Immunotherapies for Neurological Manifestations in the Context of Systemic Autoimmunity.

Neurological involvement is relatively common in the majority of systemic autoimmune diseases and may lead to severe morbidity and mortality, if not promptly treated. Treatment options vary greatly, depending on the underlying systemic pathophysiology and the associated neurological symptoms. Selecting the appropriate therapeutic scheme is further complicated by the lack of definite therapeutic guidelines, the necessity to differentiate primary neurological syndromes from those related to the underlying systemic disease, and to sort out adverse neurological manifestations caused by immunosuppressants or the biological agents used to treat the primary disease. Immunotherapy is a sine qua non for treating most, if not all, neurological conditions presenting in the context of systemic autoimmunity. Specific agents include classical immune modulators such as corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange, as well as numerous biological therapies, for example anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and monoclonal antibodies that target various immune pathways such as B cells, cytokines, and co-stimulatory molecules. However, experience regarding the use of these agents in neurological complications of systemic diseases is mainly empirical or based on small uncontrolled studies and case series. The aim of this review is to present the state-of-the-art therapies applied in various neurological manifestations encountered in the context of systemic autoimmune diseases; evaluate all treatment options on the basis of existing guidelines; and compliment these data with our personal experience derived from a large number of patients.

Anti-aquaporin-4 autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus persist for years and induce astrocytic cytotoxicity but not CNS disease.

Anti-aquaporin-4 autoantibodies are specific for the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and they have also been described in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with neurological signs consistent with NMOSD. Our objective was to test for the presence and pathogenicity of anti-AQP4 antibodies in SLE patients without neurological disease. Sera from 89 non-CNS-SLE patients were screened for anti-AQP4 autoantibodies. Two of the 89 patients were positive. Archived samples dating back 11 years were also positive. A brain and spinal cord MRI did not reveal any NMOSD-compatible lesions. An in vitro cytotoxicity assay showed that either sera or purified IgG from these patients induced a complement-mediated damage in cultured astrocytes comparable to antibodies obtained from typical NMO patients. We conclude that AQP4-antibodies can be present in SLE patients and persist for many years, without concurrent clinical or radiological NMOSD signs. It is unclear why the anti-AQP4 antibodies did not induce CNS disease.

Immunization of mice with a peptide derived from the HTLV-1 TAX1BP1 protein induces cross-reactive antibodies against aquaporin 4.

Antibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4) are specific and pathogenetic for Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO). In a previous study, three linear intracellular AQP4 B-cell epitopes were uncovered in NMO patients. A particular epitope showed high-sequence similarity with a segment of the human TAX1BP1 protein, which is necessary for the replication of HTLV-1 virus. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether immunization of mice with the TAX1BP1 peptide could produce specific antibodies against AQP4 epitopes or induce symptoms. Eight C57Bl/6 mice were immunized with TAX1BP1pep in Complete Freund's Adjuvant and eight with adjuvant only. Animals received three subcutaneous injections and sera were obtained before each immunization and at sacrifice. All sera were evaluated by ELISA for antibodies against the TAX1BP1peptide, the homologous AQP4 peptide and all linear AQP4 epitopes. Homologous and cross-inhibition assays were performed to ensure binding specificity, and reactivity against conformational AQP4 epitopes was evaluated by a cell-based assay. Sera from immunized animals showed high reactivity against the immunization peptide, and the homologous AQP4 epitope. Inhibition assays confirmed binding specificity. No antibodies were produced against any other epitopes, either linear or conformational. No clinical or brain inflammatory signs were observed in the animals. The induction of antibodies to an AQP4 epitope in mice immunized with the TAX1BP1-derived peptide suggests that a latent HTLV-1 infection could lead to TAX1BP1 antigen presentation and the production of anti-AQP4 antibodies, probably through T cell-mediated mechanisms. Further studies are needed for exploring triggering factors for NMO especially in HTLV-1-endemic regions.

Incidence and prevalence of major central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: a 3-year prospective study of 370 patients.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and prevalence of CNS involvement in SLE remains unclear owing to conflicting results in the published studies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of major definite CNS events in SLE patients. METHODS: 370 SLE patients with no previous history of CNS involvement were prospectively evaluated in a tertiary hospital referral center for 3 years. Major CNS manifestations were codified according to ACR definitions, including chorea, aseptic meningitis, psychosis, seizures, myelopathy, demyelinating syndrome, acute confusional state and strokes. Minor CNS events were excluded. ECLAM and SLEDAI-SELENA Modification scores were used to evaluate disease activity and SLICC/ACR Damage Index was used to assess accumulated damage. RESULTS: 16/370 (4.3%) patients presented with a total of 23 major CNS events. These included seizures (35%), strokes (26%), myelopathy (22%), optic neuritis (8.7%), aseptic meningitis (4.3%) and acute psychosis (4.3%). Incidence was 7.8/100 person years. Among hospitalizations for SLE, 13% were due to CNS manifestations. Epileptic seizures were associated with high disease activity, while myelopathy correlated with lower disease activity and NMO-IgG antibodies (P≤0.05). Stroke incidence correlated with APS coexistence (P = 0.06). Overall, CNS involvement correlated with high ECLAM and SLEDAI scores (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically severe CNS involvement is rare in SLE patients, accounting for 7.8/100 person years. CNS involvement correlates with high disease activity and coexistence of specific features that define the respective CNS syndromes.