Definitive diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas: MR imaging versus Tc-99m-labeled red blood cell SPECT.

Thirty-seven patients with 69 suspected hemangiomas found by means of computed tomography (CT) and/or ultrasound were studied with both 0.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and single photon emission CT (SPECT) with technetium-99m-labeled red blood cells. Using a criterion of "perfusion-blood pool mismatch," SPECT readers diagnosed 50 of 64 hemangiomas and all five "nonhemangiomas" (sensitivity, 78% [95% confidence interval, 0.664 - 0.864]; accuracy, 80% [0.69 - 0.877]). Qualitative analysis of lesion signal intensity on T2-weighted spin-echo MR images allowed readers to diagnose 58 of 64 hemangiomas and four of five nonhemangiomas (sensitivity, 91% [0.814 - 0.96]; accuracy, 90% [0.807 - 0.951]). Because of the significantly higher cost of MR imaging and its inability to categorically differentiate hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases, the authors consider SPECT to be the method of choice for diagnosing hepatic hemangiomas. MR imaging should be reserved for the diagnosis of lesions smaller than 2.0 cm and for those 2.5 cm and smaller adjacent to the heart or major hepatic vessels; in such cases MR imaging was found superior to SPECT.

Contribution of SPECT to imaging of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma with 111In-labeled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody.

Fourteen patients with suspected adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract received 1 mg of 111In-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody type ZCE025 combined with 40 mg unlabeled antibody of the same type. Planar and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) imaging studies were performed 3 days after infusion and, when possible, 7 days after infusion. Scan findings were correlated with the findings at surgery when possible. Tumor was detected by day-3 planar imaging in eight of 13 patients in whom tumor was documented histopathologically. Day-3 SPECT allowed demonstration of tumor in 11 of these 13 patients. In another patient whose scan was negative, no residual tumor was found at surgery. SPECT was particularly helpful in identifying small and midline tumors. In two cases, localization on SPECT helped identify the tumor mass on CT. Two primary tumors weighing less than 5 g could not be detected on either planar or SPECT scans. Histologically positive, normal-sized lymph nodes were not seen by planar imaging or SPECT. SPECT increased the detection rate over that achieved with planar imaging, helped to better localize scan abnormalities, and afforded more useful comparison between the monoclonal antibody study and CT.