Laparoscopic completion gastrectomy in elderly patients with remnant gastric cancer: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Open completion gastrectomy (OCG) has been selected to treat remnant gastric cancer (RGC) due to severe adhesions and difficulty recognizing anatomical orientation after primary gastrectomy. In general, elderly individuals' physiological reserves gradually decrease. Moreover, elderly patients (EPs) often have multiple complicating factors (i.e., frailty and comorbidities), leading to more postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. Recently, several trials revealed the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for EPs with gastric cancer in early recovery. However, there are limited studies investigating the use of laparoscopic completion gastrectomy (LCG) for RGC in EPs. This study aims to assess the efficacy of LCG in EPs aged ≥ 70 years. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of LCG with those of OCG. CASE PRESENTATION: Twenty-one EPs who underwent completion gastrectomy for RGC between 2007 and 2017 were enrolled and classified into two groups according to the surgical approach, namely the LCG (n = 6) and OCG (n = 15) groups. We adopted the G8 geriatric screening tool to comprehensively evaluate the EPs' physical, mental, and social functions. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and survival were retrospectively reviewed and compared between groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the preoperative modified G8, indicating that the EPs' backgrounds between the groups were comparable. Of note, blood loss during surgery was significantly reduced in the LCG group [median (range); LCG, 50 ml (20.0-65.0); OCG, 465 ml (264.5-714.0); p = 0.002]. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes in the LCG and OCG groups were 7 (range 4-10) versus 3 (range 1-6), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospitalization, intake of solid food, and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications. In patients with a history of gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the LCG group, operative time tended to be longer in patients who underwent D2 lymph node dissection as primary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: LCG was comparable to OCG for the treatment of RGC in EPs with significantly reduced blood loss. While LCG should be selected with caution in patients who have undergone D2 lymph node dissection as primary surgery, it could be considered as a surgical procedure in EPs with RGC.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of remnant gastric cancer is increasing because of past use of subtotal gastrectomy to treat peptic ulcer and increased survival rates after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The feasibility and advantages of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and clinical short-term outcomes of LTG for remnant gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer between April 2007 and October 2017 were divided into two groups: the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group and the LTG group. Clinicopathological data and short-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 31 remnant gastrectomies (23 OTG, 8 LTG) were performed. Blood loss was significantly lower in the LTG group than in the OTG group (135.5 vs 568.3 mL, P = 0.013). However, there was no significant difference in the operation time, days to food intake, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications, number of retrieved lymph nodes, or pathological findings. Two LTG patients (25.0%) required conversion to open surgery. There was no mortality in either group. CONCLUSIONS: LTG for remnant gastric cancer can be a safe treatment option and may have an advantage of less blood loss than OTG.

A Rare Surgical Case of Giant Jejunal Artery Aneurysm in a Young Patient.

Aneurysms of the abdominal visceral arteries are infrequently encountered. Jejunal artery aneurysm (JAA) is one of the rarest visceral aneurysms, especially in young patients. Endovascular surgery tends to be an effective treatment for visceral artery aneurysms. Here, we report a case of symptomatic JAA with a peripheral dilated vessel in a young patient. However, in consideration of the patient's anatomic suitability and young age, we chose open surgical intervention with intraoperative angiography. Thus, we could resect the aneurysm and the peripheral dilated vessel, preserve the bowel, and leave no devices that could cause further complication. The choice of the most appropriate treatment should depend on aneurysm characteristics and the background of the patient.

[Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with CyberKnife®for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer].

For treatment of colorectal liver metastases, liver resection is recommended for resectable cases in the clinical guidelines for colorectal cancer. On the other hand, there are currently no data supporting the efficacy of radiation therapy as a topical treatment, and this treatment can therefore not presently be recommended. With CyberKnife®, it is possible to perform stereotactic radiation therapy using a linear accelerator with high accuracy, even for lesions in the trunk area such as liver metastases. Between December 2009 and September 2014 in our hospital, we performed radiation treatment using CyberKnife® for 14 cases with 22 colorectal liver metastases. As a result, we obtained response and local control rates of 76.2%and 81.0%, respectively. Moreover, no advanced adverse events were observed. Thus, we consider that CyberKnife® treatment for colorectal liver metastases is effective as a topical treatment, with low invasiveness and high safety.