[High correlation between the different measures suggests that mortality is relatively correctly reported in Sweden]. / God samstämmighet mellan olika svenska mått på avlidna i covid-19.

Infection fatality ratio (IFR) in covid-19 is highly debated in international and Swedish press. In Sweden, three different estimates have been used to estimate mortality, based on statistics either from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, and the Public Health Agency of Sweden, whereas excess mortality calculated by EuroMOMO. Mortality is based on death certificates, which can be accurate or erroneous, but previous analyses have suggested that over- and underdiagnosis usually even out. EuroMOMO on the other hand reports all-cause mortality compared to an estimated baseline. In view of high correlation between the different measures, we suggest that mortality is relatively correctly reported in Sweden. We discuss IFR internationally  and in Sweden, and suggest that IFR in the Western world is approximately 0.5-1%. However, these numbers will change over time depending on immunity induced by vaccination efforts, but also the potential spread of new virus variants.

[Syncope - contemporary management]. / Differentialdiagnostik och handläggning vid synkope - Riskstratifiering kan underlätta handläggningen, visar nya riktlinjer från europeiska kardiologföreningen.

Syncope is the chief complaint in 1-2 percent of emergency department visits. Syncope belongs to the broader category transient loss of consciousness (TLOC), defined as a short loss of consciousness with loss of awareness and responsiveness, and with subsequent amnesia for the event. Syncope is defined as TLOC due to cerebral hypoperfusion, with rapid onset and spontaneous complete recovery. The main categories of syncope are reflex syncope, orthostatic hypotension, and cardiac syncope. The 2018 guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology emphasizes the process of risk stratification in the initial management of suspected syncope. Risk stratification serves to separate the patients with likely orthostatic and reflex syncope with good prognosis from the patients with likely cardiac syncope and high short-term risk of an adverse outcome. It determines the appropriate next level of care. Further evaluation should be based on clinical suspicion and frequency of symptoms.