Mortality after catheter ablation of structural heart disease related ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data describing mortality after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). OBJECTIVES: We describe the causes and predictors of cardiac transplant and/or mortality following catheter ablation of structural heart disease (SHD) related VT. METHODS: Over 10-years, 175 SHD patients underwent VT ablation. Clinical characteristics, and outcomes, were compared between patients undergoing transplant and/or dying and those surviving. RESULTS: During 2.8 (IQR 1.9-5.0) years follow-up, 37/175 (21%) patients underwent transplant and/or died following VT ablation. Prior to ablation, these patients were older (70.3 ± 11.1 vs. 62.1 ± 13.9 years, P = 0.001), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction ([LVEF] 30 ± 12% vs. 44 ± 14%, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have failed amiodarone (57% vs. 39%, P = 0.050), compared to those that survived. Predictors of transplant and/or mortality included LVEF≤35% (HR 4.71 [95% CI 2.18-10.18], P < 0.001), age ≥ 65 years (HR 2.18 [95% CI 1.01-4.73], P = 0.047), renal impairment (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.80-7.74], P < 0.001), amiodarone failure (HR 2.67 [95% CI 1.27-5.63], P = 0.010) and malignancy (HR 3.09 [95% CI 1.03-9.26], P = 0.043). Ventricular arrhythmia free survival at 6-months was lower in the transplant and/or deceased, compared to non-deceased group (62% vs. 78%, P = 0.010), but was not independently associated with transplant and/or mortality. The risk score, MORTALITIES-VA, accurately predicted transplant and/or mortality (AUC: 0.872 [95% CI 0.810-0.934]). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac transplant and/or mortality after VT ablation occurred in 21% of patients. Independent predictors included LVEF≤35%, age ≥ 65 years, renal impairment, malignancy, and amiodarone failure. The MORTALITIES-VA score may identify patients at high-risk of transplant and/or dying after VT ablation.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as first-line therapy for the management of ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) in line with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in VT management; however, it is unknown if CA should be considered as first-line therapy. The aim of this study is to verify the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy for the first VT presentation (as adjunctive to ICD insertion), compared to initial ICD insertion and anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. METHODS: Data from patients with the first presentation for VT from January 2017 to January 2021 was reviewed. Patients were classified as "ablation first" vs "ICD first" groups and compared the clinical outcomes between groups. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients presented with VT; 34 underwent CA as first-line therapy prior to ICD insertion, and 150 had ICD insertion/AAD therapy as first-line. During the median follow-up of 625 days, patients who underwent CA as first-line therapy had significantly higher ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (91% vs 59%, log-rank P = 0.002) and composite of VA recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, transplant, and death (84% vs 54%, log-rank P = 0.01) compared to those who did not undergo CA. Multivariate analysis revealed that first-line CA was the only protective predictor of VA recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0.20, P = 0.003). There were 3 (9%) peri-procedural complications with no peri-procedural deaths. CONCLUSION: Real-world data supports the efficacy and safety of CA as first-line therapy at the time of the first VT hospitalization, compared to the initial ICD implant and AAD therapy.

A Prospective, Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Structural Heart Disease Related Ventricular Tachycardia: The CAAD-VT Trial Protocol.

IMPORTANCE: Randomised trials have shown that catheter ablation (CA) is superior to medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) largely in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Whether this translates to patients with all forms and stages of structural heart disease (SHD-e.g., non-ischaemic heart disease) is unclear. This trial will help clarify whether catheter ablation offers superior outcomes compared to medical therapy for VT in all patients with SHD. OBJECTIVE: To determine in patients with SHD and spontaneous or inducible VT, if catheter ablation is more efficacious than medical therapy in control of VT during follow-up. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial including 162 patients, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and geographical region of site, with a median follow-up of 18-months and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. SETTING: Multicentre study performed in centres across Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Structural heart disease patients with sustained VT or inducible VT (n=162). INTERVENTION: Early treatment, within 30 days of randomisation, with catheter ablation (intervention) or initial treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs only (control). MAIN OUTCOMES, MEASURES, AND RESULTS: Primary endpoint will be a composite of recurrent VT, VT storm (≥3 VT episodes in 24 hrs or incessant VT), or death. Secondary outcomes will include each of the individual primary endpoints, VT burden (number of VT episodes in the 6 months preceding intervention compared to the 6 months after intervention), cardiovascular hospitalisation, mortality (including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and non-cardiac death) and LVEF (assessed by transthoracic echocardiography from baseline to 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-months post intervention). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Catheter Ablation versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Ventricular Tachycardia (CAAD-VT) trial will help determine whether catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone, in patients with SHD-related VT. TRIAL REGISTRY: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: ACTRN12620000045910 TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377617&isReview=true.

