Effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy in atherosclerotic disease: comparing the ASA low-response prevalence in CVD, CAD and PAD.

Although acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) reduces the risk of ischemic events in patients with atherosclerosis, a substantial number of incidents continue to occur. As only limited data exist we evaluated the antiplatelet effectiveness of ASA in patients with different manifestations of atherosclerosis as in cerebrovascular, coronary artery and peripheral arterial disease (CVD, CAD, PAD). For the evaluation of the antiplatelet effectiveness of ASA we used whole blood aggregometry (Chrono-log Model 590). The patients in the different subgroups received ASA 100, 200 or 500 mg daily. We analysed 737 consecutive patients: 47.5 % with CVD, 33.6 % with CAD, and 18.9 % with PAD. We identified 28.0 % of the CVD, 18.1 % of the CAD and 21.6 % of the PAD patients to be ASA low-responder (ALR). Comparing subgroups treated with 100 mg ASA, 36.4 % were ALR in the CVD group as were 13.1 % of the CAD and 21.6 % of the PAD patients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed an odds ratio for being ALR of 4.50 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.70-11.9) when 100 mg and of 2.97 (95 % CI 1.58-5.60) when 200 mg ASA was taken compared to a dose of 500 mg. Despite the proven benefits of antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease, current antiplatelet management is suboptimal as up to 36 % of patients failed to achieve an adequate platelet inhibitory effect. Our findings may explain, at least in part, the high rates of cardiovascular events observed in the course of atherothrombotic disease and support the need to improve antiplatelet therapy.

Cytochrome P450 2B6 and 2C9 genotype polymorphism--a possible cause of prasugrel low responsiveness.

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes are essential for the metabolic activation of the prodrug prasugrel. Little is known about the impact of polymorphism of these isoenzymes on the prevalence of prasugrel low responsiveness (PLR) in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the frequency of PLR and the question whether PLR is associated with decreased/non-function polymorphisms of the CYP isoenzymes (2C9*2, 2C9*3, 2C19*2, 2C19*3, and 2B6*6). Our study included 355 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary stenting. The patients were initially treated with either prasugrel (n=90; 60/10 mg: loading/daily maintenance dose) or 600/75 mg clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (n=265) in combination with 500/100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Platelet function was tested by impedance aggregometry 48 hours after taking the loading dose. Prasugrel achieved on the average significantly higher levels of platelet inhibition as compared to clopidogrel (mean 27.3 U vs 41.2 U). The frequencies of low response for prasugrel, clopidogrel and ASA were 9.8%, 35.1% and 14.9%, respectively. We identified only body mass index to be associated with PLR. PLR was not caused by a loss of ADP P2Y12-receptor function. Half of the patients with PLR were carriers of the reduced-function allele CYP2B6*6, and 41.7% had the genetic variant CYP2C9*2. The allele CYP2C9*3 was detected in three patients with PLR (25%) and two patients with PLR (16.7%) carried the gene variant CYP2C19*2. In conclusion, the rate of low responders was significantly lower among patients treated with prasugrel than with clopidogrel. PLR are more often carriers of CYP2C9*2 (50% in PLR) than when compared to the prevalence described in literature. Also, there is a trend to an increased frequency of CYP2B6*6 in PLR. In conclusion, CYP2B6 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms seem to be associated with prasugrel low-response.

BAPA, a synthetic dual inhibitor of Factor Xa and Thrombin, extends the storage-time to a maximum of 12 hours in ADP- and 24 hours in arachidonic acid-induced impedance aggregometry.

