An intervention study to promote self-improvement of lifestyle in a Japanese community: a new health support program.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of two health support programs developed to improve the lifestyle of community residents through exercise, nutrition-based health education, and group dynamics. METHODS: A total of 171 subjects were selected from community residents showing an abnormal result in at least one metabolic syndrome-related laboratory test. The subjects were divided into two groups: a group participating only in the 5-month initiation program (i.e., the initial program; n = 83), and a group participating both the initiation program and the subsequent 6-month enhancing program (i.e., the total program; n = 88). Each group was followed up for 1 year after completing the intervention program. The effectiveness of the intervention was determined based on data from the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II and laboratory tests, which were collected four times during the 2-year follow-up. Thirty-nine individuals were selected as the control group, based on the same criteria, to confirm the effectiveness of completing the intervention program. RESULTS: The results demonstrate that completion of the initiation programe was an effective intervention in terms of individual improvements in lifestyle and laboratory test results. The improvements achieved by the end of the initiation program had been sustained at the end of the total program, and were similar in both groups. One year after the end of the total program, both groups showed similar findings, confirming the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of two health support programs for improving the lifestyle of community residents. It is worth noting that, at the end of the 2-year follow-up, the improvements in lifestyle due to the initiation program were similar to those of the total program.

Description of environmental determinants of quality of life in children with intellectual disability in Japan using the Delphi technique.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to define the framework of an environment conducive to the well-being of children with intellectually disability (CID). METHODS: A questionnaire composed of 31 items was developed through literature review. Then a 2-round Delphi survey was conducted with 3 different panels: health professionals (HPs), parents of CID, and teachers. The participants were asked to rate each item, select and rank the 10 most important items, and suggest additional ones. RESULTS: A total of 71 participants responded to the first round: 24 HPs, 22 parents, and 25 teachers. In the second round the overall response rate was 83%. At the end of the exercise, 12 items reached global consensus, i.e., in all groups. Only 5 items were ranked as most important by all groups: attitudes of family members at home; attitudes of HPs and teachers; support from family members at home; support at school (classmates and teachers); and government policies. Nevertheless, the panelists' views diverged on the remaining items. Several additional elements were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The views of HPs, teachers, and parents are complementary for the improvement of quality of life (QOL) of CID. The present findings will be used as a basis for the development of an instrument to assess the living environment of CID.