Randomized clinical trial of fluid and salt restriction compared with a controlled liberal regimen in elective gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Excessive intravenous fluid prescription may play a causal role in postoperative complications following major gastrointestinal resectional surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fluid and salt restriction would decrease postoperative complications compared with a more modern controlled liberal regimen. METHODS: In this observer-blinded single-site randomized clinical trial consecutive patients undergoing major gastrointestinal resectional surgery were randomized to receive either a liberal control fluid regimen or a restricted fluid and salt regimen. The primary outcome was postoperative complications of grade II and above (moderate to severe). RESULTS: Some 240 patients (194 colorectal resections and 46 oesophagogastric resections) were enrolled in the study; 121 patients were randomized to the restricted regimen and 119 to the control (liberal) regimen. During surgery the control group received a median (interquartile range) fluid volume of 2033 (1576-2500) ml and sodium input of 282 (213-339) mmol, compared with 1000 (690-1500) ml and 142 (93-218) mmol respectively in the restricted group. There was no significant difference in major complication rate between groups (38·0 and 39·0 per cent respectively). Median (range) hospital stay was 8 (3-101) days in the controls and 8 (range 3-76) days among those who received restricted fluids. There were four in-hospital deaths in the control group and two in the restricted group. Substantial differences in weight change, serum sodium, osmolality and urine : serum osmolality ratio were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in major complication rates, length of stay and in-hospital deaths when fluid restriction was used compared with a more liberal regimen. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN39295230 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Poor outcome of oesophageal adenocarcinoma after prior antireflux surgery.

AIMS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is an important risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma, but abolishing reflux through surgery has not been shown to reduce this risk. The purpose of this study is to report on adenocarcinomas occurring after previous antireflux surgery and their long-term outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and forty three patients underwent surgical resection in our unit for oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2009. Nine of these had antireflux surgery a median of 6.9 (mean of 9.3) years previously. Clinical and pathological characteristics and outcome (in terms of survival) are described for this patient group. The patients who had prior antireflux surgery were compared to matched control patients for disease free survival. RESULTS: Disease free survival in our antireflux patients was 25.1% as compared to 72.1% in controls at 3 years. (Log rank test p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone antireflux surgery for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can develop adenocarcinoma and need to be monitored closely. The outcome following surgery appears greatly worse for patients with previous antireflux surgery than age/sex/stage/treatment matched controls in this small study.