past analyses of commercial field scouting and harvest data indicated that fork-tailed bush katydids (Scudderia furcata Brunner von Wattenwyl), a major pest in oranges, are present in clementine groves, but that fruit scarring attributed to katydids is rare. Conversely, jagged or web-like scarring attributed to caterpillars was more prevalent than expected. We used two field experiments in four representative cultivars of clementines to test four explanatory hypotheses for this observation: 1) katydids do not feed on clementine fruit, 2) damaged clementine fruit recover, 3) damaged clementine fruit preferentially abscise, and 4) katydid scars on clementine fruit have a different, undocumented morphology, not recognized as katydid damage. We find support for the latter two hypotheses. Katydids fed readily on the clementine fruit of all cultivars tested, chewing irregular holes that developed into jagged or web-like scars of a range of shapes and often led to splitting and abscission of maturing fruit. The katydid scars often more closely resembled chewing caterpillar damage than the round katydid scars in oranges, suggesting that katydid damage is being misclassified in clementines. The resistance documented in some other mandarins was not observed. Katydids are clearly a frugivorous pest causing previously unrecognized scarring in clementines.

Variation in pesticide use across crops in California agriculture: Economic and ecological drivers.

Pesticide use is a key component of efficient crop production, but is associated with a suite of costs. Understanding the main drivers of pesticide use will help us target research to develop effective alternatives. Although economic models predict, and empirical tests confirm, that the value of the crop being protected is an important determinant of between-crop variation in pesticide use, previous tests of this prediction have examined only modest numbers of crops and have not assessed the relative importance of crop value versus ecological determinants of pesticide use. Here we analyze variation in pesticide use across 93 crops grown in California, USA. We examine the joint roles of crop value and ecological determinants of pesticide use, including (i) the number of pest species associated with each crop; (ii) the distinction between annual vs. perennial crops; and (iii) the distinction between unprocessed vs. processed crops. As predicted, crop value was the dominant driver of the use of pesticides directed at arthropods and at plant pathogens, explaining 52.7% and 54.6% of total deviance, respectively. Ecological determinants of pesticide use were, however, also detected. Pesticide use was greater on crops that hosted a larger number of arthropod pest species (r = 0.32) or plant pathogen species (r = 0.29); for these pest groups, we saw no differences in pesticide use between annual vs. perennial crops, or processed vs. unprocessed crops. Perhaps surprisingly, crop value failed to explain the substantial between-crop variation in use of pesticides targeting weeds (1.7% of deviance explained, n.s.). Instead, an ecological factor, whether the crop was an annual versus a perennial plant, was the most important predictor of pesticide use against weeds, with more frequent applications on perennial crops. We conclude that both economic and ecological drivers influence the magnitude of potential crop losses, thereby shaping farmer pest control practices.

Differential Impacts of Citrus Thrips Across Sweet Orange and Mandarin Species.

Several domesticated Citrus species are grown as major commercial crops in California. Despite this, farmers currently use a single set of management practices, originally created for sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck [Sapindales: Rutaceae]), for both sweet oranges and all mandarin species. Mandarins, primarily Citrus reticulata Blanco, Citrus clementina hort. ex Tanaka, and Citrus unshiu Marcovitch, comprise almost 25% of California citrus acreage, and little work has been done to assess host-pest interactions for these species. Citrus thrips (Scirtothripscitri Moulton [Thysanoptera: Thripidae]) are one of the main pests in California citrus and are major targets for early spring, "petal fall" insecticide applications. We used mixed species citrus blocks to test the influence of Citrus species, including C. sinensis, C. reticulata, C. clementina, and C. unshiu, on 1) citrus thrips densities following petal fall; 2) citrus thrips-induced scarring on both the calyx and stylar ends of fruit; and 3) fruit deformation. Citrus sinensis and C. unshiu had relatively high citrus thrips densities and scarring levels, whereas C. reticulata had lower densities of citrus thrips and scarring levels. The age structure of citrus thrips populations also varied across Citrus species. Fruit deformity associated with citrus thrips scarring was found on all Citrus species examined. Scarring on the stylar-end of fruit, a previously largely ignored location of citrus thrips scarring, was found to be common in C. reticulata. It is clear from our work that species-specific management guidelines for citrus thrips are needed in sweet oranges and mandarins.