[Generation of an FAQ page on Dealing with Multi-resistant Pathogens at the Interface of Veterinary and Human Medicine]. / Konzeption von Frequently Asked Questions zum Umgang mit multiresistenten Erregern an der Schnittstelle von Veterinär- und Humanmedizin.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this work were the systematic and evidence-based generation and answering of frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding contact with multi-drug resistant pathogens (MDR) including aspects of veterinary and human medicine for the public health service (PHS) and the general population. METHODS: In order to determine the information needs of the population, guideline-based expert interviews with veterinarians and physicians were conducted in five surveys. In addition, information about the project was published in two journals and the participants were asked to submit open questions from their daily routine with respect to MDR. The results of the interviews and project calls were divided into categories, and frequently mentioned topics were prepared as FAQ. For answering the FAQ, a systematic literature search in the databases Pubmed and Wiley Online Library was conducted. A panel of experts subsequently evaluated the FAQ drafts, and a consensus was reached in case of conflicting results. Thereafter, the FAQs were evaluated by physicians and veterinarians of the PHS. RESULTS: Nine FAQs were generated in total. In addition to a survey of the current state of research, recommendations were made for private dealing with non-medical contact with MDR at the interface of human and veterinary medicine. The recommendations depended on the respective setting and the type of animal contact. Different recommendations were given for the handling of MDR in pets, farm animals, animals in communal facilities and animals used for animal-assisted therapies. The most important measure against the spread of MDR between humans and animals proved to be regular and careful handwashing. CONCLUSION: Mixed methods were used to ensure the quality of the FAQ. Limitations were found in the literature search. Not all submitted questions could be answered with the available literature. In the future, the FAQ should be continuously updated and extended.

Living alone is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men but not women from the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine sex-specific associations between living alone and incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus in a representative population sample in Germany. METHODS: The study was based on 4424 men and 4380 women (aged 35-74 years) who participated in one of the three Monitoring trends and determinants on cardiovascular diseases Augsburg surveys between 1984 and 1995 and who were free of diabetes at baseline. Sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 402 cases of incident Type 2 diabetes among men and 271 among women were registered during the mean follow-up period of 10.9 years. Living alone was significantly associated with incident Type 2 diabetes in men but not in women. After adjustment for age, survey, parental history of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, and body mass index, the risk of developing diabetes for those who lived alone at baseline compared with those who did not live alone was 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-2.37) in men and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.57-1.24) in women; the p value for the sex interaction was .006 in this model. Inclusion of education and depressed mood in the models in addition to other risk factors had no impact on the observed HRs in women and even increased the risk in men (women: HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.52-1.32; men: HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.33-2.70). CONCLUSIONS: Living alone is an independent predictor of Type 2 diabetes in men but not in women from the general population.

Association of sports activities in leisure time and incident myocardial infarction in middle-aged men and women from the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To examine sex-specific associations between sports activities in leisure time and incident myocardial infarction (MI) in a representative population sample in Germany. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: The study was based on 3501 men and 3475 women (aged 45-74 years) who participated in one of the three MONICA Augsburg surveys between 1984 and 1995 and were followed up until 2002. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 295 cases of incident MIs among men and 91 among women were registered during a median follow-up period of 8.6 years. In both sexes, moderate and high level of sports activities in leisure time were associated with a reduced risk of incident MI after age and survey adjustment; the HRs of MIs associated with a moderate and high level of sports activities in leisure time were 0.68 (0.49-0.96), and 0.71 (0.50-0.99) for men and 0.42 (0.21-0.84), and 0.18 (0.04-0.74) for women. Further adjustment for other major coronary heart disease risk factors attenuated the HRs: in moderately and highly active men, the HRs were not significant anymore (HRs 0.78 and 0.84, respectively), but the HRs remained significantly reduced in moderately and highly active women (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-1.00 and HR 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.87, respectively). CONCLUSION: Moderate or high levels of sports activities in leisure time are associated with a significantly reduced risk of MI in women, but not men from the general population.

Living alone is a risk factor for mortality in men but not women from the general population: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: During the past decades a rising trend of living alone can be observed in the population especially in urban areas. Living alone is considered a psychosocial risk factor. We studied the relationship between living alone, cardiovascular risk factors and mortality. METHODS: We analysed data from the population-based MONICA/KORA cohort study including 3596 men and 3420 women of at least one of three surveys carried out between 1984 and 1995 in the region of Augsburg, Germany. They were between 45 and 74 years old and were followed-up until 31 December 2002. During follow-up 811 men and 388 women died. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine the association between living alone and mortality. RESULTS: Altogether 260 men (7%) and 620 women (18%) were living alone at baseline. Men, who lived alone, were less well educated, had fewer children and friends, and they smoked significantly more than other men. Women, living alone, were also significantly more often current smokers and had less children and friends, but they were more often better educated than cohabitating women. The latter group showed a higher proportion of obese and hypertensive women. Men living alone had a twofold risk to die after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio = 1.96; p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval 1.56-2.46). This was not the case for women. CONCLUSION: Living alone is an independent risk factor for mortality in men. It is unclear whether living alone causes an increased mortality or whether predisposition for increased mortality is responsible for men living alone.