Correlation of spatial patterns of endocardial pace mapping to underlying scar topography in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Endocardial pace mapping (PM) can identify conducting channels for ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Recent findings show the temporal and spatial pattern of PM may aid identification of the surface harboring VT isthmii. The specific correlation of PM patterns to scar topography has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the pattern of endocardial PMs to underlying scar topography in SHD patients with VT. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing VT ablation from August 2018 to February 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with SHD-related VT (mean age 65 ± 14 years) with 83 endocardial PM correlation maps were analysed. Two main correlation patterns were identified, an "abrupt-change correlation pattern (AC-pattern)" and "centrifugal-attenuation correlation pattern (CA-pattern)." AC-pattern had lower scar ratio (unipolar/bipolar % scar area; 1.1 vs. 1.5, p < .001), had longer maximal stimulus-QRS intervals (97.5 vs. 68 ms, p = .002), and higher likelihood of endocardial dominant scar (11/21 [52%] vs. 3/38 [8%], p < .001) than CA-pattern seen on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). In contrast, CA-pattern was more likely to have epicardial dominant scar or mid-intramural scar on ICE (epicardial dominant scar; CA-pattern: 12/38 [32%] vs. AC-pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .02, mid-intramural scar; CA-pattern: 15/38 [39%] vs. AC-pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The spatial pattern of endocardial PM in SHD-related VT directly correlates with scar topography. AC-pattern is associated with endocardial dominant scar on ICE with lower scar ratio and longer stimulus-QRS intervals, whereas CA-pattern is strongly associated with epicardial dominant or mid-intramural scar with higher scar ratio and shorter stimulus-QRS intervals.

Impact of sex on clinical, procedural characteristics and outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias according to underlying heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Women are under-represented in many key studies and trials examining outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular arrhythmias (VA). We compared characteristics between men and women undergoing their first catheter ablation for VA at a single centre over 10 years. METHODS: The clinical, procedural characteristics and outcomes of 287 consecutive patients (male = 182, female = 105), undergoing their first CA at our centre over 10 years were compared according to sex and underlying heart disease. RESULTS: In the ablation population, women were younger, had fewer co-morbidities, were less likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and VA storm and were more likely to have idiopathic VA and premature ventricular complexes as the indication for ablation (P < 0.05 for all). Amongst idiopathic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) subgroups, baseline characteristics were similar; amongst ICM, women were younger and had higher numbers of drug failure pre-ablation (P = 0.05). Women were similar to men in all procedural characteristics, acute procedural success and complications, regardless of underlying heart disease. At median follow-up of 666 days, VA-free survival, overall mortality and survival free of death or transplant were comparable in both groups. Sex was not a predictor of these outcomes, after accounting for clinical and procedural characteristics. CONCLUSION: Women represented 36% of the real-world population at our centre referred for CA of VA. There are key differences in clinical features of women versus men referred for VA ablation. Despite these differences, VA ablation in women can be accomplished with similar success and complication rates to men, regardless of underlying heart disease.

Intracardiac echocardiography techniques to identify ventricular arrhythmia substrate.

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used to facilitate catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA). It allows intraprocedural recognition of myocardial substrate, optimization of catheter-tissue contact, identification of anatomical barriers to ablation, and early recognition of complications. In the era where the 3-dimensionality of substrate for VA is increasingly recognized, ICE is invaluable in identifying scar topography in the endocardial, midmyocardial, and epicardial layers. ICE assists in identifying endocavitary structures that are a common source of VA in idiopathic and structural heart disease. Furthermore, as substrate imaging of the right ventricle has not been optimized with other imaging modalities, ICE offers a unique opportunity to visualize substrate in this chamber. Real-time substrate identification can be particularly useful where there are contraindications to use of other imaging modalities or the images are obscured by artefact in the presence of cardiac device leads. In this review we provide a step-by-step guide in the techniques used to image ventricular arrhythmia substrate with ICE. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of this technique in comparison to other imaging modalities.

