Primary eyecare in paediatrics population (PREPP) - II study: Study of satisfaction of services and barrier for not reporting to the base hospital on referral among pediatric patients treated in six major vision centers of a tertiary eye care facility in Southern India.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted in continuation of Primary Eyecare in Paediatrics Population (PREPP-I) and was aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with pediatric-eye-care services across six vision centers (VCs) of a tertiary eye hospital in Southern India. The barriers among the parents for not attending the base hospital (BH) when referred from these VCs were also evaluated. METHODS: A standard-validated-satisfaction questionnaire (VSQ) was used to assess patient satisfaction. Responses were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) against each response. Responses were expressed as percentages with 0 (very dissatisfied) and 100% (very satisfied). Patients were referred with a form mentioning reasons for referral (urgent/non-urgent). All referrals were evaluated by the principal investigator. In case of failure to report, parents were enquired about the barrier based on the validated barrier questionnaire (VBQ) over a telephonic conversation. RESULTS: All 250 patients of the PREPP-1 study were included in the satisfaction study. Different domains were evaluated using VSQ (accessibility of VC, waiting hours, financial aspects, spectacle dispensing service, and teleophthalmology). The overall satisfaction was 75%. The most common reason for dissatisfaction was the lack of meeting the ophthalmologist in person, followed by waiting time. 58 patients wanted to visit BH to consult a pediatric ophthalmologist in person (23%). For the barrier study, 14 out of 47 referrals did not report and were evaluated using VBQ (knowledge, physical, time, and financial barriers). The majority had a financial barrier (43%), followed by knowledge (28.6%) and time barrier (14%). CONCLUSION: PREPP-II demonstrated that 3/4 th of pediatric patients are happy to be treated at VC with teleophthalmology services. However, a significant percentage want to consult a specialist at BH. One-fourth of total referrals did not report to BH due to financial constraints and a lack of awareness of the child's condition.

Acute abducens nerve palsy with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis-like presentation following COVID-19 vaccination.

We report two adult cases of abducens nerve palsy presenting immediately (within weeks) after they received the first dose of Covishield vaccination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain obtained after the onset of diplopia demonstrated demyelinating changes. The patients had associated systemic symptoms. Post-vaccination demyelination typically known as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) associated with several vaccines is more common in children. Although the mechanism of the nerve palsy remains unclear, it is suspected to be related to the post-vaccine neuroinflammatory syndrome. Cranial nerve palsies and ADEM-like presentations may represent part of the neurologic spectrum following COVID-vaccination in adults, and ophthalmologists should be aware of these sequelae. Although cases of sixth nerve palsy following COVID vaccination are already reported, associated MRI changes have not been reported from India.

A study of referral pattern to pediatric ophthalmology department in a tertiary eye-care center of South-India.

PURPOSE: The study was aimed at finding out the present pattern of referrals to the Pediatric Ophthalmology outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary eye care hospital and thus identify the discrepancy of referral, if any, which would help to modify and enhance the practice guidelines. METHODS: The study was conducted by retrospectively collecting data from all referral letters that were already uploaded in the Electronic Medical Report (EMR) against all patients from June 2019 to December 2019. All pediatric patients in the age group of 0-16 years were included in the study. The practicing field of referring clinicians was noted along with the maximum information that could be collected from the referral letter and were thus assessed for the quality, accuracy, and timely referral. RESULTS: Out of 77 referrals received in the study period, six referral letters neither had any mention of the designation of the referring clinician nor any specific diagnosis or details. Thus, only 71 patients were included for further study. The referring clinicians were mainly ophthalmologists, pediatricians, general practitioners (GPs), and others (cardiologists, neurologists). Maximum patients were referred by ophthalmologists (76%) but visual acuity was noted only for 30% of these patients. Almost half of the referral diagnosis was accurate. Pediatrician referrals were found to be more detailed and précised. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a standardized hospital-specific format of referrals and basic training to primary care providers on some simple tests (Lights reflex tests) for identifying the "red flags" in pediatric eye examination and thus enhancing the quality and timely referral per se.

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in self-reported diabetics among various ethnic groups and associated risk factors in North-East India: A hospital-based study.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among different ethnic groups of North-East India and to study the associated risk factors. METHODS: In this hospital based cross sectional study 7,133 individuals among the age group of 20-79 years, attending the OPD, were screened for presence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (HbA1c >7% or previously diagnosed). Among them, 780 (10.94%) had diabetes; they were evaluated for presence of any retinopathy (based on fundus photograph and fluorescein angiography), its grade (based on International DR severity scale), and risk factors. DR patients were further grouped into different ethnicities (Assamese, Bengali, minor tribes, and other immigrants). RESULTS: Of the 780 patients with diabetes, 58 patients had type 1 DM and 722 patients had type 2 DM. The overall prevalence of DR was 30.0% with vision-threatening retinopathy and maculopathy being 10.00% and 4.49%, respectively. The prevalence of retinopathy range was the highest in the immigrants' group (50.00% among type 1 DM and 44.93% among type 2 DM) and lowest in the tribal's groups (16.67% among type 1 DM and 22.35% among type 2 DM). The risk factors showing significant association with DR were longer diabetes duration, older age, family history of diabetes, higher HbA1c level, associated hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and pregnancy state (P value <0.05). CONCLUSION: Every third patient with diabetes had some form of DR with Vision Threatening DR (VTDR) affecting every tenth patient. There was also a wide variation in the prevalence of DR among ethnic groups and this difference could not be attributed to variation in the known measurable risk factors among different ethnic groups, thus signifying the role of ethnicity in occurrence and severity of DR.

Safe Slit-lamp Shield: Maintaining a balance between ergonomics and safety.

Since the emergence of COVID pandemic, health workers have been facing major challenges every day. Ophthalmology practice has encountered countless modifications in the practice pattern not to jeopardize patient care and at the same time maintain all safety measures to reduce transmission. One such modification we made was the Safe Slit-Lamp Shield (SSS) which has been found to be extremely protective in differentiation to other available shield. Although SSS has a larger surface area when compared to already available shields, it won't compromise the comfort of the clinician at the same time gives satisfactory protection.