Treatment efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with alpha-fetoprotein producing gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-Fetoprotein Producing Gastric Cancer (AFPGC) is an aggressive subgroup of gastric cancer. Recently ramucirumab has shown survival benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma, but only in those with higher Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) levels. However, the efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in AFPGC remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 352 patients who received ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy between June 2015 and December 2019. AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were elevated at diagnosis and correlated with the disease state during treatment. Non-AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were normal at diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 352 patients, 28 patients were defined as AFPGC and 246 patients were defined as non-AFPGC. AFPGC was characterized by high frequency of liver metastasis and low frequency of peritoneal metastasis compared to non-AFPGC. Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response rates in AFPGC (39.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.198) and disease control rates (86.9% vs 61.5%, p = 0.028) than those of non-AFPGC, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95%CI 3.9-7.1) in AFPGC and 4.0 months (95%CI 3.6-4.6) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.36, p = 0.66), and median overall survival (OS) was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.4-20.8) in AFPGC and 9.2 months (95% CI 8.1-10.4) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.08, p = 0.11), respectively. In multivariate analysis, AFPGC was not a negative prognostic factor both for PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response and comparable survival in AFPGC compared to those of non-AFPGC. Considering the generally poor prognosis of AFPGC, ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy might be a promising treatment option in AFPGC.

Clinical Usefulness of Postoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CLM) has high postoperative recurrence rates; therefore, optimizing perioperative treatment is imperative. Postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can aid in detecting minimal residual disease in colon cancer following curative resection. This study aimed to identify the potential role of serum CEA following liver resection in patients with CLM. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from 2004 to 2018 and enrolled patients with CLM who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and CLM. Associations between perioperative CEA levels and characteristics of recurrence were investigated. RESULTS: Recurrence was detected during a median follow-up period of 90.1 months in 343 (54.2%) out of 633 analyzed patients. Patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (75.7% versus 50.0%, p < 0.01) and shorter time until recurrence (4.4 versus 36.9 months, p < 0.01) than those in the postoperative CEA level ≤ 5 ng/ml group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml was an independent predictor, with hazard ratios of 2.77 (p < 0.01) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3.18 (p < 0.01) for overall survival (OS). Additionally, RFS was significantly shorter among patients in the postoperative CEA level > 5 ng/ml group who did not have normalized CEA levels following adjuvant chemotherapy than among those in the normalized CEA group. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative and post-adjuvant chemotherapy CEA levels in the CEA level > 5 ng/ml group may be predictors of RFS and OS.

Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018.

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted.

Correlation between circulating tumor DNA and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a biomarker with potential to reflect comprehensive genomic information and overcome intratumor heterogeneity. In contrast, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a conventional tumor marker for predicting recurrence, survival, and chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the relationship between them remains unclear. Here, the relationship between plasma ctDNA and CEA levels was evaluated to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of their clinical use. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with mCRC underwent chemotherapy were enrolled. Amplicon-based plasma genomic profiling of 14 genes that are commonly mutated in CRC by next-generation sequencing was compared to the CEA level and tumor diameter using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The overall concordance rate between the ctDNA and CEA levels was 75.5% (83/110). The correlation coefficient between the ctDNA and CEA levels was lower in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.18, p = 0.44) than in the group of patients with liver metastasis (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Although the correlation coefficients between tumor diameter and both ctDNA and CEA levels were high in the group of patients with liver metastasis, only the CEA correlation coefficient was maintained in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.53, p = 0.01). The characteristics that influenced discordance were liver metastasis and the sum of tumor diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The status of ctDNA and CEA may not be consistent in patients with mCRC without liver metastasis or with a low tumor volume; both results should be considered when deciding a treatment strategy.

[Position of the Japanese Subgroup Data from Global Trial in Advanced Gastric Cancer].

