Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: quality of life in recipients with and without ICD shock delivery: a prospective study.

AIMS: The experiences of patients who received shocks from their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and how these events affect their overall adjustment are poorly understood. Our goal was to evaluate quality of life and psychological well-being, and the prevalence of, and changes in, depression and anxiety of patients who did or did not experience defibrillatory shocks in the first 12 months after ICD implantation. In total 167 patients were monitored after discharge. Four self-administered questionnaires were used. The first assessment took place before ICD implantation, the remaining three at 1, 6 and 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: We classified patients into three shock groups and one no shock group. A small group of ICD recipients (26%) received ICD shock delivery, usually during the last 6 months of the study. Borderline significant differences were found within the groups over time regarding physical role limitations (P < 0.051). Those who experienced shocks throughout the year (group 1) felt more limited in their daily activities due to physical or mental problems. All groups health (P < 0.001). Overall quality of life did not change significantly after 6 months. Anxiety and depression did not change significantly over time. In total 22-66% of patients reported clinically significant depressive symptoms throughout the first year, and 31-83% clinically significant symptoms of anxiety. ICD recipients who had experienced a shock were significantly more anxious one-year postdischarge than those who had not received a shock. CONCLUSIONS: Overall quality of life and psychological well-being did not change in ICD recipients, irrespective of whether they experienced defibrillatory shocks. The high prevalence of depression and anxiety can be interpreted as a response to the perceived physical and mental problems regarding daily activities. Our data indicate that patients who have experienced an ICD shock do not adapt well to living with an ICD, they are more anxious than ICD recipients who received no shocks. However, the anticipation of having another shock after experiencing one is less stressful than that of the first shock. We conclude that the lasting psychological distress will not dissipate spontaneously or naturally and that psychosocial interventions may be warranted.

A 12-month quality of life assessment of cardiac arrest survivors treated with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has a large impact on the quality of life of patients. The effects of having an ICD over longer periods of times has been less studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life and well-being of cardiac arrest survivors who have received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or other treatment. METHODS: 168 patients were monitored for 1 year and completed four questionnaires. RESULTS: No differences were found between the two treatments regarding quality of life (except for pain, ICD patients perceived less pain) and well-being. A significant improvement in physical and social function, and in mental health was found in the first 6 months. Older patients (60 years or older) perceived less improvement in their health than younger patients. Women reported having poorer social function. The prevalence of anxiety and probable depression was high irrespective of the treatment received: anxiety and depressive symptoms did not change significantly between 1 and 12 months after discharge. Patients with higher anxiety scores experienced less improvement in health and patients with more depressive symptoms experienced poorer social function. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anxiety and probable depression was high in cardiac arrest survivors. Probable depression affected social function. Those patients who felt anxious experienced less health improvement. Quality of life and well-being were not affected by the type of treatment. We conclude that surviving an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has a greater impact on patients than the treatment received.

Pain clinic EPR: requirements determination & configuration.

UNLABELLED: The focus of this study was to determine requirements for a general pain EPR (electronic patient record), design this EPR and develop a prototype for demo purposes in pain clinics in The Netherlands. The specifications for this EPR were derived from the 'Nijmegen Classification of Pain', analysis of patient paper records and in-depth interviews with six anaesthesiologists, three physiotherapists and two psychologists. For development a generic configuration tool was used. The actual EPR consisted of five components (two for the anaesthesiologists, one for the physiotherapist, one for the psychologist and one for the whole team). The five components comprised of numerous dialogues. The medical care process directed these dialogues. CONCLUSIONS: The different organisational settings and the variability in provided patient care compromised the development of an EPR for all pain clinics. Defining the granularity of the dialogues was influenced mainly by the factors mentioned previously. However, most respondents agreed on the importance of the following functional demands: registration speed, security, flexibility and supporting of communication between the care providers.