Factors Contributing to the Need for Non-Elective Explant following Surgical Repair of Tibial Tuberosity Avulsion Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors contributing to the need for non-elective explant following surgical repair of tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicentre case-control study. Over a 5-year period, dogs (n = 63) that underwent surgical repair of tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures (n = 64) were considered. Dogs that underwent a non-elective explant were compared with those that did not. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared with the Fisher's exact test. Variables which were significant on univariate analysis were entered into a multiple logistic regression model. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Non-elective explant was performed in 20/64 fractures and elective explant was performed in 2/64 fractures. Neutered dogs were found to be 19 times (95% confidence interval: 2.1-172) more likely to require explant compared with intact dogs (p = 0.009). Every 0.25 mm increase in average pin size was found to make it 2.5 times (95% confidence interval: 1.3-4.9) more likely to require explant (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that use of the smallest appropriate pin should be considered for standard surgical repair of tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures to minimize the risk of requiring non-elective explant.

Comparison of carbon dioxide laser versus bipolar vessel device for staphylectomy for the treatment of brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and bipolar vessel sealing device (BSD) are industry standards for soft palate resection. No studies exist to directly compare these 2 techniques in a clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare clinical outcomes for dogs that underwent CO2 laser versus BSD staphylectomy. Medical records of brachycephalic dogs that underwent CO2 laser (Group-L) or BSD staphylectomies (Group-B) between September 2013 and September 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Of 60 dogs that met the inclusion criteria, 26 dogs (43%) were designated Group-L and 34 (57%) Group-B. Techniques did not differ in procedure or anesthetic time (P = 0.52 and P = 0.19, respectively) or major complication rates [intraoperative (P = 1.00), post-operative (P = 0.72), short-term (P = 1.00), and long-term (P = 0.68)]. This study suggests that patient outcomes are similar for dogs undergoing staphylectomy performed by CO2 laser and BSD.

Comparaison du laser au gaz carbonique par rapport au dispositif de coagulation bipolaire lors de la staphylectomie pour le traitement du syndrome de brachycéphalie d'obstruction des voies respiratoires. Le laser au gaz carbonique (CO2) et le dispositif de coagulation bipolaire sont des normes de l'industrie pour la résection du palais mou. Aucune étude n'existe afin de comparer ces deux techniques dans un milieu clinique. Le but de cette étude consistait à décrire et à comparer les résultats cliniques pour les chiens qui ont subi une opération au laser CO2 par rapport à une staphylectomie à l'aide d'un dispositif de coagulation bipolaire. Les dossiers médicaux de chiens brachycéphales qui ont subi des staphylectomies au laser CO2 (Groupe-L) ou à l'aide d'un dispositif de coagulation bipolaire (Groupe-B) entre septembre 2013 et septembre 2017 ont été examinés rétrospectivement. Parmi les 60 chiens qui satisfaisaient aux critères d'inclusion, 26 chiens (43 %) ont été désignés dans le Groupe-L et 34 (57 %) dans le Groupe-B. Les techniques n'ont pas différé pour la durée de l'intervention ou de l'anesthésie (P = 0,52 et P = 0,19, respectivement) ou les taux de complications majeures [intra-opératoires (P = 1,00), postopératoires (P = 0,72), à court terme (P = 1,00) et à long terme (P = 0,68)]. Cette étude suggère que les résultats des patients sont semblables pour les chiens subissant une staphylectomie réalisée par laser au CO2 et à l'aide d'un dispositif de coagulation bipolaire.(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).

Comparison of Initial and Postlavage Bacterial Culture Results of Septic Peritonitis in Dogs and Cats.

Septic peritonitis is a common, life-threatening condition encountered in dogs and cats. Efficacy of peritoneal lavage has not been proven in veterinary studies. Our objective was to evaluate differences in bacterial identity and susceptibility in samples obtained pre- and postlavage in animals who underwent laparotomy for treatment of septic peritonitis and to assess the effect of empirical antimicrobial selection on survival. Culture samples were collected from the peritoneal surface pre- and postlavage from dogs and cats treated surgically for septic peritonitis. Culture results were compared for each patient with regard to bacterial isolates and bacterial susceptibility profiles. Survival to discharge was evaluated. Microbial growth occurred in at least one culture in 88.6% of patients. There was no significant difference in bacterial isolates or susceptibility profiles pre- versus postlavage. Positive culture pre- or postlavage and appropriate antimicrobial selection did not significantly affect survival. For individual animals, culture results differed between pre- and postlavage samples, although no definitive effect of peritoneal lavage was seen for the population as a whole. Antimicrobials most commonly effective against isolates were Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, and Imipenem. If prompt surgical source control is employed, antibiotic choice may not affect clinical outcome.

Effect of ulnar ostectomy on intra-articular pressure mapping and contact mechanics of the congruent and incongruent canine elbow ex vivo.

OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) the effect of elbow incongruity on contact mechanics and (2) the effect of treatment of this incongruity with 1 of 2 ulnar ostectomies in the canine elbow. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Unpaired cadaveric canine forelimbs (n = 17). METHODS: In a servohydraulic testing frame, thin-film pressure sensors were placed into the lateral and medial compartments of the elbow. Specimens were tested in 135° of elbow joint flexion at 200 N of cyclic axial force, followed by a 20 seconds hold. Intra-articular contact area (CA), mean contact pressure (mCP) and peak contact pressure (pCP) were measured in each compartment. After radial shortening, testing was repeated and limbs randomized into proximal ulnar ostectomy with IM pin (PUO) or sequential distal ulnar ostectomy (DUO), interosseous ligament release (DUO-L), and ulnar attachment of the abductor pollicis longus muscle and interosseous membrane release (DUO-ML). Paired t-tests were used to compare each treatment to baseline values. Differences between treatment groups were evaluated with a mixed model with random effect to adjust for the clustering of limbs within dog. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Radial shortening resulted in shift of mCP and pCP from the lateral to the medial compartment. The PUO group resulted in normalization of medial compartment mCP and decrease of pCP, whereas in the DUO group return to baseline was achieved only after DUO-ML. CONCLUSION: PUO is effective in unloading medial compartment pCP in an incongruent joint.