Global studies have been planned to achieve early approval of the new agent especially in cancer chemotherapy. On the other hand, it is important to consider the difference in efficacy among each region. As medical approval in Japan means reimbursement of medical cost, new drug is required to show its effectiveness in the medical situation in Japan, and the Japanese subgroup data is important. Especially in the gastric cancer field, where there is a large difference in survival time and surgical outcome between Japan and outside Japan need to consider Japanese domestic data. But characteristic of Japanese subgroup is the number of target patients is small, high censored case due to longer survival and the background factors are not even. So the interpretation of the data requires caution because of these robustness.

Effect of neutropenia on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab.

Trifluridine (FTD)/tipiracil (TPI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) is a promising late-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a well-known predictor of FTD/TPI efficacy, whether CIN is a predictive marker of efficacy for FTD/TPI + Bev remains unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of FTD/TPI + Bev and the predictive markers of its efficacy. Clinical data of patients with mCRC who received FTD/TPI + Bev at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2017 and August 2020 were retrospectively collected. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were assessed. In addition, subgroup analyses of prognostic and predictive efficacy markers were performed. In total, 94 patients (median age, 60.0 years; age range, 32-82 years; 37 men and 57 women) were included in the present study. The DCR was 44.7%, the median PFS time was 2.9 months (2.3-4.1 months) and the median OS time was 10.0 months (7.3-11.1 months). Grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment occurred in 27.7% of patients, which was significantly associated with a longer PFS time than those who did not develop CIN [3.8 months (2.3-8.4 months) vs. 2.7 months (1.8-4.0 months); P=0.008]. Furthermore, the DCR was higher in patients with grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment than those without CIN (61.5 vs. 38.2%; P=0.07). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are independent predictors for a longer PFS time (P=0.01). Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that grade 3 or 4 CIN within the first cycle of treatment are early predictors of the efficacy of FTD/TPI + Bev.

Clinical Impact of Primary Tumor Location and RAS, BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA Mutations on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Efficacy as Third-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Primary tumor location and RAS and BRAF V600E mutations are predictors of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. However, there are limited reports on their effects on the outcomes of third-line chemotherapy with EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of KRAS exon 2 wild type (WT) mCRC patients treated with EGFR inhibitor monotherapy or EGFR inhibitor plus irinotecan as third-line chemotherapy. The association between primary tumor location, RAS (KRAS exon 3, 4 or NRAS), BRAF V600E, and PIK3CA mutational status, and treatment outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included in this study. In multivariate analysis, RAS (p=0.004) and BRAF mutations (p=0.00008) were independent factors for shorter PFS. Poor performance status (p=0.01) and BRAF mutation (p=0.00002) were independent factors for shorter OS, whereas primary tumor location and PIK3CA mutation did not influence survival. CONCLUSION: Additional analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations could contribute to the selection of patients who are likely to benefit from third-line EGFR inhibitors, regardless of primary tumor location.

Early hypertension and neutropenia are predictors of treatment efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients administered FOLFIRI and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Three vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, Bevacizumab (BEV), ramucirumab (RAM), and aflibercept (AFL), are widely used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who are treated with second-line chemotherapy. The difference in outcome between the three drugs has not been evaluated. In contrast to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, VEGF inhibitors have few candidate predictors of efficacy. METHODS: Consecutive mCRC patients who were treated with second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were assessed. Subgroup analyses of prognostic and predictive efficacy markers were performed. RESULTS: A total of 119 (41.2%), 107 (37.0%), and 63 patients (21.8%) were treated with FOLFIRI +BEV, RAM, or AFL, respectively. ORR, PFS, and OS showed no significant differences between three groups. However, the frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) in the FOLFIRI +AFL group was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p < 0.001). Patients with grade 3 or 4 AEs, especially hypertension and neutropenia within the first four cycles of treatment had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without AEs, irrespective of treatment with VEGF inhibitors (p < 0.001). PFS in patients without prior BEV exposure was also significantly longer than that in patients with prior BEV exposure (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapeutic efficacy did not differ between the groups. Grade 3 or 4 AEs within the first four cycles of treatment and prior BEV exposure may be an effective predictor of treatment efficacy in mCRC patients administered VEGF inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy.

