Anesthesia Preoperative Clinic Evaluation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Nasal Fiberoptic Videoendoscopy: A Pilot Study Comparison with Polysomnography.

BACKGROUND: Nasal fiberoptic videoendoscopy is an established technique to assess upper airway pathology in conscious and sedated patients. OBJECTIVES: The authors conducted a prospective proof-of-concept pilot study to evaluate whether airway narrowing detected using nasal fiberoptic videoendoscopy in the anesthesia preoperative clinic was capable of defining the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients scheduled for elective surgery. METHODS: After application of topical local anesthesia (4% lidocaine with phenylephrine), sixteen patients (ASA physical status 2 or 3) underwent nasal fiberoptic videoendoscopy in sitting position. The magnitudes of retropalatal and retrolingual luminal narrowing were assessed as predictors of OSA. Patients also underwent polysomnography and completed STOP-Bang questionnaires. The endoscopist's clinical impression of OSA severity based on the history and airway examination was quantified. RESULTS: Retropalatal luminal narrowing and STOP-Bang score ≥ 4 predicted OSA severity as either "none or mild" or "moderate to severe" in 13 (81%) and 9 (56%) of 16 patients who underwent polysomnography, respectively. OSA severity was significantly (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) associated with retropalatal airway narrowing (P = 0.0048), STOP-BANG score (P = 0.0072), and body mass index (P = 0.0091), whereas clinical impression and retrolingual pharyngeal narrowing were not (P=0.093 and P = 0.11, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that nasal fiberoptic videoendoscopy quantification of retropalatal airway narrowing may be a useful tool for assessing the severity of OSA in the anesthesia preoperative clinic. The current findings document a proof-of-concept feasibility of nasal fiberoptic videoendoscopy as a screening tool for OSA in conscious patients during preoperative evaluation that may justify further prospective clinical trials of this technique.

Anesthesia Preoperative Clinic Referral for Elevated Hba1c Reduces Complication Rate in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is risk factor for complications after orthopedic surgery. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that anesthesia preoperative clinic (APC) referral for elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduces complication rate after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 203) with and without DM were chosen from 1,237 patients undergoing TJA during 2006 - 12. Patients evaluated in the APC had surgery in 2006 - 8 regardless of HbA1c (uncontrolled). Those evaluated between in subsequent two-year intervals were referred to primary care for HbA1c ≥ 10% and ≥ 8%, respectively, to improve DM control before surgery. Complications and mortality were quantified postoperatively and at three, six, and twelve months. Length of stay (LOS) and patients requiring a prolonged LOS (> 5 days) were recorded. RESULTS: Patients (197 men, 6 women) underwent 71, 131, and 1 total hip, knee, and shoulder replacements, respectively. Patients undergoing TJA with uncontrolled HbA1c and those with HbA1c < 10%, but not those with HbA1c < 8%, had a higher incidence of coronary disease and hypercholesterolemia than patients without DM. An increase in complication rate was observed in DM patients with uncontrolled HbA1c versus patients without DM (P < 0.001); the complication rate progressively decreased with tighter HbA1c control. More DM patients with preoperative HbA1c that was uncontrolled or ≥ 10% required prolonged LOS versus those without DM (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0404, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: APC referral for elevated HbA1c reduces complication rate and the incidence of prolonged hospitalization during the first year after surgery in diabetics undergoing TJA.

Utility of preoperative anesthesia clinic videoendoscopy for airway management planning.

INTRODUCTION: The authors performed videolaryngoscopy during the preoperative anesthesia clinic evaluation of a patient with chronic dyspnea, stridor, and a previous hemilaryngectomy scheduled to undergo a series of orthopedic surgery procedures for an infected knee arthroplasty. The findings proved crucial for determining airway management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man presented to the preoperative anesthesia clinic for work-up before anticipated removal of infected total knee arthroplasty hardware, placement of antibiotic spacers, incision and drainage procedures, and revision arthroplasty. The patient had previously undergone a hemilaryngectomy and tracheostomy (now closed) for squamous cell carcinoma of the right true vocal cord. The patient described chronic dyspnea with minimal exertion. Inspiratory and expiratory wheezes and intermittent inspiratory stridor were present. A transnasal videolaryngoscopy examination was performed using topical anesthesia and demonstrated significant supraglottic scarring, a narrowed glottis, and subglottic stenosis. A computed tomography study confirmed the presence of tracheomalacia with subglottic stenosis. A permanent tracheostomy was performed to establish a definitive airway before the knee arthroplasty was removed. CONCLUSIONS: The case illustrates that transnasal videolaryngoscopy conducted in the preoperative anesthesia clinic is capable of providing key information to guide airway management in patients with significant upper airway pathology.

A group-based brief intervention for surgery patients with high-risk substance use.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the feasibility and efficacy of a psychosocial intervention to address high-risk substance use in patients scheduled for elective surgery. METHOD: A group-format intervention, based on motivational interviewing principles, was provided prior to elective surgery to 107 participants with at-risk substance use, identified using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Condensed (AUDIT-C) and self-report of illicit drug use. Patient satisfaction was assessed with an anonymous survey. Within-subject comparisons of substance use at baseline and at a postoperative follow-up evaluation were conducted. A control group of 67 surgery patients reporting high-risk substance use completed baseline assessments and received usual care. Medical outcomes and measures of utilization were compared between groups. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction with the brief intervention was high. A paired t test comparing average pre- and post-AUDIT-C scores showed significant reduction in substance use postsurgery (t = 9.94, P = .000), and participants reported intention to maintain reduced substance use levels. Between-group analyses revealed no significant differences in medical complications or utilization. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that a group-based intervention for substance use disorder can be implemented as part of preoperative care and may contribute to decreased substance use prior to and following surgery. Further work is needed to identify methods to reduce adverse medical outcomes in surgical patients.