Long-term treatment of Cushing's disease with pasireotide: 5-year results from an open-label extension study of a Phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Treating hypercortisolism in patients with Cushing's disease after failed surgery often requires chronic medication, underlining the need for therapies with favourable long-term efficacy and safety profiles. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind study, 162 adult patients with persistent/recurrent or de novo Cushing's disease received pasireotide. Patients with mean urinary free cortisol at/below the upper limit of normal or clinical benefit at month 12 could continue receiving pasireotide during an open-ended, open-label phase, the outcomes of which are described herein. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received 5 years of pasireotide treatment. Among these, median (95% confidence interval) percentage change from baseline in mean urinary free cortisol was -82.6% (-89.0, -41.9) and -81.8% (-89.8, -67.4) at months 12 and 60. Eleven patients had mean urinary free cortisol ≤ upper limit of normal at month 60. Improvements in clinical signs were sustained during long-term treatment. The safety profile of pasireotide at 5 years was similar to that reported after 12 months. Fifteen of 16 patients experienced a hyperglycaemia-related adverse event; glycated haemoglobin levels were stable between months 6 and 60. Adverse events related to hyperglycaemia, bradycardia, gallbladder/biliary tract, and liver safety were most likely to first occur by month 6; adverse event severity did not tend to worsen over time. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the longest prospective trial of a medical therapy for Cushing's disease to date. A subset of patients treated with pasireotide maintained biochemical and clinical improvements for 5 years, with no new safety signals emerging. These data support the use of pasireotide as an effective long-term therapy for some patients with Cushing's disease.

SDZ ASM 981: an emerging safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: SDZ ASM 981 is a selective inhibitor of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from T cells and mast cells in vitro. It is the first ascomycin macrolactam derivative under development for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.6% and 1.0% in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis and to select the concentration to be used in phase III studies. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre dose-finding study. A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.6%, or 1.0%, matching vehicle cream, or the internal control 0.1% betamethasone-17-valerate cream (BMV). Treatment was given twice daily for up to 3 weeks. RESULTS: A clear dose-response relationship for SDZ ASM 981 was evident, with 0.2%, 0.6% and 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 creams all being significantly more effective than vehicle (P = 0.041, 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) in terms of baseline to end-point changes in the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) and pruritus score. The 1.0% cream was the most effective SDZ ASM 981 concentration. BMV was more effective than the SDZ ASM 981 creams tested in this study. It appears that the efficacy plateau was not reached with the SDZ ASM 981 creams within 3 weeks treatment. SDZ ASM 981 was well tolerated. Burning or a feeling of warmth were the only adverse events reported more frequently in the 0.6% and 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 treatment groups than in the vehicle treatment group (42.9%, 48.9% and 34.9%, respectively). Few systemic adverse events were reported during the study (headache was the most frequent systemic event reported by 15 of 252 patients) and none was considered to be related to treatment. The local tolerability profile of the 1.0% cream was similar to that of the lower concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 cream, which was shown to be safe, well tolerated and the most effective concentration in this study, was selected as the concentration to be further developed in phase III studies.

Prostate-specific antigen: A surrogate endpoint for screening new agents against prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND: An endpoint for clinical trials of prostate cancer which simplifies traditional endpoints (response of measurable lesions, progression rates, and death) is urgently needed. This is especially true for hormone-unresponsive disease, for which many new drugs are presently in a development phase. This paper presents a rationale for the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in clinical trials of progressive prostate cancer under endocrine treatment. METHODS: The study is based on 84 patients who progressed after radical prostatectomy or node dissection, of whom 24 showed increasing PSA levels under subsequent endocrine treatment. An average linear relationship between (log-transformed) PSA and time and a subject-specific deviation from this average relationship were assessed. The predictive value of the subject-specific parameters of the linear fit with respect to time to prostate cancer-specific death was determined. The outcomes of the fitting procedure were used to calculate sample sizes for future studies (duration, 6 months) using PSA increase over time in hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer as a marker for treatment efficacy. RESULTS: The average PSA doubling time in this population was 4 months (corresponding time constant = 0.25). The assessed variance of the time constants equalled 0.04; the overall residual variance equalled 0.265. The subject-specific rate of change of the log-transformed PSA value in hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer was a highly significant predictor of prostate cancer-specific death. This suggests the potential usefulness of PSA as an endpoint in trials of hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer. Depending on conditions chosen (e.g, desired power and changes in log PSA slope), 18-70 participants per arm will be necessary in future phase III studies. A suggestion (algorithm) for the use of PSA in drug development is presented. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small PSA-based trials in patients with hormone-unresponsive prostate cancer are possible if a similar patient population is utilized. As long as surrogacy is not established, such studies cannot be considered conclusive with respect to effectiveness of treatment, but are likely to be useful as a screening tool for new drugs. Experimental confirmation in human prostate cancer model systems of synergism between PSA decrease and tumor control by a given test treatment is likely to enhance the level of certainty of PSA-based drug evaluation.

