Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Asian J Surg ; 2024 Apr 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation and failure can help determine which AVF will undergo successful canulation and which ones will require immediate rescue. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Vajira Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, between October 2020-November 2022. A single vascular surgeon performed a physical examination on patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing AVF placement, and a radiologist conducted Doppler ultrasonography during the second and sixth postoperative weeks. Dialysis nurses determined AVF maturity by performing cannulation. The study compared the accuracy of physical examination and Doppler ultrasonography. A model was developed to predict the success of AVF use. RESULTS: Out Of the 125 recruited patients, 81% demonstrate unassisted maturation of their AVF. The male sex and brachiocephalic type are associated with AVF maturation. The physical examination findings of palpable thrill and the absence of a strong pulse at the 6th week show an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) value of 0.79. Similarly, arterial end-diastolic velocity on ultrasonography at the 6th week also demonstrates a comparable predictive value with an AUC of 0.82 (p = 0.697). Meanwhile, the model that combined end-diastolic velocity and venous volume flow yields the best results for predicting AVF maturation, with an AUC of 0.92. These models provide more accurate predictions compared to physical examination alone (AUC: 0.92 vs. 0.79; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although a prudent physician predicts AVF maturation through a thorough physical examination, Doppler ultrasonography is preferred in anticipating the success of postoperative AVF placement.

2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 158-164, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study assesses the influence of tunneled hemodialysis catheter tip location and lateralization on catheter-related complications, including dysfunction and catheter-related bloodstream infection. METHODS: Using data from 162 patients who underwent catheter placement between January 2017 and December 2020, postoperative chest X-rays and clinical records were reviewed. Outcomes were assessed based on catheter removal duration and complication incidence. RESULTS: Out of 177 catheter placements, 56 (32%) patients experienced complications during an average 530-day follow-up. Catheters placed in the superior vena cava (SVC) exhibited more severe complications with shorter dwell times compared with those in the pericavoatrial junction (pCAJ) or right atrium (RA). Moreover, complication rates were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the SVC (1.91 per 1000 catheter days) compared with the pCAJ (0.54) or RA (0.47). Lateralization (right or left internal jugular vein) did not significantly affect the complication rates (0.60 vs. 0.58; P = 0.90). However, in subgroup analysis, a significantly higher complication rate was observed for catheters with tips inserted from the left side into the SVC than for those inserted from the right side (6.6 vs. 1.5; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Catheters with tips in the SVC exhibited more severe complications than those in the pCAJ or RA, with left-side insertion of SVC-tipped catheters resulting in significantly higher complication rates compared with right-side insertion. These findings highlight the importance of optimal catheter tip positioning in long-term hemodialysis care to minimize complications and enhance patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres de Demora , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Remoção de Dispositivo , Diálise Renal , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Fatores de Tempo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Veia Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Desenho de Equipamento
3.
J Vasc Access ; 24(6): 1244-1252, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35389293

RESUMO

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and technical success rates achieved after performing balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) for non-matured arteriovenous fistula (AVF). For this, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed and Scopus databases. Studies regarding AVFs not suitable for use based on clinical examination or ultrasound criteria and BAM use for correcting the underlying stenotic lesion were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Accordingly, 13 studies with 1427 patients with non-matured AVF who underwent BAM were included. The pooled random effect for the clinical success rate was 90% (95% CI, 86%-93%), and that for the technical success rate was 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%). Complications after BAM were reported in 1.7%-41% of the patients. Complications included venous ruptures, wall hematomas, and puncture site hematomas. Early-BAM group had better clinical success rates. BAM is an effective intervention for salvaging non-matured AVF. The procedure is safe and feasible, and high clinical and technical success rates can be achieved. The complications were also manageable without serious sequelae.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Humanos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Diálise Renal , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/métodos , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Hematoma/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...