Severe acute liver disease in adults: Contemporary role of histopathology.

Liver biopsies have consistently contributed to our understanding of the pathogenesis and aetiologies of acute liver disease. As other diagnostic modalities have been developed and refined, the role of biopsy in the management of patients with acute liver failure (ALF), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and acute hepatitis, including acute liver injury (ALI), has changed. Liver biopsy remains particularly valuable when first-line diagnostic algorithms fail to determine aetiology. Despite not being identified as a mandatory diagnostic tool in recent clinical guidelines for the management of ALF or ACLF, many centres continue to undertake biopsies given the relative safety of transjugular biopsy in this setting. Several studies have demonstrated that liver biopsy can provide prognostic information, particularly in the context of so-called indeterminate hepatitis, and is extremely useful in excluding conditions such as metastatic tumours that would preclude transplantation. In addition, its widespread use of percutaneous biopsies in cases of less severe acute liver injury, for example in the establishment of a diagnosis of acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis or confirmation of a probable or definite drug-induced liver injury (DILI), has meant that many centres have seen a shift in the ratio of specimens they are receiving from patients with chronic to acute liver disease. Histopathologists therefore need to be equipped to deal with these challenging specimens. This overview provides an insight into the contemporary role of biopsies (as well as explant and autopsy material) in diagnosing acute liver disease. It outlines up-to-date clinical definitions of liver injury and considers recent recommendations for the diagnosis of AIH and drug-induced, autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-AIH).

Hepatic Precancerous Lesions and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

This review discusses the diagnostic challenges of diagnosing and treating precursor lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. The distinction of high-grade dysplastic nodule (the primary precursor lesion in cirrhotic liver) from early HCC is emphasized based on morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genomic features. The risk factors associated with HCC in hepatocellular adenomas (precursor lesion in non-cirrhotic liver) are delineated, and the risk in different subtypes is discussed with emphasis on terminology, diagnosis, and genomic features.

Assessment of large droplet fat in frozen sections of donor liver biopsies: utility and interobserver variability of the newly described Banff method compared to a simplified Average of Fields method.

AIMS: There is great variability in the assessment and reporting of fat in frozen sections of donor liver biopsies. The Banff Working Group has proposed a novel method and definition for scoring large droplet fat (LDF) in donor liver biopsies. This study compares the Banff method with a simpler Average of Fields (AF) method and evaluates the impact of different LDF definitions. METHODS: Three pathologists assessed percentage of LDF (LDF%) in 10 donor liver biopsies using Banff and AF methods, applying the Banff LDF definition (cell distention with a single droplet larger than adjacent hepatocytes). Additionally, LDF% by the AF method was compared using two LDF definitions: Banff definition versus LDF definition 2 (single fat droplet occupying greater than half of a hepatocyte with nuclear displacement). RESULTS: Intraobserver concordance between the Banff and AF methods was similar for all three pathologists (kappa 0.76-1). Both methods exhibited 70% interobserver concordance, and there was substantial agreement (kappa 0.68) in the LDF% among the three pathologists for both methods. Comparing the two LDF definitions, results were significantly lower with the Banff definition; LDF >50% was observed in four cases with LDF definition 2 but none of the cases with the Banff definition. CONCLUSIONS: There is high interobserver and intraobserver concordance of LDF% between the Banff and AF methods. LDF% determined by the Banff definition was lower than with LDF definition 2, and needs to be validated based on graft outcome before it can be recommended for clinical use.

Clinical Data Do Not Reliably Predict Duodenal Histology at Follow-up in Celiac Disease: A 13 Center Correlative Study.

