The Association of Race With Adequate Lymph Node Evaluation for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: National studies have reported racial and socioeconomic disparities in gastric cancer (GC) care. The current study evaluated adequate lymph node (LN) assessment (≥16 LNs) during resection for GC within a healthcare system servicing a socioeconomically disparate, mostly non-White population in the Southeast United States. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing resection for GC between 2003-2019 was performed. Factors associated with adequate LN assessment including patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 202 patients, adequate LN assessment was performed in 97 (48%) patients. On univariable analysis, younger age, non-White race, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Medicaid or no insurance, D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy, clinical evidence of regional LN metastases, total gastrectomy, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy were associated with adequate LN assessment. On multivariable analysis, non-White race (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.38-5.65), CCI <4 (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.15-3.96), and D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.96-6.74) were the only factors independently associated with adequate LN evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, non-White race, independent of socioeconomics, was significantly associated with adequate LN assessment. Future work is necessary to improve standardization and achieve higher rates of adequate LN assessment for all patients during resection for GC.

Comprehensive Comparison of Right and Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerves in the Tracheoesophageal Groove.

OBJECTIVE: A left-sided cervical approach to esophageal mobilization is considered safer given the perceived oblique path and more lateral orientation of the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) in the tracheoesophageal groove. Given the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve, the current study investigated if there are differences in right and left RLN location in the tracheoesophageal groove. METHODS: Right and left RLNs were carefully exposed in human cadavers. Comparison of location was determined at tracheal rings 2, 4, and 6 using 3 parameters: depth of the RLN from the anterior margin of the tracheal ring, lateral distance of the RLN from the posterior margin of the tracheal ring, and distance of the RLN to the anterior midline trachea following the curvature of the trachea. Statistical analysis was used to determine differences between the right and left sides. RESULTS: Compared with the right RLN, the left RLN was slightly over 1 mm deeper at the second tracheal ring. Despite this trend, there was no significant difference in RLN location between individual sides or as an aggregate for any of the 3 parameters at tracheal rings 2, 4, or 6. CONCLUSIONS: Careful characterization of RLN location precludes avoiding hoarseness, aphonia, and vocal cord paralysis. Counter to common surgical perception and educational beliefs, this study demonstrated that right and left RLN anatomical courses do not significantly differ along the trachea. Therefore, ensnarement on either side during a blind mobilization of the cervical esophagus is equally likely to occur.