The Role of Contemporary Wearable and Handheld Devices in the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Cardiac arrhythmias are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and economic burden on the health care system. Detection and surveillance of cardiac arrhythmias using medical grade non-invasive methods (electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring) is the accepted standard of care. Whilst their accuracy is excellent, significant limitations remain in terms of accessibility, ease of use, cost, and a suboptimal diagnostic yield (up to ∼50%) which is critically dependent on the duration of monitoring. Contemporary wearable and handheld devices that utilise photoplethysmography and the electrocardiogram present a novel opportunity for remote screening and diagnosis of arrhythmias. They have significant advantages in terms of accessibility and availability with the potential of enhancing the diagnostic yield of episodic arrhythmias. However, there is limited data on the accuracy and diagnostic utility of these devices and their role in therapeutic decision making in clinical practice remains unclear. Evidence is mounting that they may be useful in screening for atrial fibrillation, and anecdotally, for the diagnosis of other brady and tachyarrhythmias. Recently, there has been an explosion of patient uptake of such devices for self-monitoring of arrhythmias. Frequently, the clinician is presented such information for review and comment, which may influence clinical decisions about treatment. Further studies are needed before incorporation of such technologies in routine clinical practice, given the lack of systematic data on their accuracy and utility. Moreover, challenges with regulation of quality standards and privacy remain. This state-of-the-art review summarises the role of novel ambulatory, commercially available, heart rhythm monitors in the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmias and their expanding role in the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm in cardiology.

Will the insulated-tip radiofrequency catheter transform ablation procedures?

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been the most widely employed energy source for catheter ablation to date. However, most of conventional RF ablation energy dissipates into the bloodstream before reaching the target tissue. Technology that conveys RF energy exclusively toward target tissue may potentially improve the quality, safety, and outcome of the RF ablation procedures. RF ablation using a novel insulated-tip catheter (Sirona Medical Technologies [SMT]) may refine RF ablation in the future to minimize the risk of iatrogenic complications. Although it is still unclear whether the results of the SMT catheter can be translated to a human beating heart, the data for SMT catheter of this study are very promising.

A case report of inappropriate inhibition of ventricular pacing due to a unique pacemaker electrogram storage feature.

BACKGROUND: Modern permanent pacemakers (PPMs) have individual features designed to identify cardiac rhythm abnormalities and improve their performance. Inappropriate pacing inhibition may be an undesired outcome from these features and cause symptoms in patients who require frequent pacing, leading to dizziness, and syncope. Inappropriate inhibition can be difficult to identify in circumstances that are intermittent and difficult to reproduce. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old female underwent a mitral valve replacement (MVR) for severe mitral stenosis. One month following MVR, she presented with symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular block, and a dual-chamber PPM (Advisa™, Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) was implanted and programmed DDD 50-130 b.p.m. At the 3-month follow-up, she reported frequent episodes of lightheadedness. She was found to have intermittent ventricular pacing inhibition on a 48-h Holter monitor due to an internal function of the Advisa™ series of PPMs that attempts to store an electrogram (EGM) every 1 h and 30 s. During the EGM storage, an amplified signal from the storage capacitor can result in oversensing by the ventricular channel and inappropriate pacing inhibition. DISCUSSION: To rectify the issue, the ventricular lead sensitivity value was increased from 0.9 mV to 1.2 mV. No instances of inappropriate ventricular pacing inhibition were noted on follow-up. To our knowledge, this is a rare case of inappropriate ventricular pacing inhibition caused by a combination of PPM self-adjusting sensitivity algorithm and oversensing every 1 h and 30 s from an amplified storage capacitor. Physicians should be aware of this possible complication and differentiate it from device or lead malfunction.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalisation in Patients With Intracardiac Device-Related Tricuspid Regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a known complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). A better understanding of the patient population affected by this complication and their outcomes is needed. The aims of our study were to: 1) describe the incidence of CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation; 2) identify patient characteristics conferring risk; 3) assess the long-term risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and mortality in patients with this complication. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2,265 patients that had a de novo device implantation at a tertiary referral centre between January 2010 and December 2017. Patients with echocardiograms prior to and at least 3 months after device implantation were included. Patients with moderate or severe TR at baseline were excluded. RESULTS: Following screening of medical records, 165 patients were analysed. Forty-four (44) (27%) patients developed new-onset moderate or severe device-related TR, without a significant difference between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Patients with CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation had a higher rate of hospitalisation for heart failure than those without (63.6% vs 34.7%, p=0.001) during a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 13-60 months). Subsequent analyses showed that the association between CIED-related TR and heart failure hospitalisation only became significant in the period beyond 12 months following CIED implantation. Piecewise Cox regression analysis stratified at 12 months of follow-up showed that CIED-related TR was associated with an increased risk of heart failure hospitalisation beyond 12 months after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.05-3.76, p=0.03). There was a higher mortality rate in the group with CIED-related TR; however, this did not reach significance (36.3% vs 22.3%, p=0.09). CONCLUSION: CIED-related TR is common and clinically significant with serious implications for long-term outcomes, especially congestive heart failure.