Validated nonbiopsy methods to assure duodenal mucosal healing in celiac disease are lacking, yet ongoing mucosal injury is associated with anemia, osteoporosis, and lymphoma. Most providers utilize clinical data as surrogates of mucosal status to avoid additional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The reliability of such surrogates to predict mucosal recovery has been incompletely evaluated. The aim of this study was to rigorously assess patterns of histologic mucosal recovery at follow-up in celiac disease and to correlate findings with clinical data. Gastrointestinal pathologists from 13 centers evaluated initial and follow-up duodenal biopsies from 181 celiac disease patients. Marsh scores and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs)/100 enterocytes were assessed blindly. Histology at follow-up was correlated with symptoms, immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase titers and gluten-free diet adherence. Fifty-six/181 (31%) patients had persistent villous blunting and 46/181 (25%) patients had just persistently elevated IELs at follow-up, with only 79/181 (44%) patients having complete histologic remission. IEL normalization (82/181; 45%) lagged villous recovery (125/181;69%). In a minority of patients, villous blunting was limited to proximal duodenal biopsies. No correlation was found between Marsh scores and symptoms, normalization of immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase serology, or diet adherence. Children showed greater recovery of Marsh score ( P <0.001) and IELs ( P <0.01) than adults. Persistent mucosal injury is common in celiac disease, with discordant villous/IEL normalization. Pathologist awareness of expected findings in celiac disease follow-up biopsies, including their frequent lack of correlation with clinical data, is important for patient management, and has implications for eligibility criteria for therapeutics currently in development.

Focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules arising in the setting of hepatic vascular disorders with portosystemic shunting show ß-catenin activation.

Hepatocellular nodules can develop in the setting of chronic hepatic vascular disorders including those characterized by portosystemic shunts such as Abernethy malformation and post-Fontan procedure. The nodules can range from benign lesions such as regenerative nodules, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) to malignant neoplasms such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In many instances, these nodules are difficult to place into well-defined categories based on radiologic or histologic features. Nodular lesions that resemble FNH are common in this context and have been described as FNH-like nodules, the nature of which is not well-established. This study examines 6 liver resections from patients with vascular disease characterized by portosystemic shunts. A wide range of nodules were present in these cases, including regenerative nodules (n = 2), FNH and FNH-like (n = 30), HCA (n = 10), HCA-like (n = 13), and HCC (n = 2). Six nodules from 3 patients were categorized as FNH-like due to one or more features such as nodular architecture, fibrous septa, and ductular reaction, but lack of typical map-like glutamine synthetase (GS) staining. Further characterization of these 6 FNH-like nodules showed diffuse GS staining in all nodules (3 diffuse homogeneous, 3 diffuse heterogeneous). Targeted next-generation sequencing identified CTNNB1 alterations in all tested FNH-like nodules (n = 4). These results indicate that FNH-like nodules in the setting of chronic hepatic vascular disorders can be neoplastic. Since the presence of ß-catenin activation portends a potential risk for malignant progression, GS and ß-catenin immunohistochemistry should be obtained in all cases showing FNH-like morphology, with molecular analysis performed in cases with indeterminate staining pattern.

CRP Versus SAA for Identification of Inflammatory Hepatic Adenomas.

Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P -value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score ( P <0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score ( P <0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.

Genomic Analysis in the Categorization of Poorly Differentiated Primary Liver Carcinomas.

A subset of primary liver carcinomas (PLCs) cannot be classified as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) based on morphology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). This includes tumors with morphology suggestive of HCC but lacking hepatocellular marker expression, tumors with ambiguous morphology characterized by co-expression of hepatocellular and cholangiocytic markers, and undifferentiated pleomorphic carcinomas with no discernible line of differentiation on morphology or IHC. This study examines the role of genomic analysis in the categorization of these tumors. Genomic analysis was performed on 16 PLCs that could not be definitely classified as HCC or iCCA based on morphology and IHC using a capture-based next-generation sequencing assay (n=15) or single gene mutational analysis (n=1). Genomic alterations in TERT promoter were seen in 9/16 cases (56%) and strongly favored HCC. Genomic alterations favoring iCCA were seen in 5/16 cases (31%) and included mutations in IDH1 , PBRM1 , BAP1 , and ERBB2 , as well as FGFR2 fusion. Genomic changes were helpful in classifying 14/16 (87%) PLCs. Though not specific, these genomic alterations can provide valuable diagnostic clues in selected morphologically and immunohistochemically unclassifiable cases. Given the important differences in management between HCC and iCCA, routine use of genomic analysis in diagnostically challenging settings should be considered.