Impedance aggregometry is mainly limited by the time-dependent instability of platelets in whole blood samples, caused by the influence of ex-vivo anticoagulants. The synthesis of a new anticoagulant, Benzylsulfonyl-D-Arg-Pro-4-amidinobenzylamide (BAPA), has recently been introduced. Data from recent studies suggest stable results for up to 32 h. In view of this data we were interested in the results of ADP- and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced measurements after a prolonged storage time depending on the use of citrate or BAPA. Blood samples from 24 healthy individuals were anticoagulated with either citrate or BAPA. ADP- and AA-induced measurements were carried out between 2 h and up to 48 h after blood samples were taken. Results of ADP-induced measurements remained stable for 8 h in citrated and for a maximum of 12 h in BAPA-anticoagulated samples. AA-induced measurements yielded stable results up to 12 h in citrated and up to 24 h in BAPA anticoagulated blood. These data demonstrate that the storage time for whole blood impedance aggregometry can be prolonged when BAPA is used as an anticoagulant. However, in contrast to previous studies implicating considerably longer potential storage times we could not see a clear overall purpose in using BAPA. Further studies including blood samples of patients and the comparison of BAPA to other anticoagulants are necessary to define the potential role of BAPA anticoagulated samples.

Tailored antiplatelet therapy can overcome clopidogrel and aspirin resistance--the BOchum CLopidogrel and Aspirin Plan (BOCLA-Plan) to improve antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy using acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) and clopidogrel is of great importance following coronary stenting. However, the variable platelet inhibitory effectiveness compromises the antithrombotic advantages provided by dual antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this single-center prospective study was to reduce the low response incidence of dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and clopidogrel according to a prespecified therapy algorithm. METHODS: Platelet function testing using whole blood aggregometry (Chronolog 590) was performed 48 hours following coronary stenting (for either acute coronary syndromes or stable coronary artery disease) on 504 patients. The antiplatelet therapy included a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel and 500 mg ASA, followed by 75 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg ASA once daily. Clopidogrel low responders (CLR: >5 ohm; adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 5 µM) and/or ASA low responders (ALR: >0 ohm; arachidonic acid 10 µM) were treated according to a structured therapy plan: in the case of CLR, the maintenance + dose was doubled (repeated loading dose followed by 150 mg daily), and when still ineffective ticlopidine or prasugrel, if available and not contraindicated, were used. ALR was treated by increasing the dose to 300 mg in a first step or to 500 mg ASA when the first modification did not take effect sufficiently. In addition, ADP receptor antagonist 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-monophosphate triethylammonium salt (MeSAMP) testing and ASA incubation were performed to rule out either a platelet ADP-receptor defect or an ASA pharmacokinetic resistance. RESULTS: Of the total cohort of 504 patients, we detected 30.8% clopidogrel low-responders and 19.4% aspirin low-responders. For ALR, with a dose adjustment of 300 mg ASA daily, 94.6% of ALR were effectively treated and the residual 5.4% by administration of daily dosages of 500 mg ASA. This means that after modification of the ASA maintenance dose, all initial ALRs had an adequate antiplatelet response. The results for clopidogrel revealed that 69% of the CLR were treated effectively by increasing the clopidogrel dose to 150 mg daily. When prasugrel was not available or contraindicated, 12.7% of the remaining low responders showed an adequate result after being switched to ticlopidine. Consequently, by applying the therapy algorithm, we were able to reduce the CLR prevalence by 86.6%. On including prasugrel in the therapy plan, we were finally able to eliminate thienopyridine low response. In addition, no ADP receptor defect was found in this study as a potential reason for CLR. We identified the following factors associated with both CLR and ALR status: acute coronary syndromes, positive troponin values as well as diabetes mellitus and elevated HbA1C values and a higher platelet count. Furthermore, our data revealed for CLR elevated C-reactive protein values and a high PREDICT-score (including an age >65 years, acute coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, and reduced left ventricular function) as risk factors. The following factors correlated with the risk of ASA low response: patients with elevated hemoglobin, serum creatinine and C-reactive protein values. In addition, medication with nitrates reduced the risk of being CLR. As also holds true for CLR, we found the PREDICT-score to be correlated to the risk of being ALR. However, by far the strongest risk factor for CLR or ALR was the fact of dual resistance. CONCLUSION: Following a structured therapy plan based on a "test and treat" strategy, the prevalence of clopidogrel or aspirin low response can be significantly reduced and the risk of inadequate dual antiplatelet therapy minimized.