A simple maneuver to determine if septal accessory pathway ablation requires a left atrial approach.

INTRODUCTION: Septal accessory pathway (AP) ablation can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the septal region. The decision to access the left atrium (LA) is often made after failure of ablation from the right. We sought to establish whether the difference between ventriculo-atrial (VA) time during right ventricular (RV) apical pacing versus the VA during tachycardia would help establish the successful site for ablation of septal APs. METHODS: Intracardiac electrograms of patients with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) using a septal AP with successful catheter ablation were reviewed. The ∆VA was the difference between the VA interval during RV apical pacing and the VA interval during ORT. The difference in the VA interval during right ventricular entrainment and ORT (StimA-VA) was also measured. RESULTS: The median ∆VA time was significantly less in patients with a septal AP ablated on the right side compared with patients with a septal AP ablated on the left side (12 ± 19 vs. 56 ± 10 ms, p < .001). The StimA-VA was significantly different between the two groups (22 ± 14 vs. 53 ± 9 ms, p < .001). The ∆VA and StimA-VA were always ≤ 40 ms in patients with non-decremental septal APs ablated from the right side and always greater than 40 ms in those with septal APs ablated from the left. CONCLUSION: ΔVA and StimA-VA values identified with RV apical pacing in the setting of ORT involving a septal AP predict when left atrial access will be necessary for successful ablation.

A Comparison of Image Quality Using Radial vs Femoral Approaches in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

INTRODUCTION: Radial access for diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) has gained traction in recent years over the femoral artery approach, but difference in image quality has not been extensively studied. This study aims to compare image quality and diagnostic value in radial vs femoral access in patients undergoing invasive CAG. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 200 patients (100 radial and 100 femoral) undergoing CAG at an experienced center from 2014 to 2015. The primary endpoint was angiographic image quality, and secondary endpoints were proportion of non-diagnostic images and patient radiation dose. Image quality was assessed by four experienced angiographers using a quantitative scale. Mean differences in scores were compared as well as proportion of non-diagnostic images produced. RESULTS: Radial access produced images that were significantly poorer than femoral access when viewing the left coronary artery (2.65 ± 0.04 vs 2.79 ± 0.03; P<.01). This difference remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, and catheter size (P=.04). There was no significant difference in image quality between the radial and femoral group when viewing the right coronary artery (2.91 ± 0.03 vs 2.84 ± 0.04; P=.11). There was a higher proportion of non-diagnostic images produced by radial access than femoral (3.23% vs 2.02%; P<.01) and radial access resulted in higher patient radiation doses (832.81 ± 49.59 mGy vs 645.69 ± 35.46 mGy; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Radial access produces poorer angiographic image quality and exposes patients to greater radiation compared to femoral access in contemporary practice. An awareness of these limitations is important when selecting mode of access in patients undergoing diagnostic CAG.

Contemporary Review of Left Bundle Branch Block in the Failing Heart - Pathogenesis, Prognosis, and Therapy.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone in the contemporary management of heart failure. The most effective way of predicting response to this therapy remains electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria of electromechanical dyssynchrony. The left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern is currently the most robust ECG criterion in predicting improvement in symptoms and reduction in mortality. However, recent studies using three-dimensional (3D) mapping and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) have demonstrated heterogeneous left ventricular activation patterns in patients with LBBB. This has led to intense debate on the activation pattern of "true LBBB" and resulted in the proposal of stricter criteria for defining LBBB. This review will focus on the definitions and implications of LBBB in the CRT era. At a minimum, the use of stricter ECG criteria appears warranted, and adjunctive pre-implant imaging or mapping may further identify patient-specific electrophysiological patterns that determine response to CRT.