RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) is poor. Median survival of these patients following chemotherapy is in the range of 6 to 9 months. In the present randomized phase III trial we compared two new combinations containing new drugs with proven activity in phase II studies with patients with HNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1999 until November 2004, 166 eligible patients with HNC were enrolled in the study. They were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (group A, 85 patients) or with paclitaxel, as in group A, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks (group B, 81 patients). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in response rate (20% versus 29%, P = 0.21), time to disease progression (median; 4.4 months versus 6.0 months, P = 0.09) and survival (median; 8.6 months versus 11.05 months, P = 0.25). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported side effect, apart from alopecia, was neutropenia. Overall, there was no significant difference in severe toxicity between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The present study could not demonstrate a survival benefit with either regimen. Both treatments were well tolerated. Randomized studies comparing each of the two regimens with standard chemotherapy are warranted.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/economia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/economia , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Doxorrubicina/economia , Feminino , Grécia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/economia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , GencitabinaRESUMO
Cytotoxic chemotherapy, particularly the regimens that contain 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), can produce diarrhea. Octreotide acetate appears to have a major therapeutic effect in the management of 5-FU-induced diarrhea. A prospective study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of two different doses of octreotide acetate, 100 µg and 500 µg three times daily, for the treatment of severe 5-FU-induced diarrhea refractory to loperamide, and also to evaluate whether the higher dose is more effective in the management of this complication. Fifty-nine patients with tissue-documented colorectal and head and neck carcinoma were enrolled in this study, 28 in the 100 µg arm and 31 in the 500 µg arm of octreotide acetate which was administered s.c. three times daily. Patients were required to have National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria = grade 3 diarrhea secondary to treatment with the 5-FU regimen. Octreotide acetate was well tolerated by all patients. Complete resolution of diarrhea was achieved in 17 of 28 (60.71%) patients treated with 100 µg, and in 28 of 31 (90.32%) patients treated with 500 µg of octreotide (p < 0.05). This study suggests a significant benefit in the treatment of 5-FU-induced diarrhea in favor of the 500 µg versus the 100 µg arm. These results support the dose-response effect of octreotide acetate. Even though higher doses of octreotide are more expensive, the cost saved in reduced hospitalization makes the higher dose more cost-effective.