Effect of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide in rapidly deteriorating multiple sclerosis patients resistant to conventional therapy.

Fourteen consecutive clinically definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were treated with monthly intravenous cyclophosphomide (CTX) for 6 months. All had experienced severe dinical deterioration during the 12 months prior to treatment with CTX despite treatment with conventional immunomodulating agents and intravenous methylprednisolone. Treatment with CTX led to improvement and neurologic stability within 6 months which was sustained for at least 18 months after the onset of treatment with CTX. Therapy with CTX was well tolerated. CTX may be of benefit in MS patients who experience rapid clinical worsening and are resistant to conventional therapy.

A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFN beta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

A prospective, non-randomized, open-label treatment trial was performed in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), with follow up for 12 months. Our primary objective was to prospectively compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (GA, Copaxone) on the relapse rate in patients with RRMS. Between August 1996 and September 1999, 156 consecutive patients with clinically definite RRMS with a Kurtzke scale (EDSS) score of 4 or less were followed for 12 months, from the time of initiating therapy or electing to remain untreated. Prior 2-year relapse history and available chart information was carefully reviewed at the time of enrolment. Thirty-three of 156 elected no treatment (mean age 32.5 years; mean EDSS 2.64) at enrolment; 40 elected IFNbeta-1a (mean age 32.4 years; mean EDSS 2.69), 41 IFNbeta-1b (mean age 32.1 years; mean EDSS 2.56), and 42 chose GA (mean age 31.5 years; mean EDSS 2.57). Annual relapse rate based upon the 2 years prior to enrolment was 1.08 in the untreated group, 1.20 in the AV group, 1.21 in the BE group, and 1.10 in the GA group. There were no statistically significant differences among the four groups at enrolment. After 12 months of treatment, patients in the untreated groups had a relapse rate of 0.97, whereas patients in the IFNbeta-1a, IFNbeta-1b, and GA groups had relapse rate of 0.85, 0.61, and 0.62, respectively. Compared to the untreated group, reduction in the relapse rate was statistically significant only in the GA (P=0.003) and IFNbeta-1b (P=0.002) groups, in contrast to the IFNbeta-1a treated patients, who did not show a significant reduction (P=0.309). Compared to the untreated patients, mean EDSS was significantly reduced only in the GA (P=0.001) and IFNbeta-1b (P=0.01), in contrast to IFNbeta-1a treated patients (P=0.51). In this prospective, controlled, open-label, non-randomized 12-month study, treatment with only GA and IFNbeta-1b significantly reduced the relapse rate compared to untreated patients, supporting early treatment in RRMS. Our results are similar to the observations made after 12 months of therapy in phase III studies of IFNbeta-1a, IFNbeta-1b, and GA. Despite some limitations of the study design, the results provide helpful clinical information regarding the relative efficacy of each therapy in mildly affected treatment-naïve RRMS patients.

A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing--remitting multiple sclerosis: results after 18 months of therapy.

We previously reported results of a 12 month prospective, non-randomized, open-label treatment trial of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We now report the results after 18 months of follow-up. Our primary objective was to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and Glatiramer Acetate (GA, Copaxone) to no treatment on the relapse rate in patients with RRMS. One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients with clinically definite RRMS with a Kurtzke scale (EDSS) score of 4 or less were followed for 18 months. Prior 2-year relapse history and available chart information was carefully reviewed at the time of enrollment Thirty-three of 156 elected no treatment at enrollment; 40 elected IFNbeta-1a, 41 IFNbeta-1b, and 42 chose GA. There were no statistically significant differences among the four groups at enrollment. After 18 months of treatment 122 patients remained in their original treatment group. Compared to the untreated group (1.02), mean annualized number of relapses was significantly reduced only in the GA (0.49, P>0.0001) and IFNbeta-1b groups (0.55, P=0.001) in contrast to the IFNbeta-1a treated patients (0.81, P=0.106) who did not show a significant reduction. Despite limitations of the study design, the results provide helpful clinical information regarding the relative efficacy of each therapy in mildly affected treatment naive RRMS patients.

Regulation of myelin development.

During the final stage of oligodendrocyte differentiation, oligodendrocyte precursors cease proliferating, and coordinately activate the set of genes encoding the myelin-specific structural proteins. Two homeodomain-containing transcription factors, SCIP and Gtx, by virtue of their temporal patterns of expression, are implicated in the regulation of this process. SCIP is expressed in dividing oligodendrocyte precursors, and its expression is downregulated prior to the onset of oligodendrocyte differentiation. Gtx, in contrast, is expressed in post-mitotic, differentiated oligodendrocytes, and its expression parallels that of the myelin-specific mRNA in a variety of physiologically relevant circumstances. In addition, Gtx binds to several sites within the MBP, PLP and Gtx promoters in a sequence-specific manner probably by way of the core homeodomain binding motif. A third transcription factor, NFI, is also important for oligodendrocyte-specific gene expression, since it turns off myelin gene expression in non-myelinating cells. These three transcription factors are thus important for the normal process of oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination, and may be involved in the molecular pathogenesis of both demyelination and remyelination in multiple sclerosis.