Managing a gastrointestinal oncology practice in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: single institutional experience in The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared to be a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. On April 7, 2020, a state of emergency was declared in Japan, as had been by other nations worldwide. This unprecedented crisis has profound implications for patients undergoing chemotherapy and for practicing healthcare professionals. Various reports have shown data indicating that cancer patients with COVID-19 have high morbidity and mortality rates. In order to reduce the use of medical resources to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infections in both cancer patients and health care providers, oncologists now have to draw the line for cancer treatments by maintaining their efficacy while avoiding severe adverse events. In this article, we outlined the decisions made regarding the practice of gastrointestinal oncology in our institution during the COVID pandemic.

Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting.

BACKGROUND: Different approaches are used to treat resectable tumours in patients having adenocarcinoma at the oesophagogastrointestinal junction (EGJ) or in the stomach. However, there is limited information about treatment efficacy for patients at metastatic stage. A recent molecular analysis of upper gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma revealed that the anatomical location can influence the molecular backgrounds of tumours. This study sought to elucidate whether different therapeutic approaches should be used for EGJ tumours relative to those in the stomach. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institute in Japan. Patients having metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma in the EGJ or stomach who underwent platinum doublet chemotherapy between January 2007 and August 2014 were enrolled. Patients in the EGJ tumour group had tumours having an epicentre within 2 cm proximal or 5 cm distal to the estimated anatomical EGJ and cardia. RESULTS: Among 378 consecutively enrolled patients, 61 were grouped into the EGJ group and the remainder comprised the stomach group. The EGJ group had more men and lower incidence of diffuse type and Borrmann type IV tumours and peritoneum metastasis compared with the stomach group. The median overall survival of patients in the EGJ and stomach groups was similar (17.3 months (95% CI 13.5 to 23.2) vs 14.5 months (95% CI 13.3 to 16.4)). No statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival. Although the overall postprogression survival differed significantly between the EGJ and stomach groups (8.2 months (95% CI 5.7 to 12.7) vs 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1 to 7.8)), on grouping patients by histological type, the two groups exhibited similar postprogression survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diffuse-type histology, higher serum CA19-9 levels and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinicopathological features of EGJ adenocarcinoma were not associated with clinical outcomes of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Histological subtype rather than anatomical location has more significance for treatment decisions for advanced gastric cancers.

Evaluation of THUNDERBEAT® in open liver resection- a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: THUNDERBEAT® (TB) (Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan) is a dynamic energy system device that simultaneously delivers ultrasonically generated frictional heat energy and electrically generated bipolar energy. TB is being routinely used in various operative procedures, however, less is known about its utility in liver resection. We, herein, report our early experience of using TB in open liver resection particularly in patients with normal or near-normal liver parenchyma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics, and evaluated the perioperative outcome of twenty-eight patients who underwent liver resection with TB, and twenty-four patients who underwent liver resection with basic procedure in our institution. The resection type was stratified into: major hepatectomy; resection of 3 or more than 3 Couinauds segments, and minor hepatectomy; resection of less than 3 Couinauds segments. RESULTS: Liver resection time (mean ± SD) in TB group with major hepatectomy was significantly shorter: 16.7 ± 8.8 compared to 62.8 ± 39.4 min in basic procedure group (P < 0.0001). Accordingly, the liver resection time (mean ± SD) in TB group with minor hepatectomy was also significantly shorter, 8.3 ± 2.9 min compared to 45.2 ± 23.9 min in liver resection with basic procedure (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of intraoperative blood transfusion ratio, postoperative complication and postoperative liver dysfunction. CONCLUSION: TB as a new energy device can offer a safe, reliable and substantially rapid liver resection particularly in patients with normal or near-normal liver parenchyma.