Evaluating Liver Biopsies with Well-Differentiated Hepatocellular Lesions.

Needle core biopsies of liver lesions can be challenging, particularly in cases with limited material. The differential diagnosis for well-differentiated hepatocellular lesions includes focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular adenoma, and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in noncirrhotic liver, while dysplastic nodules and well-differentiated HCC are the primary considerations in cirrhotic liver. The first part of this review focuses on histochemical and immunohistochemical stains as well as molecular assays that are useful in the differential diagnosis. The second portion describes the features of hepatocellular adenoma subtypes and focuses on the differential diagnoses in commonly encountered clinicopathologic scenarios.

Survival outcomes used to validate version 9 of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for appendiceal cancer.

The standard for cancer staging in the United States for all cancer sites, including primary carcinomas of the appendix, is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. AJCC staging criteria undergo periodic revisions, led by a panel of site-specific experts, to maintain contemporary staging definitions through the evaluation of new evidence. Since its last revision, the AJCC has restructured its processes to include prospectively collected data because large data sets have become increasingly robust and available over time. Thus survival analyses using AJCC eighth edition staging criteria were used to inform stage group revisions in the version 9 AJCC staging system, including appendiceal cancer. Although the current AJCC staging definitions were maintained for appendiceal cancer, incorporating survival analysis into the version 9 staging system provided unique insight into the clinical challenges in staging rare malignancies. This article highlights the critical clinical components of the now published version 9 AJCC staging system for appendix cancer, which (1) justified the separation of three different histologies (non-mucinous, mucinous, signet-ring cell) in terms of prognostic variance, (2) demonstrated the clinical implications and challenges in staging heterogeneous and rare tumors, and (3) emphasized the influence of data limitations on survival analysis for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.

Clinicopathologic characterization of hepatocellular adenomas in men: a multicenter experience.

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are benign liver neoplasms which most commonly present in women in their reproductive age. In men, they are rare and have a higher risk of malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here we present our multicenter experience with HCA in men in the United States. A total of 27 HCA cases were included, with a mean age of presentation of 37 years (range, 9-69 years) and a mean size of 6.8 cm (range, 0.9-18.5 cm). Based on the 2019 World Health Organization classification, the most common subtype identified was inflammatory HCA (IHCA; 10 cases, 37.0%) followed by unclassified HCA (UHCA; 7 cases, 25.9%), HNF1A-inactivated HCA (H-HCA; 6 cases, 22.2%), ß-catenin-activated IHCA (b-IHCA; 3 cases, 11.1%), and ß-catenin-activated HCA (b-HCA; 1 case, 3.7%). Six additional cases diagnosed as hepatocellular neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (HUMP) were also included in the study. These cases presented in a mean age of 46 years (range, 17-64 years) and a size of 10.8 cm (range, 4.2-16.5 cm). We evaluated the significance of androgen receptor (AR) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC); of the 16 cases with materials available, 8 were considered positive using the Allred score system (2 IHCA, 2 H-HCA, 1 UHCA, and 3 HUMP). Of the total cases, 12 were diagnosed on biopsies, for which follow-up information is available for 7, and none of them show evidence of malignant transformation. Of the 21 resection cases, a concomitant well-differentiated HCC within the same lesion was identified in 5 cases (23.8%), which were diagnosed as HCA (n = 4) or HUMP (n = 1). Overall, 15% of cases in our entire cohort of HCA and HUMP showed concomitant HCC, while none of the 7 biopsy cases showed any malignant transformation on follow-up (range, 22-160 months; mean, 61.8 months).

Integrated Genomic and Clinicopathologic Approach Distinguishes Pancreatic Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumor From Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Identifies a Subset With Molecular Overlap.

