Detecting Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Amplification: Proof of Concept of an Alternative Approach.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple genes that are co-amplified along with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in chromosome 17. GRB7 and PGAP3 are two such genes. We hypothesize that the protein products of these genes may serve as immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers for detecting HER2 amplification in breast cancer. METHODS: Tissue sections from one hundred and thirty-five primary breast carcinoma cases were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for antibodies against HER2, GRB7, and PGAP3 and graded on a scale of 1 to 3. Both membranous staining and cytoplasmic staining were assessed for GRB7 and PGAP3. For equivocal HER2 IHC positivity, fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed to get the final HER2 status. RESULTS: IHC staining for GRB7 and PGAP 3 was a moderate to strong predictor for HER2 status (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.768, 0.868,0.754, and 0.790 for GRB7 membranous staining, GRB7 cytoplasmic staining, PGAP3 membranous staining, and PGAP3 cytoplasmic staining respectively). A combination of GRB7 cytoplasmic and PGAP3 membranous staining resulted in an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI 0.855-0.954), while a combination of GRB7 and PGAP3 cytoplasmic staining resulted in an AUC of 0.902 (95% CI 0.851-0.953). CONCLUSION: The point estimates for the AUC of GRB7 and combined GRB7 and PGAP3 in predicting the AUC suggest a strong predictive ability of these markers to predict HER2. With further refinement in technique, cytoplasmic staining and membranous IHC staining for GRB7 and PGAP3 have potential to serve as surrogate markers for HER2 status. The strategy of using protein products of co-amplified genes of HER2 is likely to be successful in technical validation.

A Case-Based Review of Arthritis Robustus.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly presents as a chronic additive symmetric inflammatory polyarthritis involving the small and large joints. Rarely do patients present with few or no clinical symptoms, despite apparent signs of inflammation. This condition, known as arthritis robustus, typically occurs in elderly males who are manual laborers with an active lifestyle. It is essential to diagnose arthritis robustus and start treatment promptly to avoid the development of deformities and other complications in the future.

Efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors compared to sulphonylureas in adult patients with diabetes with low c-peptide levels with or without anti-GAD65 antibody positivity.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adulthood (LADA) is different from type 2 diabetes. Present treatment protocols do not reflect that. DPP-4 and SGLT2 inhibitors have changed therapy. DPP-4 inhibitor use has shown delayed decline in beta-cell reserve in LADA. We studied patients with low c-peptide to assess relationship between c-peptide and anti-GAD65 antibody levels and compare DPP-4 inhibitors with SGLT2 inhibitors and sulphonylureas. METHODS: The study was an open-label trial conducted in 156 participants with low c-peptide (<0.8 ng/mL), age > 25 years, recently diagnosed diabetes with HBA1c ≥ 6.5%. Participants were enrolled into three arms: Group A received sulphonylureas + metformin, Group B received DPP-4 inhibitors + metformin, and Group C received SGLT-2 inhibitors + metformin. Serum anti-GAD-65 antibodies were assessed using sandwich ELISA. Participants were assessed on enrolment and after three months of dual pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: The three arms were comparable on enrolment. 52% of participants with low c-peptide had high anti-GAD65 antibody titers. Significant differences were observed after three months - DPP-4 inhibitors reduced HbA1c by 1.1 ± 0.3%, compared to SGLT2 inhibitors (0.8 ± 0.13%) and sulphonylureas (0.7 ± 0.3%) CONCLUSION: DPP-4 inhibitors appear to provide better glycemic control than alternate therapeutic options in patients with low serum c-peptide.

Clinical tools for cardiorespiratory assessment and rehabilitation: A primary care perspective.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected millions of people worldwide. It mainly affects the respiratory system, seen as pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovascular manifestations have been observed in some patients. Hence, cardiorespiratory assessment is an important component of diagnosis, management and follow-up of this disease. Primary care is the first point of contact with the healthcare system for most patients. Therefore, methods for assessment and rehabilitation should be feasible in a primary care setting. This commentary aims to provide a primary care perspective on existing clinical tools for cardiorespiratory assessment and rehabilitation.

Telavancin: a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide agent to counter the challenge of resistant Gram-positive pathogens.

Telavancin (TD-6424), a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide vancomycin-derivative, is a novel antimicrobial agent developed by Theravance for overcoming resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections, specifically methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) had approved telavancin in 2009 for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA (S. aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus anginosus group, or Enterococcus faecalis). Telavancin has two proposed mechanisms of action. In vitro, telavancin has a rapid, concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, due to disruption of cell membrane integrity. Telavancin has demonstrable in vitro activity against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria. Telavancin and vancomycin have similar spectra of activity. Gram-negative bacteria are usually non-susceptible to telavancin. Telavancin has been successfully tested in various animal models of bacteremia, endocarditis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Phase II Telavancin versus Standard Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections due to Gram-Positive Bacteria (FAST 1 and FAST 2) and phase III [Assessment of Telavancin in Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections 1 (ATLAS 1 and ATLAS 2)] clinical trials have been conducted for evaluating telavancin's efficacy and safety in cSSSIs. Phase III clinical trials have been carried out for evaluating telavancin's safety and efficacy in nosocomial pneumonia [Assessment of Telavancin for Treatment of Hospital acquired Pneumonia 1 and 2 (ATTAIN 1 and ATTAIN 2)]. A phase II randomized, double-blind, clinical trial has been carried out for evaluating telavancin's safety and efficacy in uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia [Telavancin for Treatment of Uncomplicated S. aureus Bacteremia (ASSURE)]. Pacemaker lead-related infective endocarditis due to a vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain (non-daptomycin susceptible) was successfully treated with parenteral telavancin for 8 weeks. Telavancin extensively binds to serum albumin (~93%) and has a relatively small volume of distribution. Telavancin is not biotransformed by any cytochrome P450 microsomal enzymes and excreted mainly in the urine. Though well-tolerated, worrisome adverse effects, including renal dysfunction and QTc prolongation are of potential concern. Given its extensive binding to plasma proteins, long half-life, and a long post-antibiotic effect, it represents a promising addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in combating infections caused by resistant Gram-positive pathogens, namely, MRSA.