Descriptive Study of Patients Treated in a Psychosomatic Internal Medicine Declared by Japanese Family Medicine Clinic.

Background: Psychosomatic internal medicine (PSIM) assesses psychosocial factors and provides holistic consideration. In Japan, PSIM physicians seem to be recognized as providers of mental health services, but family medicine did not so. When family physicians confront with psychological problems, high dropout rate is reported so it is needed to reveal factors related to dropouts, The purpose of this study is to describe characteristics of patients, treatment dropouts and its related factors in PSIM practice by family physician. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the medical records of the Kitaibaraki Center of Family Medicine located in Kitaibaraki City, Ibaraki, Japan. The study included all new patients who made an appointment and visited the PSIM in this clinic from January 2020 to December 2022.Chief complaints and diagnoses were coded based on the International Classification of Primary Care, version 2 (ICPC-2). Results: In total, 377 new patients were included in this study. The mean age was 39.9 ± 20.2 years. We found that 69.2% of patients who visited the clinic had a psychological chief complaint and 84.1% of primary diagnoses consisted of a psychological problem. One hundred sixty-five patients (43.8%) were still receiving treatment 6 months after the initial visit. Of the patients who ended treatment within 6 months after the initial visit, 84 patients (39.2%) dropped out. In multivariate analysis, the dropouts were less likely to occur patients with primary diagnosis of psychological problem (odds ratio (OR): 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19 - 0.67). Conclusions: Patients who visited a PSIM wanted consultation about psychological problems. Patients with a diagnosis of a psychological problem at the initial visit were less likely to drop out.

COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness and Associated Factors in Japanese Primary Care Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 vaccination is important to stop the pandemic. It has been reported that willingness to be vaccinated is associated with system factors as well as individual attitudes and beliefs. Primary care patients include individuals at increased risk of poor outcomes after COVID-19 infection, such as elderly people and those with comorbidities. This study investigated attitudes in this population toward COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination, including willingness to be vaccinated and associated factors. This study was conducted in Japan, where the population has low vaccine confidence, during the initial phase of COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: Patients from 1 primary care clinic in Kitaibaraki City, Ibaraki, Japan, participated in this study from March to April 2021. They were administered a self-reported questionnaire exploring factors such as willingness to undergo COVID-19 vaccination, perceived susceptibility, and perceived vaccine efficacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 717 patients (response rate, 88.3%), 512 (70.0%) reported they were willing to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Multivariate analysis revealed that vaccination willingness was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), male gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.30), influenza vaccination in in the 2020/2021 season (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.49-4.32), recommendation from others (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.58-6.18), high perceived susceptibility (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.45-4.33), belief in vaccine efficacy (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.54-9.56), high perceived susceptibility to vaccine-related adverse events (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.64), and high espousal of social norms (OR 8.00, 95% CI 2.78-23.0). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination was widely acceptable to Japanese primary care patients. In addition to factors such as vaccine efficacy, and past influenza vaccination, social norms may be important in determining COVID-19 vaccination willingness.

What Affected Primary Care Patients' Decisions to Receive the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in the 2020 to 2021 Season?

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: A primary care patient's decision to undergo seasonal influenza vaccination may have been different during the global COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 to 2021 season. The purpose of this study is to investigate what affected primary care patients' decisions to undergo seasonal influenza vaccination in the 2020 to 2021 season. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a primary care clinic in Ibaraki, Japan. We used a purposive sampling strategy to reach individuals aged 20 years or older who underwent influenza vaccination. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients completed the interview. Two main themes emerged: the desire to avoid risks to one's health and being a part a community in coexistence with others. The first theme included desire to avoid influenza and expectations that vaccination will prevent severe disease. The second theme included concerns about the consequences of one's own influenza infection on others in the community and necessity of vaccination based on the surroundings and others. CONCLUSIONS: Raising awareness of risk factors such as older age and comorbidities, and the expectations of community members might be effective in promoting influenza vaccination.

Factors associated with influenza vaccination in Japanese elderly outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients benefit from influenza vaccination, but the number of Japanese elderly patients who are vaccinated is insufficient. Several factors are associated with influenza vaccination acceptance, but little is known about Japanese elderly outpatients. The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with influenza vaccination in elderly outpatients in Japan. METHODS: During the 2017-2018 influenza season, outpatients from one hospital and one clinic in Kitaibaraki City, Ibaraki, Japan, participated in this study. Patients answered a self-report questionnaire exploring factors such as their vaccination status during the 2017-2018 season, past influenza vaccination, perceived susceptibility to influenza and adverse events of the vaccine, perceived vaccine efficacy, physician recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with vaccination. RESULTS: Of 377 patients, 316 (83.8%) responded, and the vaccination rate was 57%. Eighty-three patients (27.0%) reported that their physician recommended the influenza vaccine. In multivariate analysis, influenza vaccination was associated with higher age (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.14), physician recommendations (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.18-5.25), low perceived susceptibility to vaccine-related adverse events (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.74), and belief in vaccine efficacy (OR 4.73, 95% CI 2.08-10.8). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination was associated with belief in vaccine efficacy, perceived susceptibility to vaccine-related adverse events, physician recommendations, and older age. Increasing the frequency of physician recommendations may lead to increased vaccination coverage.

Central Nervous System Lymphoma Harboring the JAK2 V617F Mutation That Developed after a 20-year History of Polycythemia Vera.

A 78-year-old man who had a 20-year history of polycythemia vera (PV) with a JAK2 V617F mutation presented with gradually progressive disturbance of consciousness. Hyper-intense lesions in the peri-lateral ventricular area and left cerebellar hemisphere were observed by T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging. Cytologic and genetic analyses of the lymphoma cells obtained from his cerebrospinal fluid established the diagnosis of B-cell lymphoma. No lesions outside of the brain were recognized. Because of his poor general condition, he was not treated actively. A postmortem analysis revealed a JAK2 V617F mutation in the lymphoma cells, suggesting their origin was a PV clone.

Does a child's fear of needles decrease through a learning event with needles?

BACKGROUND: Most children have a fear of needles. Suitable preparation can decrease the pain and fear of needles in hospitals; however, few have examined how such preparation affects healthy children. This study examined whether learning with needles decreases fear of needles and changes motivation to get vaccinations in school-age children and the possible association between fear of needles and motivation toward vaccinations. METHODS: This study included children participating in the "Let's Be Doctors" event, which was held in 4 child centers in Tsukuba city, Ibaraki, Japan. In this event, children learned about injections and how a vaccine works, and injected a vaccine (water) into skin (sponge) using a real syringe and imitation needle. Data were collected just before and after the event by anonymous self-assessment questionnaires that used a 4-point Likert scale to assess fear of needles, motivation to get vaccinations, recommendation of vaccinations, and fear toward doctors among the children. Answers were divided into two categories for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 194 children participated in the event and 191 children answered the questionnaire (response rate 98.5%). We analyzed 180 subjects, comprising 79 boys (43.9%) and 94 girls (52.2%), mean age of 8.1 ± 1.0 years. The number of children reporting a fear of needles decreased from 69 (38.3%) before the event to 51 (28.3%) after the event, and those unwilling to get vaccinations decreased from 48 (26.7%) to 27 (15.0%). Children who reported fear of needles before the event were more unwilling to get vaccinations than those with no fear of needles (36 [52.2%] vs. 12 [10.8%]), while after the event the number of needle-fearing children unwilling to get vaccinations decreased to 19 (27.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Children's fear of needles and unwillingness to get vaccinations were decreased after experiencing a learning event with needles. The fear of needles is associated with a negative motivation to get vaccinations in children.