Distinguishing grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (G3 PanNET) from neuroendocrine carcinoma (PanNEC) is a known diagnostic challenge, and accurate classification is critical because clinical behavior and therapies differ. Although current recommendations suggest that immunohistochemistry for p53, Rb, ATRX, and DAXX can distinguish most cases, some cases remain difficult to classify using this approach. In this study, we reviewed 47 high-grade neoplasms originally diagnosed as pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. In addition to the currently recommended stains, we performed capture-based sequencing of approximately 500 cancer genes and immunohistochemistry for p16 and trypsin or chymotrypsin. Using an integrated molecular and clinicopathologic approach, 42 (89%) of 47 cases had a clear final diagnosis of either G3 PanNET (n = 17), PanNEC (n = 17), or mixed acinar-NEC (n = 8). The 17 G3 PanNETs demonstrated frequent alterations in MEN1 (71%), DAXX (47%), ATRX (24%), TSC2 (35%), SETD2 (42%), and CDKN2A (41%). Contrary to prior reports, TP53 alterations were also common in G3 PanNETs (35%) but were always mutually exclusive with CDKN2A alterations in this group. The 17 PanNECs demonstrated frequent alterations in TP53 (88%), cell cycle genes RB1 (47%), CCNE1/CCND1 (12%), CDKN2A (29%), and in KRAS (53%) and SMAD4 (41%); TP53 was coaltered with a cell cycle gene in 76% of PanNECs. Diffuse strong p16 staining was observed in 69% of PanNECs in contrast to 0% of G3 PanNETs. The 8 acinar-NECs had recurrent alterations in ATM (25%), APC (25%), and STK11 (25%). Five cases remained difficult to classify, 3 of which exhibited overlapping molecular features with alterations in MEN1 with or without ATRX, and RB1 with or without TP53, making it unclear whether to classify as PanNET or PanNEC. Our data demonstrate that molecular profiling and immunohistochemistry for p16 greatly improve the diagnostic accuracy of high-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and identify a subset of rare cases with overlapping features of both PanNET and PanNEC.

Staging of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: challenges and recent updates.

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are unique tumors of the appendix, characterized by low-grade mucinous epithelium with villiform, undulating, or flat architecture. These tumors lack infiltrative growth or destructive invasion, but can extend into the appendiceal wall by a "pushing" pattern of invasion, with a broad front that can mimic a diverticulum. These neoplasms have a propensity for peritoneal dissemination, resulting in the clinical presentation of pseudomyxoma peritonei. The pathologic staging of these neoplasms is challenging and fraught with confusing terminology and numerous classification systems. This review focuses on the AJCC pathologic staging of these tumors with a focus on challenging situations.

Influence of progestin-only hormonal use on hepatocellular adenomas: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Exogenous estrogen is associated with growth of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), although the influence of progestin-only agents is unknown. We therefore evaluated the association of progestin-only agents on HCA progression compared to no hormone exposure and compared to estrogen exposure in female patients. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study of reproductive-aged female patients (ages 16-45) with diagnosed HCAs between 2003 and 2021, we evaluated radiographic HCA growth during discrete periods of well-defined exogenous hormone exposures. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were included. Nineteen (55.9%) had follow-up scans during periods without hormone exposure, 7 (20.6%) during estrogen exposure, and 8 (23.5%) during progestin-only exposure. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, percent change in sum of adenoma diameters from baseline to last available scan was -15.0% with progestin-only agents versus 29.4% with estrogen exposure (p = 0.04), and -7.4% with no hormonal exposure (p = 0.52 compared to progestin-only). Greater than 10% growth was observed in two individuals (25.0%) with progestin-only agent use (one patient on high-dose progestin for menorrhagia) versus five individuals (71.4%) with estrogen use (p = 0.13), and 7 (36.8%) with no exogenous hormone use (p = 0.68 vs progestin-only). CONCLUSIONS: During discrete periods of progestin-only use, HCA growth overall declined, similar to declining growth during periods without exogenous hormonal exposure. This differed from discrete periods of exogenous estrogen exposure, during which time HCAs demonstrated overall increased growth. Though larger studies are needed, these findings support recent guidance supporting progestin-only agents for female patients with HCAs seeking non-estrogen alternatives for contraception. IMPLICATIONS: In this small retrospective study, we observed overall decrease in HCA size during discrete periods of progestin-only contraception use, similar to that observed during periods without exogenous hormone exposure, supporting their use as a safe alternative to estrogen-containing contraceptives in this patient population.

