Are surrogate assumptions and use of diuretics associated with diagnosis and staging of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study measured the association between the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) diagnostic and staging criteria and surrogates for baseline serum creatinine (SCr) and body weight, compared urine output (UO) with SCr criteria, and assessed the relationships between use of diuretics and calibration between criteria and prediction of outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospective measurements of SCr, hourly UO, body weight, and drug administration records from 5701 patients admitted, after cardiac surgery, to a cardiac intensive care unit between 1995 and 2006. RESULTS: More patients (n=2424, 42.5%) met SCr diagnostic criteria with calculated SCr assuming a baseline estimated GFR of 75 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) than with known baseline SCr (n=1043, 18.3%). Fewer patients (n=484, 8.5%) met UO diagnostic criteria with assumed body weight (70 kg) than with known weight (n=624, 10.9%). Agreement between SCr and UO criteria was fair (κ=0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.31). UO diagnostic criteria were specific (0.95; 0.94-0.95) but insensitive (0.36; 0.33-0.39) compared with SCr. Intravenous diuretics were associated with higher probability of falling below the UO diagnostic threshold compared with SCr, higher 30-day mortality (relative risk, 2.27; 1.08-4.76), and the need for renal support (4.35; 1.82-10.4) compared with no diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Common surrogates for baseline estimated GFR and body weight were associated with misclassification of AKIN stage. UO criteria were insensitive compared with SCr. Intravenous diuretic use further reduced agreement and confounded association between AKIN stage and 30-day mortality or need for renal support.

Association of a factor H mutation with hemolytic uremic syndrome following a diarrheal illness.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) takes 2 forms: diarrheal HUS and nondiarrheal HUS. As its name suggests, diarrheal HUS classically follows an enteric infection. The classic infective organism is the Escherichia coli O157 serotype, although other bacteria, including Shigella species, can produce the verocytotoxin required to cause HUS. The usual clinical course is an episode of bloody diarrhea followed by thrombotic microangiopathy and acute renal failure. Supportive treatment sees recovery of renal function in the vast majority of patients. Most cases occur in children, but all age groups can be affected. Conversely, nondiarrheal HUS may have one of a number of predisposing factors, including drugs, irradiation, and hypertension. It also is well established that mutations in the genes encoding the complement regulator proteins factor H, factor I, and membrane cofactor protein predispose to nondiarrheal HUS. In patients with nondiarrheal HUS, recovery of renal function is much less common. Here, we present a case of HUS after a diarrheal illness in which the patient did not recover renal function in the long term. A novel mutation in exon 23 of the factor H gene was discovered. This is clinically important. If this patient underwent transplantation, he would be expected to have an 80% risk of graft loss at 2 years because of recurrent HUS. We recommend consideration of complement gene mutations in any patient with HUS after a diarrheal episode in which there are unusual features.

Urea space and total body water measurements by stable isotopes in patients with acute renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of urea volume of distribution (Vurea) in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) is critical in order to prescribe and monitor appropriate dialytic treatment. We have recently shown that in ARF patients, Vurea estimation by urea kinetic modeling is significantly higher than total body water (TBW) by anthropometric estimation. However, these estimates of Vurea and TBW have not been validated by isotopic methods, considered as reference measurement standards. METHODS: In this study, we measured Vurea by [13C]urea and TBW by deuterium oxide (D2O) in 21 patients with ARF (14 males, 7 females, age 62.0 +/- 10.6 years old, 83% Caucasian, 17% African American) at three different centers. These measurements were compared to TBW estimates from anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) measurements. RESULTS: Our results show that Vurea by [13C]urea (51.0 +/- 11.7 L) is significantly higher than TBW estimated by all other methods (TBW by D2O: 38.3 +/- 9.8 L, P < 0.001; TBW by BIA: 45.7 +/- 15.7 L, P= 0.08; TBW by Watson formula: 38.3 +/- 7.3 L, P < 0.001; TBW by Chertow formula: 39.3 +/- 7.8 L, P= 0.002, all versus Vurea). Despite significant overestimation of the absolute value and considerable variation, Vurea significantly correlated with TBW by BIA (r= 0.66, P < 0.01) and TBW by D2O (r= 0.5, P= 0.04). There was also significant correlation between D2O and BIA determined TBW (r= 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In terms of useful guidelines to prescribe a specific dose of dialysis in patients with ARF, conventional estimates of TBW as surrogates for Vurea should be used with caution. We propose that these conventional estimates of TBW should be increased by approximately 20% (a factor of 1.2) to avoid significant underdialysis.