A randomised phase II study of oral pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer.

47 patients with progressive, painful, predominantly lytic bone metastases from breast cancer were included in a randomised double-blind phase II trial comparing the effects of pamidronate 150 and 300 mg daily. Oral pamidronate produced either sclerosis or stabilisation of lytic metastases for at least 24 weeks in 5 of 24 and 3 of 23 patients at the 300 and 150 mg dose levels, respectively. Evidence of symptomatic improvement was observed in 5 of 22 (23%) and 7 of 22 (32%) patients for symptomatic disease at the respective doses. These improvements were accompanied by a reduction in the rate of bone resorption as shown by suppression (P = < 0.01) of urinary calcium and a non-significant fall in deoxypyridinoline. No obvious differences in efficacy were observed between the two dose levels. Gastrointestinal adverse events, principally comprising nausea and vomiting, were the most commonly reported side-effects leading to discontinuation of trial treatment in 4 of 24 and 2 of 23 patients at 300 and 150 mg dose levels, respectively. The poor tolerability of oral pamidronate coupled with the modest clinical effects reported here suggest that oral pamidronate will not replace the current strategy of regular intravenous infusions of pamidronate for the treatment of osteolytic bone disease.

Failure of oral pamidronate to reduce skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Danish-Swedish co-operative study group.

In order to study whether oral bisphosphonate therapy might prevent or reduce skeletal-related morbidity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who required chemotherapy, 300 patients were included in a randomized multi-centre trial. Patients were given oral pamidronate at a dose of 300 mg daily, or placebo, in addition to conventional intermittent melphalan/prednisolone (and in some cases alpha-interferon) treatment. With a median treatment duration of about 550d, no statistically significant reduction in skeletal-related morbidity (defined as bone fracture, related surgery, vertebral collapse, or increase in number and/or size of bone lesions) could be demonstrated. Pamidronate treatment also did not have any influence on patient survival or on the frequency of hypercalcaemia. However, in patients treated with pamidronate there were fewer episodes of severe pain (P=0.02) and a decreased reduction of body height of 1.5 cm (P= 0.02). The overall negative result of the study is attributed to the very low absorption of orally administered bisphosphonates in general.

An in vitro and in vivo study of cytokines in the acute-phase response associated with bisphosphonates.

We studied the acute phase response, including specific cytokine production, [interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha(TNF alpha)] following a single dose of Aredia (disodium pamidronate) in patients with increased bone turnover and, in vitro, the role played by specific cytokines in the acute-phase reaction which may follow the administration of aminobisphosphonates. An in vivo exploratory study was done on 24 in- and outpatients with increased bone turnover given a single intravenous dose of pamidronate 60 mg. Measurements were taken at baseline and at 24, 48, and 72 hours. The main outcome measures were changes from baseline in serum IL-1, IL-6, and TNF alpha. In addition, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WCC), lymphocyte count, and elastase concentration were measured. Symptomatic evaluation was made of fever, bone pain, and rigors. In vitro, whole blood from eight healthy volunteers was exposed to various concentrations of the three bisphosphonates--pamidronate, clodronate, and zoledronate. Measurements were taken immediately before and at 3, 6, and 10 hours after exposure to drugs. The main outcome measures were changes in serum IL-1, IL-6, and TNF alpha. In vivo, there was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) increase in median values of TNF alpha in all post-baseline measurements. Median values for IL-6 also showed a significant (P < 0.001) increase at 24 hours after dosing. There were no statistically significant changes in median IL-1 values. Few patients showed any change from baseline in total WCC or in lymphocyte count, but 62.5% of patients with normal range baseline values for CRP increased to above normal levels after treatment. Fourteen patients experienced fever; 2 reported rigors. There was no correlation between fever and changes in cytokines. There were no serious adverse experiences or premature discontinuations due to poor tolerability, and 91% of the patients expressed willingness to receive pamidronate again. In vitro, an increase in TNF alpha and a mild increase in IL-6 was seen with all bisphosphonates, with the greatest effects seen with the highest concentration of both pamidronate and zoledronate. No changes were observed in IL-1 with any agent. Significant changes in both TNF alpha and IL-6 were observed within 3 days of a single dose of pamidronate in patients treated for the first time confirming previous findings. However, the lack of change in IL-1 in vivo and in vitro does not support the hypothesis that this cytokine plays a major role in the acute phase reaction. The cellular mechanism of the interaction among aminobisphosphonates, IL-6, and TNF alpha requires further investigations. The results of the in vitro study are consistent with the in vivo findings.