Hepatic Adenomas in Patients 60 and Older Are Enriched for HNF1A Inactivation and Malignant Transformation.

Hepatic adenomas occur most commonly in women between the ages of 20 and 40 years, but rarely they occur in older aged persons, including those 60 years of age or older. This group of adenomas, however, has not been systemically examined. Twenty-six hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older were studied, along with a control group of 50 hepatic adenomas in persons aged 30 to 39. Hepatic adenomas in persons 60 or more years of age were found in 21 women and 5 men, while the control group had 44 women and 6 men. Subtyping the adenomas in persons 60 years or older showed the following results: 18 HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (69%), 4 inflammatory adenomas (15%), and 4 unclassified adenomas (15%). In contrast, the control group showed a significantly different pattern (P=0.003), with a greater percentage of inflammatory adenomas (28, 56%), fewer HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (8, 16%), and more unclassified adenomas (14, 28%). Atypia and malignant transformation within the hepatic adenomas was studied next. Of the hepatic adenomas in persons age 60 or greater, 3 (12%) showed atypical histologic features, and 6 (23%) had a malignant transformation. In contrast, for hepatic adenomas in the control group, only 4 (8%) adenomas showed atypical histologic features, and 3 (6%) had undergone malignant transformation. In addition, the hepatic adenomas that were atypical or showed early malignant transformation were less likely to have beta-catenin activation in patients over 60 (2/9 cases) compared with those between 30 and 39 years (5/7 cases). Myxoid change and heavy lipofuscin deposition were also more common in adenomas in older aged persons. In conclusion, hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older are enriched for HNF1A-inactivated adenomas and have a higher frequency of malignant transformation. Malignant transformation, however, is less likely to develop through activation of the beta-catenin pathway.

Consensus recommendations for histological criteria of autoimmune hepatitis from the International AIH Pathology Group: Results of a workshop on AIH histology hosted by the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the European Society of Pathology: Results of a workshop on AIH histology hosted by the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the European Society of Pathology.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnostic histological criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have not been clearly established. Previously published criteria focused mainly on chronic AIH, in which inflammatory changes mainly occur in portal/periportal regions and may not be applicable to acute presentation of AIH, in which inflammatory changes are typically predominantly lobular in location. International consensus criteria for the diagnosis and assessment of disease severity in both acute and chronic AIH are thus urgently needed. METHODS: Seventeen expert liver pathologists convened at an international workshop and subsequently used a modified Delphi panel approach to establish consensus criteria for the histopathological diagnosis of AIH. RESULTS: The consensus view is that liver biopsy should remain standard for diagnosing AIH. AIH is considered likely, if there is a predominantly portal lymphoplasmacytic hepatitis with more than mild interface activity and/or more than mild lobular hepatitis in the absence of histological features suggestive of another liver disease. AIH is also considered likely if there is predominantly lobular hepatitis with or without centrilobular necroinflammation and at least one of the following features: portal lymphoplasmacytic hepatitis, interface hepatitis or portal-based fibrosis, in the absence of histological features suggestive of another liver disease. Emperipolesis and hepatocellular rosettes are not regarded as being specific for AIH. CONCLUSIONS: The criteria proposed in this consensus statement provide a uniform approach to the histological diagnosis of AIH, which is relevant for patients with an acute as well as a chronic presentation and to more accurately reflect the current understanding of liver pathology in AIH.

Hepatocellular neoplasms with loss of liver fatty acid binding protein: Clinicopathologic features and molecular profiling.

HNF1A-inactivated hepatocellular adenomas (H-HCA) show steatosis, no atypia and loss of liver fatty acid binding protein (LFABP). LFABP loss also occurs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study examines 68 LFABP-negative tumors: 33 typical H-HCA, 10 atypical hepatocellular neoplasms (AHN), 7 well-differentiated (WD) HCC, 18 moderately or poorly differentiated (MD/PD) HCC. Capture based sequencing was performed in 13 cases (8 AHN, 5 WD-HCC). Patients with HCA, AHN and WD-HCC were nearly all women. AHN and WD-HCC resembled H-HCA but had higher degree of atypia and/or reticulin loss. Variant features like inconspicuous fat (59% vs. 12%, p = 0.03), predominance of eosinophilic cells (59% vs. 21%, p = 0.01) and pseudoacini were more common in AHN and WD-HCC. Myxoid change and prominent lipofuscin were more common in WD-HCC (29% each) than H-HCA and AHN combined (2% and 7% respectively). Compared to WD-HCC, LFABP-negative MD/PD HCC were more commonly associated with male gender, viral hepatitis and cirrhosis. Biallelic HNF1A alterations were seen in all 13 (100%) sequenced cases. Additional mutations and/or copy number alterations were observed in 38% of AHN and 100% of WD-HCC. Diffuse glutamine synthetase (GS) staining was seen in 13% of cases, with no nuclear ß-catenin or Wnt signaling alterations. In conclusion, variant features such as lack of fat, peliosis, myxoid change, pseudoacini and abundant lipofuscin are more common in AHN and/or WD-HCC. LFABP-negative MD/PD HCC have different clinicopathologic features compared to WD-HCC. The significance of diffuse GS in a subset of these cases is unclear.

Dataset for Pathology Reporting of Colorectal Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study to describe a new international dataset for pathology reporting of colorectal cancer surgical specimens, produced under the auspices of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). BACKGROUND: Quality of pathology reporting and mutual understanding between colorectal surgeon, pathologist and oncologist are vital to patient management. Some pathology parameters are prone to variable interpretation, resulting in differing positions adopted by existing national datasets. METHODS: The ICCR, a global alliance of major pathology institutions with links to international cancer organizations, has developed and ratified a rigorous and efficient process for the development of evidence-based, structured datasets for pathology reporting of common cancers. Here we describe the production of a dataset for colorectal cancer resection specimens by a multidisciplinary panel of internationally recognized experts. RESULTS: The agreed dataset comprises eighteen core (essential) and seven non-core (recommended) elements identified from a review of current evidence. Areas of contention are addressed, some highly relevant to surgical practice, with the aim of standardizing multidisciplinary discussion. The summation of all core elements is considered to be the minimum reporting standard for individual cases. Commentary is provided, explaining each element's clinical relevance, definitions to be applied where appropriate for the agreed list of value options and the rationale for considering the element as core or non-core. CONCLUSIONS: This first internationally agreed dataset for colorectal cancer pathology reporting promotes standardization of pathology reporting and enhanced clinicopathological communication. Widespread adoption will facilitate international comparisons, multinational clinical trials and help to improve the management of colorectal cancer globally.

Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

AIMS: Current guidelines for pathology reporting on pancreatic cancer differ in certain aspects, resulting in divergent reporting practices and a lack of comparability of data. Here, we report on a new international dataset for pathology reporting on resection specimens with cancer of the exocrine pancreas (ductal adenocarcinoma and acinar cell carcinoma). The dataset was produced under the auspices of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR), which is a global alliance of major (inter)national pathology and cancer organisations. METHODS AND RESULTS: According to the ICCR's rigorous process for dataset development, an international expert panel consisting of pancreatic pathologists, a pancreatic surgeon and an oncologist produced a set of core and non-core data items based on a critical review and discussion of current evidence. Commentary was provided for each data item to explain the rationale for selecting it as a core or non-core element and its clinical relevance, and to highlight potential areas of disagreement or lack of evidence, in which case a consensus position was formulated. Following international public consultation, the document was finalised and ratified, and the dataset, which includes a synoptic reporting guide, was published on the ICCR website. CONCLUSIONS: This first international dataset for cancer of the exocrine pancreas is intended to promote high-quality, standardised pathology reporting. Its widespread adoption will improve the consistency of reporting, facilitate multidisciplinary communication, and enhance the comparability of data, all of which will help to improve the management of pancreatic cancer patients.